Abstract
While participatory design in IS has found increasing acceptance, the role of participation in social arena has been lively debated in recent years. Development projects in the third world based on “western” assumptions have elicited sharp critiques, with consequent policy shift towards involving the poor people and local communities in these endeavours. In India, policies and programs aimed at reclamation of degraded lands, a priority thrust area which is directly linked to poverty alleviation, are typically controlled by central, state and local government bureaucracies, with little involvement, until recently, of the affected people. Some of these programs have attempted to use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to model alternative development possibilities, and to then prepare action plans based on scientific knowledge for field implementation. These initiatives too have generally been bereft of end-user involvement. On the other hand, land development has been successfully carried out at several places in the country through community initiatives alone by harnessing indigenous knowledge. In this paper, we briefly present the continuum of participatory development through analysis of two contrasting case studies. The analysis leads to the challenge of integrating local knowledge within governmental institutional frameworks that can facilitate the larger spread of land reclamation efforts.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Aronoff, S. Geographical Information Systems: A Managerial Perspective, Ottawa, Canada: WDL Publications, 1995.
Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution”, Organization Studies, (18: 1 ), 1997, pp. 93–117.
Bhatnagar, B. and Williams, A. “Participatory Development and the World Bank: Potential Directions for Change”, The World Bank, Washington D.C., 1992.
Binder, T., Gregory, J., Wagner, I. (eds.) PDC’2002 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmo, Sweden, June 2002.
Blaikie, P. and Brookfield, H. Land Degradation and Society, London: Methuen, 1987.
Butler, T. and Fitzgerald, B. “The Relationship Between User Participation and the Management of Change Surrounding the Development of Information Systems: A European Perspective”, Journal of End User Computing, Jan-Mar 2001, pp. 12–25.
Castells, M. “Globalisation and Identity in the Network Society: a Rejoinder to Calhoun, Lyon and Touraine”, Prometheus, (4), 2000, pp. 109–123.
Chambers, R. Rural Development: Putting the Last First, London: Longman, 1983.
Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M., and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community Participation and Geographical Information Systems, London: Taylor and Francis, 2002.
Dasgupta, A.R., Rao, M., and Gopalan, A.K.S. “The National (Natural) Resource
Management Information System“, IAPRS (XXXIII),Amsterdam, 2000, pp. 27–34.
Ehn, P. “Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill”, in Participatory Design
Principles and Practice,D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.), NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993
pp. 41–77.
Escobar, A. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Friedmann, J. Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development, Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
Gadgil, M. “Biodiversity and India’s Degraded Lands”, Ambio, (22: 2–3), 1993, pp. 167–172. Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: An Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
Government of India. “Guidelines for Watershed Development (Revised)”, Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi, 2001.
Hutchinson, C.F. and Toledano, J. “Guidelines for Demonstrating Geographical Information Systems based on Participatory Development”, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, (7:5), 1993, pp. 453–461.
Jain, R.B., and Dwivedi, O.P. “Administrative Culture and Bureaucratic Values in India”, Indian Journal of Public Administration, (36:3), 1990, pp. 435–450.
Kothari, U. “Feminist and Postcolonial Challenges to Development”, in Development Theory and Practice, U. Kothari and M. Minogue (eds.), Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002, pp. 35–51.
Kothari, U., Minogue, M., and DeJong, J. “The Political Economy of Globalization”, in Development Theory and Practice, U. Kothari and M. Minogue (eds.), Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002, pp. 16–34.
Kumar, A., and Kaul, R. N. “Joint Forest Management in India: Points to Ponder”, Commonwealth Forestry Review, (75: 3 ), 1996, pp. 212–216.
McGee, R. “Participating in Development”, in Development Theory and Practice, U. Kothari and M. Minogue (eds.), Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002, pp. 92–116.
Mosse, D. “Authority, Gender, and Knowledge: Theoretical Reflections on the Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal”, Development and Change, (25), 1994, pp. 497–526.
Mumford, E. “The Participation of Users in System Design: An Account of the Origin, Evolution and Use of the ETHICS Method”, in Participatory Design: Principles and Practice, D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.), NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, pp. 257–270.
Patel, J. Story of a Rivulet Aravari: From Death to Rebirth, Alwar, India: Tarun Bharat Sangh, August 1997.
Saha, A. “Basic Human Nature in Indian Tradition and its Economic Consequences,” International Journal of Sociology Social Policy, (12: 1–2 ), 1992, pp. 1–50.
Sahay, S. “Implementing GIS Technology in India: Some Issues of Time and Space,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, (8: 2–3 ), 1998, pp. 147–188.
Sahay, S. and Walsham, G. “Social Structure and Managerial Agency in India”, Organization Studies, (18:3), 1997, pp. 415–444.
Schneider, H. and Libercier, M. “Concepts, Issues and Experiences for Building Up Participation,” in Participatory Development: From Advocacy to Action, H. Schneider and M. Libercier (eds.), Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1995, pp. 29–64.
Singh, V. Rejuvenating the Ruparel River, Alwar, India: Tarun Bharat Sangh, undated, probably 1998.
Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. “Preface”, in Participatory Design: Principles and Practice,D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.), NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, pp. xi-xiii.
Walsham, G. Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context, John Wiley, 2000. Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. “GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities”, MIS Quarterly, (23:1), 1999, pp. 39–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puri, S.K., Sahay, S. (2003). Institutional Structures and Participation. In: Korpela, M., Montealegre, R., Poulymenakou, A. (eds) Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 126. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35695-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35695-2_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6109-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35695-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive