Advertisement

Visual Representation of Complex Information Structures in High Volume Manufacturing

  • Connor Upton
  • Gavin Doherty
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 221)

Abstract

While research supports the use of graphic data representations in interfaces and control systems, work in this area has focused on relatively small systems with a limited nmnber of variables. This paper describes an approach to designing a visual application for a semiconductor manufacturing plant. This is a complex, large-scale system requiring a structured design methodology. First, using cognitive work analysis techniques an Abstraction Decomposition Space (ADS) of the system is generated. Second, as with ecological interface design, we demonstrate how this ADS can inform the display design. The complexity and scale of the system has required us to make adjustments to both of these frameworks. The resulting display req multiple views of the system, information hiding and user interaction. Tak wider set of analyses onboard, we present a design rationale supportin explicit representation of hierarchies, the compatibility of views and the u contextual navigation.

9 References

  1. 1.
    Woods, D., Johannesen, L, Cook, R., Sarter, N. (1994) Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers and Hindsight CSERIACGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, J. & Nonnan, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hutchins E. (1995). How A Cockpit Remembers its Speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertin, J. (1983) Semiology of Graphics The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. Translated by William J. Berg.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, J. (1996). A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Potter, S. S., Elm, W. C., Roth, E. M., Gualtieri, and J., Easter, J., (2002). Bridging the Gap between Cognitive Analysis and Effective Decision Aiding. In M. D. McNeese and M. A. Vidulich (Eds) State of the Art Report (SOAR): Cognitive Systems Engineering in Miltary Aviation Environments: Avoiding Cogminutia Fragmentosa! Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Human Systems Information Analysis Center. (pp 137-168). Also available at: http://iac.dtic.mil/hsiac/.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vicente, K. J., and Rasmussen, J., “Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-22, pp. 589–606, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bisantz, A. M., and Vicente, K. J., “Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 40, pp. 83–117, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmussen, J. (1979). On the structure of knowledge-A morphology of mental models in a man-machine system context. Rise Report M-2192. Roskilde, Denmark: Riso National Laboratory, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rasmussen, J. (1985). The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 15(2), pp. 234–243.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rasmussen, J (1983). “Skills, rules, knowledge: signals, signs, and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models.” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. Vol. SMC-13.pp.257–267.1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Upton, C. and Doherty, G. (2005) Designing Usable Decision Support Systems for HVM. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Vol. 1, pp. 459–466 Lo Bello, L. and Sauter, T.(Eds.)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Card, S., Mackinlay, J. and Shneiderman, B. (1999) Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waloszek, G. (2004) “Fighting (with) Hierarchies-Part II: Presentation” SAP AG, Product Design Center-04/27/2001, updated 01/29/2004. available at: http://www.sapdesignguild.org/community/desigrl/hierarchies2.aspGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Connor Upton
    • 1
  • Gavin Doherty
    • 1
  1. 1.Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer ScienceTrinity College DublinDublin

Personalised recommendations