Abstract
This paper provides a review of health and environmental effects of GM crops (foods), intellectual property right developments, and regulatory developments for GM crops (foods). Estimates of realized and potential cost reductions are also reported. These estimates show that European Union countries (original EU member countries) have not taken advantage of cost reductions for GM crops to date. More importantly, estimates of potential cost reductions indicate that European Union countries have very low potential cost reduction gains. (Even with 80 percent GM crop adoption cost reductions, gains are around one percent.) However, because EU countries are net importers of many agricultural commodities, EU countries have a major impact on developing countries. Many developing countries in Africa have failed to adopt GM crops because of EU countries’ advice regarding the “precautionary principle.”
Key words
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carpenter, J.E., and L.P. Gianessi. 2001. Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefits Estimates. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, D.C.
Conway, G. 2000. Crop Biotechnology: Benefits, Risks and Ownership. Speech by the President of the Rockefeller Foundation delivered at the OECD Edinburgh Conference on the Scientific and Health Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods. Available online under “news archive” at http://www.rockfound.org (accessed March 2004).
Dreher, K., M. Morris, M. Khairallah, J.M. Ribaut, S. Pandey, and G. Srinivasan. 2000. Is Marker-Assisted Selection Cost-Effective Compared to Conventional Plant Breeding Methods? The Case of Quality Protein Maize. Paper presented at the 4th 1CABR Conference on Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ravello, Italy, August 24–28.
Duffy, M. 2001. Who Benefits from Biotechnology? Paper presented at the American Seed Trade Association meeting, Chicago, IL, December 5–7. Available online at http:// www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubinfo/papersspeeches/biotech.html (accessed March 2004).
Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 1997. “Genetic Resources, International Organizations, and Rice Varietal Improvement.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 45(3): 471–500.
Falck-Zepeda, J.B., G. Traxler, and R.G. Nelson. 1999. Rent Creation and Distribution from the First Three Years of Planting Bt Cotton. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) Briefs No. 14, Ithaca, NY.
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and W.D. McBride. 2000. Genetically Engineered Crops for Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture: Farm Level Effects. Agricultural Economic Report No. 786, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Gianessi, L.P., C.S. Silvers, S. Sankula, and J.E. Carpenter. 2002. Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, D.C.
James, C. 2002. Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2002. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) Briefs No. 27, Ithaca, NY.
Pray, C.E., and J. Huang. 2003. “The Impact of Bt Cotton in China.” In N. Kalaitzandonakes, ed., The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Academic Publishers.
Qaim, M., and A. de Janvry. 2003. “Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers’ Adoption: The Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(4): 814–828.
Qaim, M., and G. Traxler. 2005. “Roundup Ready Soybeans in Argentina: Farm Level, Environmental, and Welfare Effect.” Agricultural Economics 32(1): 73–86.
Qaim, M., and D. Zilberman. 2003. “Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries.” Science 299(5608): 900–902.
Runge, C.F., and B. Ryan. “The Global Diffusion of Plant Biotechnology: International Adoption and Research in 2004.” Report prepared for the Council on Biotechnology Information, Washington, D.C. (December 8, 2004).
Traxler, G., S. Godoy-Avila, J. Falck-Zepeda, and J. Espinoza-Arellano. 2003. “Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: Economic and Environmental Impacts.” In N. Kalaitzandonakes, ed., The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evenson, R.E. (2006). Status of Agricultural Biotechnology: An International Perspective. In: Just, R.E., Alston, J.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36952-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36953-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)