Abstract
A range of factors influences decisions about the quality of distance learning, including the theoretical perspectives of learning which are supported, the context of the learning experience, the approaches used for design, development, teaching, assessment and evaluation, the systems and infrastructure available, and the nature of the decision-making process. While developments in educational technology have provided powerful new tools to support learning and teaching, and raised issues about staff development to encourage their appropriate use, this paper focuses on three key concepts (dialogue, reflection and iteration), arguing that they play a pivotal role in determining the quality of the student learning experience at a number of different levels, and that they are especially valuable for considering the quality of the online distance learning experience.
After an initial discussion on the nature of quality in relation to contemporary views of learning and teaching, the paper discusses the above key concepts and applies them to evaluation studies which were undertaken at Monash University as innovations in online distance learning were introduced at subject level. The studies illustrate the importance of these concepts in improving the student learning experience, as well as their role in improving design, development and teaching, and their relevance to assessment and evaluation.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35700-3_33
Chapter PDF
References
Ball, C. (1985). What the hell is quality? In D. Urwin (Ed.), Fitness for purpose: essays in higher education. Guildford: SRHE & NFER-Nelson.
Benson, R. (1997). Approaches to assessing open and distance learners. In T. Evans, V. Jakupec & D. Thompson (Eds.), Research in Distance Education 4: revised papers from the fourth Research in Distance Education (RIDE) Conference, Deakin University 1996. 102–114 Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Benson, R., Hardy, L. & Maxfield, J. (2001) The international classroom: using reflective practice to improve teaching and learning. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.) Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18 Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). 83–92. Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne.
Benson, R. & Hewitt, L. (1998) Breaking down the barriers: developing online communication in an offline environment. In R. Corderoy (Ed.), ASCILITE ′98. Flexibility: the next wave? Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). 75–85. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
Benson R. & de Zwart, M. (2000) The experience of online learning: evaluating the effectiveness of an innovation in web-based legal education. In R. Sims, M. O’Reilly& S. Sawkins (Eds.), Learning to Choose: Choosing to Learn. Proceedings of the 17 Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). 425–434. Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE & OUP.
Boud, D.J., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (Eds.) (1985). Reflection: turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer Press.
Dewey, J. (1972). Experience and education (originally published in 1938 by Kappa Delta Pi). New York: Collier.
Evans, T. & Nation, D. (1989). Dialogue in the theory, practice and research of distance education. Open Learning, 4 (2): 37–46.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
Mason, R. (1991). Analysing computer conferencing interactions. Computers in Adult Education and Training, 2 (3): 161–173.
Morgan, A. (1993). Improving your students’ learning: reflections on the experience of study. London: Kogan Page.
Nunan, T. & Calvert, J. (1992). Report of the project to investigate quality and standards in distance education. University of South Australia and Deakin University.
Nunan, T. (1993). The quality of distance education: what does it mean and how can it be judged? In T. Nunan (Ed.), Distance education futures: selected papers from the 11th Biennial Forum of the Australian and South Pacific External Studies Association. 483–499. Adelaide: University of South Australia.
Nunan, T. & Calvert, J. (1992). Report of the project to investigate quality and standards in distance education. University of South Australia and Deakin University.
Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE & OUP.
Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. London: Kogan Page.
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Thorpe, M. (1998). Assessment and ‘third generation’ distance education. Distance Education, 19 (2): 265–286.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benson, R. (2003). Improving the quality of distance education through online learning. In: Davies, G., Stacey, E. (eds) Quality Education @ a Distance. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 131. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35700-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35700-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1039-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35700-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive