Abstract
This paper addresses questions concerning the use of portable computer devices in schools by proposing a framework within which to address the questions, presenting an example, and synthesising the findings of research. The benefits and barriers to implementing portable technologies are discussed leading to some recommendations.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35701-0_35
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291 - 321.
Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., and Wong, Y. T. (1999). Teacher and Teacher-Directed Student Use of Computers and Software. (Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. 3 ). Irvine, California: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine.
Becker, J. P. (2001). The wireless revolution. NEA Today, 19(6), 8 - 10.
Clouse, R. W. and Nelson, H. E. (2000). School reform, constructed learning, and educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(4), 289 - 303.
Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning (Ed.) (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press
Crawford, V. and Vahey, P. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program March 2002Evaluation Report: SRI International.
DeCorte, E. (1990). Learning with new information technologies in schools: Perspectives from the psychology of learning and instruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 6, 69 - 87.
Friedlander, D. (2000). Thin-Client Cost of Ownership: The Numbers Don’t Add Up (Idea Byte). Cambridge, MA 02142, USA: Giga Information Group.
Gardner, J., Morrison, H., Jarman, R., Reilly, C., and McNally, H. (1994a). Learning with portable computers. Computers in Education, 22(1/2), 161 - 171.
Gardner, J., Morrison, H., Jarman, R., Reilly, C., and McNally, H. (1994b). Personal Portable Computers and the Curriculum (Practitioner Minipaper 13 ). Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Good, D. G. (2001). Investing in K- I 2 Technology Equipment: Strategies for State Policymakers (Reports — Evaluative). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
Hannafin, R. D. and Savenye, S. (1993). Technology in the classroom: The teacher’s new role and resistance to it. Educational Technology, 33 (6), 26 - 31.
Harris, C. and Straker, L. (2000). Survey of physical ergonomics issues associated with school children’s use of laptop computers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 337 - 347.
Hill, J., Reeves, T. C., Grant, M., and Wang, S. (2001). The Impact of Portable Technologies on Teaching and Learning: Year Two Report. University of Georgia: Athens Academy.
Hill, J., Reeves, T. C., and Heidemeier, H. (2000). Ubiquitous Computing for Teaching, Learning, and Communicating: Trends, Issues and Recommendations. Athens, Georgia: Department of Instructional Technology, College of Education, The University of Georgia.
Kessell, S. R. (2001). Evaluation of the Personal Laptop Program at Penrhos College [19982000]: Final Report. Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
Loader, D. (1993). Reconstructing an Australian school. The Computing Teacher, 20(7), 12-15.
Metis Associates (1999). Program Evaluation: The New York City Board of Education Community School District Six Laptop Project. New York: Metis Associates.
Newhouse, C. P. (1997). The impact of portable computers on classroom learning environments. Australian Educational Computing, 13(1), 5-11.
Newhouse, C. P. (1998). Teachers’ responses and classroom learning environments associated with student access to portable computers. Unpublished PhD, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Wireless portable technology unlocks the potential for computers to support learning in primary schools. Australian Educational Computing,16(2), 6-13.
OQO Corporation. (2002). OQO Ultrapersonal [online]. OQO Corporation. Available: http://www.ogo.com/ [2002, 3/7/2002].
Rowe, H. A. H. (1993). Learning with personal computers. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D. C. (1992). Teaching in high-tech environments: Classroom management revisited. Journal of Educational Computing Research,8(4), 479-505.
Schank, R. C. and Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vernooy-Gerritsen, M. (1994). Schools with SPIRIT, a new approach to implementation. Brisbane: Australian Computers in Education Conference: APITITE’94.
Walker, L., Rockman, S., and Chessler, M. (2000). A More Complex Picture: Laptop Use and Impact in the Context of Changing Home and School Access (The third in a series of research studies on Microsoft’s Anytime Anywhere Learning Program. 3). San Francisco, CA: Rockman et al.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newhouse, P. (2003). Using Portable Computer Technologies to Support Learning Environments. In: Dowling, C., Lai, KW. (eds) Information and Communication Technology and the Teacher of the Future. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 132. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35701-0_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35701-0_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1041-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35701-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive