Skip to main content

Action Research in A Virtual Setting

Cautions from a Failed Project

  • Chapter
Information Systems Action Research

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 13))

  • 1680 Accesses

Abstract

Virtual teams are used by leading companies around the world to address important business problems and to support critical business operations. However, the best ways of providing leadership and managing technological-based change within these teams remain challenges for the practitioner and research communities. In this project, we describe how, as part of a research team, we participated in an Action Research project within a virtual setting. While we gained insights along the way, ultimately the project failed. From this failure, we draw our personal conclusions about what happened and what Action Researchers may do in the future to avoid such problems again.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8. References

  • Bell, B. S. and S. W. J. Kozlowski (2002). “A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership.” Group & Organization Management 27(1): 14–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, C. D. (2001). “The Mutual Knowledge Problem and its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration.” Organization Science 12(3): 346–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. and R. H. Lengel (1986). “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design.” Management Science 32(5): 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R., M. G. Martinsons and N. Kock (2004). “Principles of Canonical Action Research.” Information Systems Journal 14(1): 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R. and S. T. Kinney (1998). “Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality.” Information Systems Research 9(3): 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. and M. S. Poole (1997). “Transitions in Teamwork in New Organizational Forms.” Advances in Group Processes 14: 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L. and G. Paré (2002). “The Multi-Faceted Nature of Virtual Teams.” Cahier du GReSI 2(11): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furst, S., Blackburn, R., and Rosen, B. (1999). “Virtual Team Effectiveness: a Proposed Research Agenda.” Information Systems Journal 9(4): 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, M. (1998). Managing Virtual Teams: Practical Techniques for High-Technology Project Managers. Boston, MA, Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R., K. Johnson and M. Turoff (1991). “Group Decision Support: The Effects of Designated Human Leaders and Statistical Feedback in Computerized Conferences.” Journal of Management Information Systems 8(2): 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. and S. Kiesler (2002). Distributed Work. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. J. (1999). “Organizational Change and Virtual Teams: Strategic and Operational Integration.” Information Systems Journal 9: 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., K. Knoll and D. E. Leidner (1998). “Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams.” Journal of Management Information Systems 14(4): 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L. and D. E. Leidner (1999). “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams.” Organization Science 10(6): 791–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. K. and M. D. Myers (1999). “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 23(1): 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. and A. Kleinhanns (2001). “Maximizing the Contribution of Diverse Voices in Virtual Teams.” MIT Mindshare: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, E. F., K. B. Kahn and G. Barczak (2001). “An Investigation of the Use of Global, Virtual, and Colocated New Product Development Teams.” The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18(2): 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings and N. L. Chervany (1998). “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 23(3): 473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittleman, D. D., R. O. Briggs and J. F. Nunamaker (2000). “Best Practices in Facilitating Virtual Meetings: Some Notes from Initial Experience.” Group Facilitation 2(2): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. and S. L. Robinson (1997). “When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops.” Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 22(1): 226–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S. and J. Swan (2000). “Trust and Inter-Organizational Networking.” Human Relations 53(10): 1287–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. L. and R. R. McDaniel (2004). “A Field Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance.” MIS Quarterly 28(2): 183–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleen, D. J. (2004). “An Inductively Derived Model of Leader-Initiated Relationship Building with Virtual Team Members.” Journal of Management Information Systems 20(3): 227–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli, G. and B. Ives (2003). “Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams.” MIS Quarterly 27(3): 365–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., G. Piccoli and B. Ives (2004). “Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research.” Database for Advances in Information Systems 35(1): 6–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, R. N. (1970). “Three Dilemmas in Action Research.” Human Relations 23(6): 499–513.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Street, C. T. and D. B. Meister (2004). “Small Business Growth and Internal Transparency: The Role of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 28(3): 473–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G. I. and R. D. Everend (1978). “An Assessment of The Scientific Merits of Action Research.” Administrative Science Quarterly 23(4): 582–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. (1976). Engaging with Large-scale Systems. Experimenting with Organizational Life: The Action Research Approach. A. W. Clark. New York, Plenum Press: x, 259 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyre, M. J. and W. J. Orlikowski (1994). “Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations.” Organization Science 5(1): 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warkentin, M. and P. M. Beranek (1999). “Training to Improve Virtual Team Communication.” Information Systems Journal 9(4): 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, R. D. (2004). “Does Telecommuting Really Increase Productivity?” Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 47(8): 93–96.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S.-S. and R. M. Burton (2000). “Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance?” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 6(4): 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meister, D.B., Gronski, C.M. (2007). Action Research in A Virtual Setting. In: Kock, N. (eds) Information Systems Action Research. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36060-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics