Abstract
The process of knowledge acquisition which has the strongest truth claim is the research process of natural science, based on testing hypotheses to destruction. But the application of this process to phenomena beyond those for which it was developed, namely, the natural regularities of the physical universe, is problematical. For research into social phenomena there is increasing interest in “action research” in various forms. In this process the researcher enters a real-world situation and aims both to improve it and to acquire knowledge. This paper reviews the nature and validity of action research, arguing that its claim to validity requires a recoverable research process based upon a prior declaration of the epistemology in terms of which findings which count as knowledge will be expressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action Science-Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bate, P. (2000). Synthesizing Research and Practice: Using the Action Research Approach in Health Care Settings. Social Policy and Administration, 34(4), 478–493.
Blum, F. H. (1955). Action Research-a scientific approach? Philosophy of Science, 22(1), 1–7.
Campbell, D. T. (1988). Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers edited by E.S. Overman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester: John Wiley.
Checkland, P. (1985). From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(9), 757–767.
Checkland, P. (1991). From Framework Through Experience to Learning: the Essential Nature of Action Research. In H. Nissen, H. K. Klein & R. A. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (pp. 397–403). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Checkland, P. (1997). Rhetoric and Reality in Contracting: research in and on the NHS. In R. Flynn & G. Williams (Eds.), Contracting for Health-Quasi-markets and the National Health Service (pp. incomplete). London: Oxford University Press.
Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. E. (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Clark, A. (1972). Action Research and Organizational Change. London: Harper & Row.
Dash, D. P. (1997). Problems of Action Research, (Working Paper No. 14). University of Lincolnshire and Humberside.
Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (1996). Action Research for the Study of Organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Studies (pp. 526–542). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Engels, P. G. H., & Salomon, M. L. (1997). Facilitating Innovation for Development, Royal Tropical Institute, The Netherlands.
Foster, M. (1972). An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Action Research in Work Organisations. Human Relations, 25(6), 529–556.
Hadfield, M. (2005). Knowledge Production, Its Management and Action Research. Educational Action Research, 13(2), 301–311.
Hult, M., & Lennung, S. (1980). Towards a Definition of Action Research: A Note and a Bibliography. Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 242–250.
Keynes, J. M. (1938). Discussion of R. F. Harrod’s presidential address to the Royal Economic Society. In Moggridge, D. E. (ed.) (1976), Keynes, Fontana/Collins, London.
Kidd, S. A., & Kral, M. J. (2005). Practising Participatory Action Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 187–195.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibrium and Social Change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
Lomax, P. (2002). Action Research. In M. Coleman & A. R. J. Briggs (Eds.), Research Methods in Educational Leadership. London: Paul Chapman.
McNiff, J., with Whitehead, J. (2001). Action Research: Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). London: Routlege Falmer.
Moggridge, D. E. (1976). Keynes. London: Fontana/Collins.
Phillips, D. C. (1992). The Social Scientist’s Bestiary: A Guide to Fabled Threats to, and Defences of, Naturalistic Social Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Reed, J. (2005). Using Action Research in Nursing Practice with Older People: Democratizing Knowledge. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(5), 594–600.
Revans, R. (1972). Hospitals: Communication, Choice and Change. London: Tavistock.
Susman, G. (1983). Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (pp. 95–113). Newbury Park: Sage.
Susman, G., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582–603.
Torbet, W. R. (1991). The Power of Balance: Transforming Self, Society and Scientific Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1979). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Ziman, J. J. (1968). Public Knowledge, an Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science. London: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Checkland, P., Holwell, S. (2007). Action Research. In: Kock, N. (eds) Information Systems Action Research. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36060-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36060-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36059-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36060-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)