Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit ((MBIU))

Abstract

Although no real insights into the mechanisms of development were obtained until after 1880, when experimental approaches to embryology were established, descriptive studies of embryo development have been around for millennia. Aristotle (384–322 BC) wrote a very detailed description of mammalian embryogenesis, similar to the picture we accept today, inferring that the process was driven by an entekch, known as a “vital force” in later centuries. Descriptive studies continued after 1550 but there was no further serious discussion of the mechanisms of embryo development until the 18th and 19th centuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vincent J-P, Briscoe J. Morphogens. Curr Biol 2001;11(21):R851–R854.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabata T, Takei Y. Morphogens, their identification and regulation. Development 2004;131(4):703–712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tessier-Lavigne M. Axon guidance by diffusible repellants and attractants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1994;4(4):596–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zecca M, Basler K, Struhl G. Direct and long-range action of a wingless morphogen gradient. Cell 1996;87(5):833–844.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lecuit T, Brook WJ, Ng M et al. Two distinct mechanisms for long-range patterning by Decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Nature 1996;381(6581):387–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Schier AF. The zebrafish nodal signal squint functions as a morphogen. Nature 2001;411:607–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Charron F, Stein E, Jeong J et al. The morphogen sonic hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with netrin-1 in midline axon guidance. Cell 2003;113(1):11–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tabata T, Kornberg TB. Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 1994;76(1):89–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neumann CJ, Cohen SM. A hierarchy of cross-regulation involving Notch, wingless, vestigial and cut organizes the dorsal/ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development 1996;122(11):3477–3485.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 1980;287(5785):795–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingham PW, Taylor AM, Nakano Y. Role of the Drosophila patched gene in positional signalling. Nature 1991;353(6340):184–187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taipale J, Cooper MK, Maiti T et al. Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature 2002;418(6900):892–897.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lum L, Zhang C, Oh S et al. Hedgehog signal transduction via Smoothened association with a cytoplasmic complex scaffolded by the atypical kinesin, Costal-2. Mol Cell 2003;12(5):1261–1274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu AJ, Zheng L, Suyama K et al. Altered localization of Drosophila Smoothened protein activates Hedgehog signal transduction. Genes Dev 2003;17(10):1240–1252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hooper JE. Smoothened translates Hedgehog levels into distinct responses. Development 2003;130(17):3951–3963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nybakken KE, Turck CW, Robbins DJ et al. Hedgehog-stimulated phosphorylation of the kinesin-related protein Costal2 is mediated by the serine/threonine kinase fused. J Biol Chem 2002;277(27):24638–24647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen CH, von Kessler DP, Park W et al. Nuclear trafficking of Cubitus interruptus in the transcriptional regulation of Hedgehog target gene expression. Cell 1999;98(3):305–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aza-Blanc P, Ramirez-Weber FA, Laget MP et al. Proteolysis that is inhibited by hedgehog targets Cubitus interruptus protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor. Cell 1997;89(7):1043–1053.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alves G, Limbourg-Bouchon B, Tricoire H et al. Modulation of Hedgehog target gene expression by the Fused serine-threonine kinase in wing imaginal discs. Mech Dev 1998;78(1–2):17–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Denef N, Neubuser D, Perez L et al. Hedgehog induces opposite changes in turnover and subcellular localization of patched and smoothened. Cell 2000;102(4):521–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalderon D. Hedgehog signalling: Costal-2 bridges the transduction gap. Curr Biol 2004;14:R67–R69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann RK, Beachy PA. Novel lipid modifications of secreted protein signals. Annu Rev Biochem 2004;73:891–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McMahon AP. More surprises in the hedgehog signaling pathway. Cell 2000;100:185–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Han C, Belenkaya TY, Wang B et al. Drosophila glypicans control the cell-to-cell movement of Hedgehog by a dynamin-independent process. Development 2004;131(3):601–611.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Burke R, Nellen D, Bellotto M et al. Dispatched, a novel sterol-sensing domain protein dedicated to the release of cholesterol-modified hedgehog from signaling cells. Cell 1999;99(7):803–815.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bellaiche Y, The I, Perrimon N. Tout-velu is a Drosophila homologue of the putative tumour suppressor EXT-1 and is needed for Hh diffusion. Nature 1998;394:85–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gallet A, Rodriguez R, Ruel L et al. Cholesterol modification of hedgehog is required for trafficking and movement, revealing an asymmetric cellular response to hedgehog. Dev Cell 2003;4(2):191–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. St-Jacques B, Dassule HR, Karavanova I et al. Sonic hedgehog signaling is essential for hair development. Curr Biol 1998;8:1058–1068.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wolff C, Roy S, Ingham PW. Multiple muscle cell identities induced by distinct levels and timing of hedgehog activity in the zebrafish embryo. Curr Biol 2003;13(14):1169–1181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng SY, Bishop JM. Suppressor of Fused represses Gli-mediated transcription by recruiting the SAP18-mSin3 corepressor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(8):5442–5447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Karpen HE, Bukowski JT, Hughes T et al. The sonic hedgehog receptor patched associates with caveolin-1 in cholesterol-rich microdomains of the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem 2001;276(22):19503–19511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis PM, Dunn MP, McMahon JA et al. Cholesterol modification of sonic hedgehog is required for long-range signaling activity and effective modulation of signaling by Ptcl. Cell 2001;105(5):599–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chuang PT, McMahon AP. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature 1999;397(6720):617–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee CS, Buttitta L, Fan CM. Evidence that the WNT-inducible growth arrest-specific gene 1 encodes an antagonist of sonic hedgehog signaling in the somite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98(20):11347–11352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Berman DM, Karhadkar SS, Maitra A et al. Widespread requirement for Hedgehog ligand stimulation in growth of digestive tract tumours. Nature 2003;425(6960):846–851.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Watkins DN, Berman DM, Burkholder SG et al. Hedgehog signalling within airway epithelial progenitors and in small-cell lung cancer. Nature 2003;422(6929):313–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Orenic TV, Slusarski DC, Kroll KL et al. Cloning and characterisation of the segment polarity gene cubitis interruptus dominant of Drosophila. Genes Dev 1990;4:1053–1067.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim JH, Kim PCW, Hui C-C. The VACTERL association: Lessons from the sonic hedgehog pathway. Clin Genet 2001;59:306–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Briscoe J, Ericson J. The specification of neuronal identity by graded Sonic Hedgehog signalling. Semin Cell Dev Biol 1999;10(3):353–362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brewster R, Lee J, Ruiz i Altaba A. Gli/Zic factors pattern the neural plate by defining domains of cell differentiation. Nature 1998;393(6685):579–583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sasaki H, Hui C, Nakafuku M et al. A binding site for Gli proteins is essential for HNF-3beta floor plate enhancer activity in transgenics and can respond to Shh in vitro. Development 1997;124(7):1313–1322.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Meyer NP, Roelink H. The amino-terminal region of Gli3 antagonizes the Shh response and acts in dorsoventral fate specification in the developing spinal cord. Dev Biol 2003;257(2):343–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Park HL, Bai C, Platt KA et al. Mouse Glil mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation. Development 2000;127(8):1593–1605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mo R, Freer AM, Zinyk DL et al. Specific and redundant functions of Gli2 and Gli3 zinc finger genes in skeletal patterning and development. Development 1997;124(1):113–123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ruiz I Altaba A, Palma V, Dahmane N. Hedgehog-Gli signalling and the growth of the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3(1):24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Echelard Y, Epstein DJ, St-Jacques B et al. Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell 1993;75(7):1417–1430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Teillet MA, Lapointe F, Le Douarin NM. The relationships between notochord and floor plate in vertebrate development revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95(20):11733–11738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ahlgren SC, Bronner-Fraser M. Inhibition of sonic hedgehog signaling in vivo results in craniofacial neural crest cell death. Curr Biol 1999;9(22):1304–1314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Borycki AG, Brunk B, Tajbakhsh S et al. Sonic hedgehog controls epaxial muscle determination through Myf5 activation. Development 1999;126(18):4053–4063.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wechsler-Reya RJ, Scott MP. Control of neuronal precursor proliferation in the cerebellum by Sonic Hedgehog. Neuron 1999;22(1):103–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rowitch DH, S-Jacques B, Lee SM et al. Sonic hedgehog regulates proliferation and inhibits differentiation of CNS precursor cells. J Neurosci 1999;19(20):8954–8965.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E et al. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 1993;75(7):1401–1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Buscher D, Ruther U. Expression profile of Gli family members and Shh in normal and mutant mouse limb development. Dev Dyn 1998;211(1):88–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnson DR. Extra-toes: Anew mutant gene causing multiple abnormalities in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1967;17(3):543–581.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Nakamura T, Aikawa T et al. Hedgehog proteins stimulate chondrogenic cell differentiation and cartilage formation. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15(9):1659–1668.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Jorgensen C, Noel D, Gross G. Could inflammatory arthritis be triggered by progenitor cells in the joints? Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:6–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Walterhouse DO, Lamm MLG, Villavicencio E et al. Emerging roles for Hedgehog-Patched-Gli signal transduction in reproduction. Biol Reprod 2003;69:8–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lewis MT, Ross S, Strickland PA et al. Defects in mouse mammary gland development caused by conditional haploinsufficiency of Patched-1. Development 1999;126(22):5181–5193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang Y, Kalderon D. Hedgehog acts as a somatic stem cell factor in the Drosophila ovary. Nature 2001;410(6828):599–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bitgood MJ, Shen L, McMahon AP. Sertoli cell signaling by Desert hedgehog regulates the male germline. Curr Biol 1996;6(3):298–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Berman DM, Desai N, Wang X et al. Roles for Hedgehog signaling in androgen production and prostate ductal morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2004;267(2):387–398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lamm ML, Catbagan WS, Laciak RJ et al. Sonic hedgehog activates mesenchymal Glil expression during prostate ductal bud formation. Dev Biol 2002;249(2):349–366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Grindley JC, Bellusci S, Perkins D et al. Evidence for the involvement of the Gli gene family in embryonic mouse lung development. Dev Biol 1997;188(2):337–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Fukuda K, Yasugi S. Versatile roles for sonic hedgehog in gut development. J Gastroenterol 2002;37(4):239–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pappu KS, Chen R, Middlebrooks BW et al. Mechanism of hedgehog signaling during Drosophila eye development. Development 2003;130(13):3053–3062.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Takabatake Y, Takabatake T, Sasagawa S et al. Conserved expression control and shared activity between cognate T-box genes Tbx2 and Tbx3 in connection with Sonic hedgehog signaling during Xenopus eye development. Dev Growth Differ 2002;44(4):257–271.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Stenkamp DL, Frey RA, Mallory DE et al. Embryonic retinal gene expression in sonic-you mutant zebrafish. Dev Dynamics 2002;225(3):344–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Koyama E, Wu C, Shimo T et al. Chick limbs with mouse teeth: An effective in vivo culture system for tooth germ development and analysis. Dev Dynamics 2003;226(1):149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Liu HX, Maccallum DK, Edwards C et al. Sonic hedgehog exerts distinct, stage-specific effects on tongue and taste papilla development. Dev Biol 2004;276(2):280–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Miura H, Kusakabe Y, Sugiyama C et al. Shh and Ptc are associated with taste bud maintenance in the adult mouse. Mech Dev 2001;106(1–2):143–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. LaMantia AS, Bhasin N, Rhodes K et al. Mesenchymal/epithelial induction mediates olfactory pathway formation. Neuron 2000;28(2):411–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Nanba D, Nakanishi Y, Hieda Y. Role of Sonic hedgehog signaling in epithelial and mesenchymal development of hair follicles in an organ culture of embryonic mouse skin. Dev Growth Differ 2003;45(3):231–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Mill P, Mo R, Fu H et al. Sonic hedgehog-dependent activation of Gli2 is essential for embryonic hair follicle development. Genes Dev 2003;17(2):282–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Herzog W, Zeng X, Lele Z et al. Adenohypophysis formation in the zebrafish and its dependence on sonic hedgehog. Dev Biol 2003;254(1):36–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Pola R, Ling LE, Silver M et al. The morphogen Sonic hedgehog is an indirect angiogenic agent upregulating two families of angiogenic growth factors. Nat Med 2001;7(6):706–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Logan M, Pagan-Westphal SM, Smith DM et al. The transcription factor Pitx2 mediates situs-specific morphogenesis in response to left-right asymmetric signals. Cell 1998;94(3):307–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Shah DK, Hager-Theodorides AL, Outram SV et al. Reduced thymocyte development in sonic hedgehog knockout embryos. J Immunol 2004;172(4):2296–2306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Dahmane N, Sanchez P, Gitton Y et al. The Sonic Hedgehog-Gli pathway regulates dorsal brain growth and tumorigenesis. Development 2001;128(24):5201–5212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Thayer SP, di Magliano MP, Heiser PW et al. Hedgehog is an early and late mediator of pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis. Nature 2003;425(6960):851–856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ellis T, Smyth I, Riley E et al. Overexpression of Sonic Hedgehog suppresses embryonic hair follicle morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2003;263(2):203–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Kim PC, Mo R, Hui CCC. Murine models of VACTERL syndrome: Role of sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36(2):381–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Motoyama J, Liu J, Mo R et al. Essential function of Gli2 and Gli3 in the formation of lung, trachea and oesophagus. Nat Genet 1998;20(1):54–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Unger S, Copland I, Tibboel D et al. Down-regulation of sonic hedgehog expression in pulmonary hypoplasia is associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Pathol 2003;162(2):547–555.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, C.E., Howie, S.E. (2006). Introduction. In: Shh and Gli Signalling and Development. Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39957-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics