Design Sketching for Space and Time

  • Simone Rozzi
  • William Wong
  • Paola Amaldi
  • Peter Woodward
  • Bob Fields
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 221)


In this paper we present a case study of how design sketching can be used as a technique for exploring and creating a common understanding between users, designers and software developers, of the representation design requirements for supporting spatial-temporal reasoning in Air Traffic Control (ATC). The safe and expeditious control of aircraft requires the ATC controller to think in terms of 3D air space, and also plan ahead in time. We refer to this mental process as spatial-temporal reasoning. ATC is a 4D (3D plus time) problem but is currently supported by 2D tools such as the Plan Position Indicator-type radar displays that are seen in ATC centres. This requires the air traffic controllers to construct mental models of the air traffic situation to ensure safe vertical and horizontal separations between moving aircraft, and also expedite traffic flow. These objectives require prediction of traffic patterns and potential bottlenecks. To explain how we used design sketching, we report on the Task Analysis of an exemplar ATC task, and the characterisation of this task in spatial-temporal terms, and how the Ecological Interface Design principle of visualisation of constraints was applied to guide the development of the 4D visual form of the representation design.


Vertical Separation Human Machine Interface Flight Level Approach Controller Cognitive Task Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Endsley, M. R., Smolensky, M. W.: Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control: The Picture. In M. W. Smolensky & E. S. Stein (Eds.): Human Factors in Air Traffic Control. Academic Press, San Diego (1998) 115–150Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, A., Reimann, R.: About face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis (2003) 86Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lauesen, S.: User Interface Design. A Software Engineering Perspective. Addison Wesley, Harlow UK (2005) 167Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rettig, M. Prototyping for Tiny Fingers. Communication of the ACM, April, Vol.37, No. 4 (1994) 23Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ware, C.: Information Visualization. Perception for Design. Elsevier Science, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wickens, C.D., Gordon, S.E. & Liu, Y. Human Factors Engineering. Longman, US (1998) 226–232Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buxton, W.: Sketching and Experience design. Interact 2005, Tenth IFIPT International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Rome 11-12 September (2005) 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hildebrandt, M., Rantanen, E.M.: Time design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting HFES 2004, New Orleans Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica CA (2004)703–707Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slnallman, H. S., & St John, M: Naive realism: Limits of realism as a display principle. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burns, A., Baxter, G.: Time bands in system structure. In Besnard, C., Gacek, C. & C. Jones (eds.): Structure for Dependability: Computer-based Systems from an Interdisciplinary Perspective, Springer. London (2006) 74–90Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmussen, J. Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, Vol. 12. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollnaget, E., Woods, D.D.: Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. FL 33487-2742: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Do, E.Y., Gross, M.D., Neiman, B. and Zimring, C.: Intentions in and relations among design drawings. Design studies Vol. 21 No. 5 (2000) 483–503Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Rozzi
    • 1
  • William Wong
    • 1
  • Paola Amaldi
    • 1
  • Peter Woodward
    • 1
  • Bob Fields
    • 1
  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityHendon LondonUK

Personalised recommendations