Abstract
Our central hypothesis is that partners who jointly work on a task in a computer-mediated setting following a collaboration script, can acquire collaborative skills that will help to improve the collaboration in subsequent tasks as well as their outcome. In an experimental study, a collaboration script was provided for a first computer-mediated collaboration in one experimental condition. Meantime, in a different experimental condition, the collaborators observed a model-collaboration. Learning effects of script and model were expected to become evident in the process and outcome of a second, unscripted computer-mediated collaboration. Compared to two control conditions (a condition with unsupported collaboration during the learning phase and a condition without a learning phase) both the script condition and the model condition showed positive effects on process and outcome during the application phase. This leads to the conclusion that collaboration scripts can indeed constitute a promising instructional method to promote collaborative competences and to improve subsequent computer-mediated collaboration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, A. H., O’Malley, C, Doherty-Sneddon, G., Langton, S., Newlands, A., Mullin, J., et al. (1997). The impact of VMC on collaborative problem solving: An analysis of task performance, communicative process, and user satisfaction. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Angiolillo, J. S., Blanchard, H. E., Israelski, E. W., & Mane, A. (1997). A Technology constraints of video mediated communications. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur (Eds.), Video mediated communications (pp. 51–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem-solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59, 87–96.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
Berg, K. F. (1993). Structured cooperative learning and achievement in a high school mathematics class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
Bruhn, J. (2000). Förderung des kooperativen Lernens über Computernetze: Prozess und Lernerfolg beim dyadischen Lernen mit Desktop-Videokonferenzen. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
Bruhn, J., Fischer, F., Gräsel, C, & Mandl, H. (2000). Kooperatives Lernen mit Mapping-Techniken. In H. Mandl & F. Fischer (Eds.), Wissen sichtbar machen. Wissensmanagement mit Mapping-Techniken (pp. 119–132). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Cameron, T., Barrows, H. S., & Crooks, S. M. (1999). Distributed problem-based learning at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference (pp. 86–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies (pp. 103–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M, Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier/Pergamon.
Finn, K. E., Sellen, A.J., & Wilbur, S. B. (Eds.) (1997). Video-mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Greeno, J. G. & the Middle School Mathematics through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
Hermann, F., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2001). Solving the case together: The challenge of net-based interdisciplinary collaboration. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 293–300). Maastricht: McLuhan Institute.
Hesse, F. W., Garsoffsky, B., & Hron, A. (1997). Interface-Design für computerunterstütztes kooperatives Lernen. In L. J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Information und Lernen mit Multimedia (pp. 253–267). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Hron, A., Hesse F. W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computergestützten kollaborativen Lernen. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(1), 56–69.
Köhler, T., & Trimpop, R. (2004). Sehen und gesehen werden: Teleradiologie mittels Desk-top-Videoconferencing. In W. Bungard, B. Koop, & C. Liebig (Eds.), Proceedings zur 3. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie. München: Rainer Hampp.
Kollar, I. (2001). Gewissheits-und Ungewissheitsorientierung beim kooperativen Lernen mit Videokonferenzen-der Einfluss verschiedener Strukturierungsmaßnahmen. Unveröffentlichte Magisterarbeit. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: Institut für Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambrigde, UK: Cambrige University Press.
O’Conaill, B., & Whittaker, S. (1997). Characterizing, predicting and measuring video-mediated communication: A conversational approach. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication (pp. 107–131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O’Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Pfister, H.-R., & Mühlpfordt, M. (2002). Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: The learning protocol approach. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002 Conference (pp. 581–589). Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556.
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 293–315.
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90–108.
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005a). Instructional support for collaboration in desktop video-conference settings: How it can be achieved and assessed. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication-and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005b). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting problem-solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.
Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: the case of the Writing Partner. In P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 289–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scardamalia, M, & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children’s knowledge processing. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (pp. 563–577). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psycho-logical Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
Suthers, D. (2001). Collaborative representations: Supporting face to face and online knowledge-building discourse. Proceedings of the 34 th Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-34), January 3–6, 2001. Maui, Hawaii (CDROM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rummel, N., Spada, H. (2007). Can People Learn Computer-Mediated Collaboration by Following A Script?. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36947-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36949-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)