Skip to main content

The Third Degree and the Origins of Psychological Interrogation in the United States

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law & Psychology ((PILP,volume 20))

Abstract

On August 1, 1930, Christine Colletti was murdered and left lying on the side of an abandoned road with five bullet wounds (e.g., Leo, 1994). Shortly after learning of his wife’s death the next day, Tony Colletti, an 18-year-old Cleveland resident, accompanied plainclothes detectives to police headquarters for what he was told would be routine questioning. During the car ride to the station, Detectives Corso and Welch told Colletti that they knew “what really happened,” instructing Colletti to “come clean” and tell them about the murder. Colletti responded, as he would continue to do many times over the next two days, that he did not know what the detectives were talking about, explaining that he had last seen his wife the night before and was as surprised as everyone else to learn of her murder.

I thank Dan Lassiter and Welsh White for helpful comments and Brynn Nodarse for helpful research assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ageloff, H. ( 1928, November 28). The third degree. New Republic. p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arther, R. O., & Caputo, R. (1959). Interrogation for investigators. New York: Copp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into princes: Neurolinguistic programming. Moab, Utah: Real People Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becton, C. L. (1987). The drug courier profile: ‘all seems infected that thnfected spy, as all looks yellow to the jaundic’d eye.’ North Carolina Law Review, 65, 417–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, T. A. (1910). Administration of criminal law: Third degree system. The Annals of the American Academy, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (1927). You can’t win. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolus, W. F. (1910). The sweating or third degree system. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 36, 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, B. (1930). Confessions and methods employed in procuring them. Southern California Law Review, 4, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (1989). Instant rapport. California: Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckwalter, A. (1983). Interviews & interrogations. Boston: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs (1985, August). Polygraphs in employment, part V: The experts debate the issues. (No. 1127, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, A. (1930). Memoirs of a murder man. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carte, G., & Carte, E. (1975). Police reform in the united states: The era of August Vollmer, 1905–1932. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafee, Z. (1931, November). Remedies for the third degree. Atlantic Monthly. pp. 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisolm, B. O., & Hart, H. H. (1922). Methods of obtaining confessions and information from persons accused of crime. The Fifty-First Congress of the American Prison Association (pp. 3–19 ). New York City: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Oakland, Police Department (1999). Advanced interviewing techniques. Unpublished interrogation training manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. L., & Eubank E. (1927). Lockstep and corridor: Thirty-five years of prison life. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, M. (1985). Search and seizure by the numbers: The drug courier profile and judicial review of investigative formulas. Boston University Law Review, 65, 843–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, J. (2000). Unspeakable acts, ordinary people: The dynamics of torture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, T. J. (1988). Police professionalism: The renaissance of American law enforcement. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, D. C. (1976). The blue and the brass: American policing, 1890–1910. Gaithersburg, MD.: International Association of Chiefs of Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1910). Thomas Byrnes and the ‘Third Degree.’ Bench and Bar, 21, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaschetti, M. (1930a). The third degree as a cop sees it, New York World, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaschetti, M. ( 1930b, March 8). Forced convictions, New York Telegram, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaschetti, M. (1930c). You gotta be rough: The adventures of detective Fiaschetti of the Italian squad. New York: Doubleday, Doran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelson, R. (1977). Big-city police. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J., & Frank, B. (1957). Not guilty. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C. (1970). The third degree. London: Robert Hale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. (1993). Crime and punishment in American history. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N., & Fleisher, W. (2002). Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L. A. (1961). The use of drugs in interrogation. In A. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behavior (pp. 96–141 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M. H. (1976). Historical roots of police behavior: Chicago, 1890–1925. Law & Society Review, 10, 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W. (1981, March). The subtle art of persuasion. Police Magazine, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Law Review (1930). The third degree. Harvard Law Review, 43, 617–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, G. (1924). Keys to crookdom. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J. (1997). Interviewing and interrogation for law enforcement. Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. (2003). Criminal interrogation: A modern format for interrogating criminal suspects based on the intellectual approach. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, E. J. (1931). Our lawless police: A study of the unlawful enforcement of the law. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E. (1942). Lie detection and criminal interrogation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E. (1948). Lie detection and criminal interrogation. ( 2nd ed. ). Baltimore: William & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., & Reid, J. (1953). Lie detection and criminal interrogation. ( 3rd ed. ). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., & Reid, J. (1962). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., & Reid, J. (1967). Criminal interrogation and confessions. ( 2nd ed. ). Baltimore: William & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., Reid, J., & Buckley J. P. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions ( 3rd ed. ). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., Reid, J., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. ( 4th ed. ). Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Police Magazine ( 1911, August). Police methods and their critics. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAG Irving, B., & Hilgendorf, L. (1980). Police interrogation: The psychological approach. Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure Research Study No. 1. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, B. (1986). The psychological principles of criminal interrogation. In F. E. Inbau, J. Reid, & J. P. Buckley (Eds.), Criminal interrogation and confessions. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. (1979). Policing the urban underworld: The impact of crime on the development of the American police, 1800–1887. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology (1912). The Third Degree., 2, pp. 605–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamisar, Y. (1980). Police interrogation and confessions: Essays in law and policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogation and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., & Fong, C. (1999). I’m innocent: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keedy, E. (1937). The third degree and legal interrogation of suspects. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 85, 761–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, W. R. (1940). Police interrogation. New York: Basuino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. (1984). Lie-detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 766–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. A. (1932). Lying and its detection: A study of deception and deception tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, E. (1930). The third degree: A detailed and appalling expose of police brutality. New York: Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, E. (1936). Secrets of the metropolitan police. Garden City: Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. D. (1953). The instrumental detection of deception: The lie-test. Springfield: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (1992). From coercion to deception: The changing nature of police interrogation in America. Crime, Law and Social Change: An International Journal, 18, 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (1994). Police interrogation in America: A study of violence, civility and social change. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B., & Pucelik, F. (1990). The magic of nlp demystified. Portland: Metamorphous Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limpus, L. W. (1939). Honest cop: Lewis J. Valentine. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Los Angeles Evening Express ( 1929, June 7). Confessions to be doubted: Many secured by torture. p. 3.MAG

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J., & Michaud, D. (1987). The confessions: Interrogation and criminal profiles for police officers. Denver: Apache Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J., & Michaud, D. (1992). Criminal interrogation. Denver: Apache Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, D. (1929). The technique of the American detective. The Annals of the American Academy, 146, 214–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W., & Morris, M. (1988). The Morris dictionary of word and phrase origins. ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S. (1992). Truth or lies: are police officers able to distinguish truthful from deceptive statements? Policing, 8, 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulbar, H. (1951). Interrogation. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. J. (1929). Third degree: Another side of our crime problem. Outlook, 151, 522–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Law Observance and Law Enforcement. (1931). Report on lawlessness in law enforcement. Washington: United States Government Printing Office. New Republic (1930, March 19). American Torquemada. p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J., & Seymour, J. (1990). Introducing neuro-linguistic programming. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, W. (1987). Beyond the golden door. Jamaica, N.Y.: St. Johns University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R. (1989). Coerced confessions: The logic of seemingly irrational action. Cultic Studies Journal, 6, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R., & Leo, R. A. (1997a). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 16, 189–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R., & Leo, R. A. (1997b). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, C. E. (1956). Fundamentals of criminal investigation. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, F. D. (1928). Crime detection. Chicago: O’Sullivan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, M. (1936). American agent. New York: Garden City Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabon, D. (1992). Interviewing and interrogation. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. E., & Inbau, F. E. (1977). Truth and deception: The polygraph (“lie-detector”) technique. (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. E. (1991a). The Reid technique: Interviewing and interrogation. Unpublished course booklet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. E. (1991b). The Reid technique of specialized interrogation strategies. Unpublished course booklet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. E. (1994). The Reid technique of interviewing and interrogation. Promotional brochure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppetto, T. A. (1978). The blue parade. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, S. A., & Solomon, R. (1987). Subconscious rapport building: Another approach to interviewing. The Police Chief 19, 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1987). The magic of rapport. California: Meta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risinger, M., & Loop, J. (2002). Three card monte, monty hall, modus operandi and “offender profiling”: Some lessons of modern cognitive science for the law of evidence. Cardozo Law Review, 24, 193–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal, R. F., & Schutt, S. R. (1976). The gentle art of interviewing and interrogation: A professional manual and guide. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, D. (1996). Criminal interrogation: Law and tactics. Nevada: Copperhouse. San Francisco Chronicle (1859, March 27). Confessions of prisoners. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. W. (1948). Legal consequences of the third degree. Ohio State Law Journal, 9, 514–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, A. C. ( 1927. The third degree and crime. The Nation, 124, 666–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1991). Homicide: A year on the killing streets. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H. (1961). Scientific theory and scientific evidence: An analysis of lie detection. Yale Law Journal, 70, 694–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H. (1982). Deception by police Criminal Justice Ethics, 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. (1986). Zechariah Chafee, Jr.: Defender of liberty and law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, W. (1976). Where the money was. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, R. (1910, May 10–13). A history of the ‘sweat box’ and ’third degree.’ Proceedings of the international Association of Chiefs of Police, 17th Annual Convention. Reprinted in J. H. Wigmore (1913), The principles of judicial proof (pp. 550–551 ). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trovillo, P. V. (1938). A history of lie-detection. American Journal of Police Science, 29, 848–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trovillo, P. V. (1939). A history of lie-detection. American Journal of Police Science, 30, 104–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. (1979). Law and the crystal ball: Predicting behavior with statistical inference and individualized judgment. Yale Law Journal, 88, 1408–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagner, E. L. (1938). New York Detective. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villard, O. G. (1927, October). Official lawlessness: The third degree and the crime wave. Harpers Magazine, 155, 605–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M., Ayres, D. W., Hess, M. S., & Whitebread, C. H. (1967). Interrogations in new haven: The impact of Miranda. The Yale Law Journal, 76, 1519–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1977). A critical history of police reform: The emergence of professionalism. Kentucky: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1980). Popular justice: A history of American criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. (2003). Principles of kinesic interview and interrogation ( 2nd ed. ). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling, G. (1887). Recollections of a New York chief of police. New York: Caxton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, B. (1961). Police interrogation of arrested persons: A skeptical view. In C. R. Sowle (Ed.), police power and individual freedom (pp. 153–181 ). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (1979). Police trickery in inducing confessions. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 581–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (1998). What is an involuntary confession now? Rutgers Law Review, 2001–2057.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (2001). Miranda’s waning protections: Police interrogation practices after Dickerson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklander, D. (1979). Behavioral interviews to a confession. Police Chief, 10, 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklander, D. (1980). Behavioral analysis. Security World, 13, 141–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemse, C. (1931). Behind the green lights. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L., & Kassin, S. (1993): Confessions in the courtroom. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeschke, C. L. (1993). Interviewing: A forensic guide to interrogation. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. (1971). Coercion and compliance: The psychology of police confessions. In C. Perruci & M. Pilisuk (Eds.), The triple revolution (pp. 492–508 ). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E., & Frase, R. (1979). The criminal justice system: Legal materials. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulawski, D., & Wicklander, D. (2002). Practical aspects of interview and interrogation ( 2nd ed. ). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leo, R.A. (2004). The Third Degree and the Origins of Psychological Interrogation in the United States. In: Lassiter, G.D. (eds) Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-38598-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics