Skip to main content

Globalization and Emerging Markets

The Challenge of Continuous Global Network Optimization

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 98))

Abstract

In pursuit of new revenue opportunities and lower-cost operations, manufacturers around the world are creating ever-more complex global networks of sourcing, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and service, and research and development activities. Over the last two years, we have monitored the development of such networks through our global benchmark studies of the global operations of nearly 800 manufacturers based in North America, Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, South Africa, and Asia-Pacific. These companies represent a broad range of industries, including consumer business, automotive, hightech, diversified industrials, pharmaceuticals, and the chemical process sector, and together account for about $1 trillion in global sales.1

Our research finds that most companies have made little progress in optimizing their operations from a global perspective. Rather than take a holistic view in the expansion and optimization of their global networks - the complex web of suppliers, production and R&D facilities, distribution centers, sales subsidiaries, channel partners, and customers, and flows of goods, services, information, and finance that link them - most global manufacturers focus on fixing individual pieces of the network. In spite of launching many improvement initiatives across their global operations, most are overwhelmed by increasing strategic and operational complexity. And the complexity will only increase as companies their global expansion efforts - as research indicates they will. The problem is that those who let their global footprint grow without continuously determining how the various pieces of their operations should be redesigned, rationalized and optimized unwittingly build in huge redundant costs while losing opportunities for higher growth and profits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For further details on this research, see Deloitte Research, Unlocking the Value of Globalization: Profiting from Continuous Optimazation (New York and London, 2005) upon which study this chapter is based.

    Google Scholar 

  2. New products are defined as products introduced over the last three years. See also Deloitte Research, Mastering Innovation: Exploiting Ideas for Profitable Growth (New York and London, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See also Deloitte Research, Prospering in the Secure Economy (New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. By some estimates, the company experienced a US$110 million loss in revenue due to the incident. See “Sony: Dutch authorities seized PlayStations; cadmium fears,” Dow Jones International News, December 4, 2001. See also “Sony faces PS One dilemma in Europe,” Consumer Electronics, December 10, 2001. For more information on Sony’s work on corporate social responsibility, see Sony, CSR 2004, http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/Environment/environment/communication/report/2004/qfhh7c0000001v99-att/csr2004_E.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For details, see “Directive 2000/53/EC Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles,” Official Journal of the European Communities, L 269/34, October 21, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Duncan Austin, Niki Rosinski, Amanda Sauer, Colin Le Duc, Changing Drivers: The impact of climate change on competitiveness and value creation in the automative industry (Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute (WRI) and Sustainable Asset Management (SAM), 2003). Estimates are based on WRI’s metholodogy of assessing the risks and opportunities of carbon constraints due to increased regulation needed to achieve emissions reductions and fuel efficiency demands. The ‘value exposure’ assessment measures risk due to increased costs from improving fuel efficiency of vehicles already sold.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Duncan Austin, Niki Rosinski, Amanda Sauer, Colin Le Duc, Changing Drivers: The impact of climate change on competitiveness and value creation in the automative industry (Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute (WRI) and Sustainable Asset Management (SAM), 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH) was outlined in a February 2001 white paper and subsequently adopted by the European Commission. See The Commission of the European Communities, White Paper, “Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy,” COM(2001) 88 Final, February 27, 2001. For further information, see http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/chemicals/reach.htm. The REACH proposal will replace more than 40 existing directives and regulations with a single, integrated system in which 30,000 chemicals would need to be registered. Under this system, companies that produce and import chemicals will need to assess the risks to the human health and the environment and take steps to manage any risks identified, thereby shifting the burden of proof for ensuring the safety of chemicals on the market from public authorities to industry. See Karen Wontner, “Far-reaching proposals,” Supply Management, January 8, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Demetri Sevastopulo, “Concern at US efforts on chemicals law,” The Financial Times, April 6, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also, Deloitte Research, Performance Amid Uncertainty in Global Manufacturing: Competing Today While Positioning for Tomorrow (New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  11. On network optimization, see also an extensive treatment by David Simchi-Levi, Philip Kaminsky, and Edith Simchi-Levi, Managing the Supply Chain: The Definitive Guide for the Business Professional (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See e.g. Gary Rivlin, “Dell bucks the outsourcing trend,” The New York Times, December 20, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Virginia Postrel, “Operation everything: it stocks your grocery store, schedules your favorite team’s games, and helps plan your vacation. A primer on the most influential academic discipline you’ve never heard of,” The Boston Globe, June 27, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For evidence, see e.g. Deloitte Research, Mastering Complexity in Global Manufacturing: Powering Profits and Growth through Value Chain Synchronization (New York and London, 2003); and Deloitte Research, The Challenge of Complexity in Global Manufacturing: Critical Trends in Supply Chain Management (New York and London, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Deloitte Research, Mastering Complexity in Global Manufacturing: Powering Profits and Growth through Value Chain Synchronization (New York and London, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Before the end of the second quarter of 2004, automakers will have recalled more than 14 million units in North America, exceeding the total of 2003 by 2.5 million, with warranty expenses exceeding manufacturers’ annual profits. Source: AMR Research and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). See Kevin Mixer, Joe Souza, and Fenella Scott, “Early warning solutions: A transformation roadmap,” AMR Research, June 21, 2004). Narishiko Shirouzu and Sebastian Moffet, “As Toyota closes in on GM, quality concerns also grow,” Wall Street Journal, August 4, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Phil Tinari, “Hung up: Multinational cell phone makers figured they knew best how to sell their products. Then they got to China,” Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also Deloitte Research, The World’s Factory: China Enters the 21st Century (New York: Deloitte, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Merrill Douglas, “The total cost of global sourcing: Ingersoll-Rand scopes out the full cost of sourcing from different overseas suppliers,” LIT Toolkit, February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For more evidence of this “innovation paradox,” see Deloitte Research, Mastering Innovation: Exploiting Ideas for Profitable Growth (New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See “Spurious automobile parts industry turning ‘organised’,” India Business Insight, December 5, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Tim Trainer, “Counterfeiting and theft of tangible intellectual property: challenges and solutions,” International Anti Counterfeiting Coalition Inc., Washingtion DC, March 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Joann Muller, “Stolen cars,” Forbes, February 16, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See “Bogus batteries pose safety threat,” The Vancouver Sun, December 12, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. For more details, see Deloitte Research, Mastering Innovation: Exploiting Ideas for Profitable Growth (New York and London, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See also Eric Sherman, “Taking intellectual property seriously: there’s more at stake in protecting and selling your IP than you may think,” Chief Executive, Vol. 203, November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Gordon V. Smith, and Russell L. Parr, Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, 3rd Edition (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. See “Let’ have a level playing field: Not even Harley-Davidson can penetrate China’s market,” Manufacturing and Technology News, April 2, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For a discussion, see “EU customs distinction between plasma monitors and televisions under discussion,” TDC Trade, March 19, 2004. http://www.tdctrade.com/alert/eu0405.htm. See also Jennifer L. Schenker, “EU may redefine the computer screen,” International Herald Tribune, May 20, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See also “HP, Dell, IBM and Leading Suppliers Release Electronics Industry Code of Conduct; Global Supply Chain Standards Promote Socially Responsible Business Practices,” Business Wire, October 21, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Duncan Austin, Niki Rosinski, Amanda Sauer, Colin Le Duc, Changing Drivers: The Impact Of Climate Change On Competitiveness And Value Creation In The Automotive Industry (Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute (WRI) and Sustainable Asset Management (SAM), 2003). See also “The Drivers: How to Navigate the Auto Industry,” Deutsche Bank AG, July 31, 2002, for a discussion of the strategic implications of Toyota’s leadership in environmental technology.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Duncan Austin, Niki Rosinski, Amanda Sauer, Colin Le Duc, Changing Drivers: The Impact Of Climate Change On Competitiveness And Value Creation In The Automotive Industry (Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute (WRI) and Sustainable Asset Management (SAM), 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kevin G. Revitte and David Kline, “Discovering new value in intellectual property,” Harvard Business Review, January–February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See e.g. Larry Shutzberg, RFID in the Consumer Goods Supply Chain: Mandated Compliance or Remarkable Innovation?, Industry White Paper, October 2004. http//www.packagingdigest.com/newsite/Online/RFID_IWP.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  35. See e.g. “Dupont Canada Develops Breakthrough Product at Half the Cost Thanks to Canada’s R&D Tax Credits,” Advanced Materials Draft Paper, Canadian Chemical Producers Association, September 10, 2002, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  36. From P. Koudal, H. Lee, B. Peleg, P. Rajwat, S. Whang, and R. Tully, “General Motors: Building a Digital Loyalty Network Through Demand and Supply Chain Integration,” Stanford Case Study, January 1, 2003. See also Deloitte Research and Stanford Global Supply Chain Management Forum, Integrating Demand and Supply Chains in the Global Automotive Industry: Building a Digital Loyalty Network at General Motors (New York, 2003). For further information, see Laurie Sullivan, “Business integration-car maker takes global approach,” Computing, September 30, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  37. For more on the complexity masters, see Deloitte Research, Mastering Complexity in Global Manufacturing: Powering Profits and Growth through Value Chain Synchronization (New York and London, 2003). See also Deloitte Research, Mastering Innovation: Exploiting Ideas for Profitable Growth (New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koudal, P., Engel, D.A. (2007). Globalization and Emerging Markets. In: Lee, H.L., Lee, CY. (eds) Building Supply Chain Excellence in Emerging Economies. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 98. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38429-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics