Abstract
It is not always easy to speak about ethics in the context of the global information society, at least in some influent circles. People prefer the term ‘governance’, especially if it is associated with self-regulation. This paper summarises the findings of the analysis of some 40 self-regulation documents, using a standardised grid of analysis, carried out by IFIP-SIG9.2.2 (International Federation for Information Processing, Special Interest Group on Ethics of Computing). These documents include general texts about computing and information systems, both for the public and for professionals. There are also more specialised texts dealing with the Internet, and with specific domains. Among the latter, there are still generic documents, but also approaches by specific sectors. A list of the documents analysed is given in the Annex.
When looking at the different actors, it is clear that the presence of the authorities and of the users is rather weak: it often appears that it is the authors of the text who are being protected, rather than anyone else. As far as the content is concerned, most often it does not go further than providing a reminder of what is illegal, and the enumeration of relatively superficial principles of protection. Commitments are ‘reasonable’ and self-controlled. It seems that a strong lobby of firms engaged in e-commerce is often behind the activity.
Is it satisfactory to advocate self-regulation — the so-called ‘more contractual approach between the different parties’ — and regret without any further analysis the decline of the State, if the issue at stake is to regulate our society, the information society, what belongs to the common good? This paper raises questions about the legitimacy of the actors of self-regulation, the limits of the principle of subsidiarity, the conformity of content to higher principles, the capacity of enforcement, the transparency of decision, its efficiency. It seeks to identify the role of self-regulation in the ethical governance of the information society.
The authors belong to the ‘Cellule Interfacultaire de Technology Assessment’ (CITA) sponsored by the Belgian Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs, in the framework of its programme “Interuniversity Attraction Poles”, Phase 4, Convention n° 31. They are also indebted to IFIP-SIG9.2.2 where the work started some years ago. We just mention here those who spent time specifically with us in the analysis of the different documents: Penny Duquenoy, Marie d’UdekemGevers, Matt Jones and Diane Whitehouse. Many thanks also to Chris Zielinski who made the final English editing.
The updated original online version for this book can be found at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35609-9_29
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Herbert Maisl, Legal Problems Connected with the Ethics of Data Processing, Study for the Council of Europe (CJ-PD[79]8), Strasbourg, August 29, 1979. Same author, Drawing up of an Analysis Framework for Rules of Various Kinds in the Field of Data Processing Management, Council of Europe (CJ-PD[82] 19), Strasbourg, September 17, 1982. The meeting of 27–30 September 1982 concluded not to deepen the subject further: see Secretariat Memorandum (CJ-PD[8118), and the last report of Herbert Maisl, `Drawing up an analysis framework for rules of various kinds in the field of data processing management’ (CJ-PD[82]19), as well as the Minutes of the meeting (CJPD[82]31). In the meeting of 4–7 October 1983, the subject `deontology of informatics’ was not anymore on the agenda (CJ-PD[83]25).
Ethics of Computing: Codes, Spaces for Discussion and Law,Jacques Berleur and Klaus Brunnstein, Eds., A Handbook prepared by the IFIP Ethics Task Group, London: Chapman and Hall, 1996, 336 p., ISBN 0–412–72620–3 (now available at Kluwer Academic Publishers).
See for instance: The Center for Ethics and the Professions, Harvard University: http://www.ethics.harvard.edu/ The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, CA, http://www.scu.edu/SCU/Centers/Ethics/ DePaul University Institute for Business and Professional Ethics, http://www.depaul.edu/ethics/ the Centre for Business and Professional Ethics in the University of Leeds, http://www. philosophy.leeds.ac.uk/Links/body cbpe.htm
See for instance: Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, http://www.onlineethics.org
See for instance: the Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility of the De Montfort University in Leicester (UK) (http://www.ccsr.cse.dmu.ac.uk/index.html) the site InfoEthics of UNESCO (http://www.unesco.org/webworld/infoethics/infoethics.htm) the Australian Institute of Computer Ethics (http://www.aice.net) the International Center For Information Ethics du Prof. Rafael Capurro (http://icie.zkm.de/),Chrw(133)
Global Business Dialogue, http://www.gbde.org
World summit of regulators, Paris 1999, http://www.unesco.org/webworld/news/csa summit.shtml
Paper presented at the New York New Media Association, 10 June 1998. See also the important book of Lawrence Lessig, Code and other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York 1999
Jacques Berleur, Penny Duquenoy and Diane Whitehouse, Eds., Ethics and the Governance of the Internet,IFIP–SIG9.2.2, September 1999, IFIP Press, Laxenburg – Austria, ISBN 3–901882–03–0, 56 p. This monograph may be downloaded from the SIG9.2.2 website, by clicking on ‘Ethics and Internet Governance’: http://www.info.fundp.ac.be/~jbl/IFIP/cadresIFIP.html
The Net: User Guidelines and Netiquette, by Arlene H. Rinaldi http://www.fau.edu/netiquette/net/
EuroISPA Codes of Conduct http://www.euroispa.org/25.asp?page id=25
La Charte de l’Internet, http://www.planete.neticode-internet/ (Today available through http://www.archive.org) An English translation of this Charter has been prepared by Dr. Victoria Steinberg, Foreign Languages Department, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga. Email: Victoria-Steinberg@utc.edu
QuickLinks - Self-regulation/codes of conduct, http://www.q1inks.net/quicklinks/selfreg.htm
Proceedings of the OECD/BIAC Forum on Internet Content Self-Regulation, Paris, March 1998, DSTUICCP (98)18 Final, pp.21–31. Downloadable from http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/it/secur/act/self-reg.htm
Jacques Berleur, Penny Duquenoy and Diane Whitehouse, Eds., Ethics and the Governance of the Internet,doc. cit.
The full analysis is given in: Jacques Berleur and Marie d’Udekem-Gevers, Codes of Ethics within IFIP and Other Computer Societies, in: Ethics of Computing: Codes, Spaces for Discussion and Law, Jacques Berleur and Klaus Brunnstein, Eds., op. cit. A summary may be found in: Jacques Berleur, IFIP Framework for Ethics, in: Science and Engineering Ethics, A Special Issue on “Global Information Ethics”, Opragen Publications, Guildford, Surrey, UK, Volume 2, Issue 2, 1996, pp. 155–165.
http://www.info.fundp.ac.beHbl/IFIP/sig922/selfreg.html
Jacques Berleur and Marie d’Udekem-Gevers, Codes of Ethics within IFIP and Other Computer Societies, art. cit.
Memorandum on Self-regulation of Internet Content’ — ‘Self-regulation as a Foundation’, in: Jens Waltermann and Marcel Machill, Eds., Protecting our Children on the Internet, Towards a New Culture of Responsibility, Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers, Gütersloh, 2000, pp. 35–36.
Excite specifies that what is applicable is the law of the State of California, Yahoo, the law of the County of Santa Clara, for example!
Our first analysis has been presented in: Jacques Berleur and Jean-Marc Dinant, ‘Will Self-Regulation Improve the Internet Security?’, in: IFIP/SEC2000: Information Security. Information Security for Global Information Infrastructures, Sihan Qing and Jan H.P. Eloff, Eds., Proceedings of the IFIP-16th World Computer Congress, SEC2000, International Academic Publishers, Beijing 2000, pp. 306–309.
It seems that 52 millions of American adults take medical consultation on-line. See: The US Government Electronic Commerce Working Group, Leadership for the New Millennium, Delivering on Digital Progress and Prosperity,Third annual report, 16 January 2001, p. 20, http://www.ecommerce.gov/ or http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/industry/otea/ecommerce/
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Globalisation and the Information Society - The Need for Strengthened International Coordination, (this page seems not to be anymore available on the European site http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/eif/policy/com9850en.pdf; but see the GBDe site at http://www.gbde.org/origins. html
Legal Advisory Board, Legal Issues of the Information Society, http://europa.eu.intlISPO/legal/en/lab/labdef.html
The GBDe, the ICC and the BIAC to the OECD sign agreements on eCommerce issues, http://www.gbde.org/releases/121300a.html
Statement of Principles on Cyber Ethics, http://www.gbde.org/ethics/
Memorandum on Self-regulation of Internet Content’, doc. cit.
We have made explicit elsewhere this crucial question of the relationship between democracy and self-regulation: Jacques Berleur, Self-Regulation and Democracy: Choice and Limits?, in: User Identification and Privacy Protection, Applications in Public Administration and Electronic Commerce,Simone Fischer-Hübner, Gerald Quirchmayr
See for instance, Yves Poullet, Quelques considérations sur le droit du cyberespace, (Octobre 2000) http://www.kvab.be/werking/cawet/cawet inf/fibt.htm or http://www.droit.fundp.ac.be/textes/droit-du-cyberspace.PDF
Pierre Trudel, France Abran, Karim Benyekhlef et Hein Sophie, Droit du Cyberespace, Thémis 1997.
Pierre Trudel, ‘Les effets juridiques de l’ autoréglementation’, Revue de droit de l’université de Sherbrooke 1989, vol. 19, n° 2, p. 251
Jacques Berleru, Self–Regulation and and Louise Yngström, Eds., Stockholm 1999, DSV – Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology, Report Series 99–007, ISBN 91–7153–909–3, pp. 1–19.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, Brussels, Official Journal of the European Communities,23.11.95, No L/281/31–50.
Associated Press Release presented the creation of GBDe under the title `Global companies form group to curb government regulation of Internet’ (January 14, 1999) http://www.gbde.org/rcleases2.html
The statement is known most of the time in its negative form: ‘Do not do to the other what you would not like to be done to yourself.’ But there are variants: `Treat the others as you want to be treated,’ ’Treat others only in ways you are willing to be treated in the same situation.’ (Harry J. Gensler, Formal Ethics and the Golden Rule,Loyola University Chicago, Fall 1994, ad instar manuscr,pp. 101–125.)
Philippe Quéau, UNESCO, World Summit of regulators, “Internet and the New Services”, Paris, 30 November — 1e` December, 1999, http://www.unesco.org/webworld/news/991201 queau csa.shtml
See, Banks parade new products and strategies to keep afloat“ (The Guardian July 5, 1998)
On a normal day, it is not uncommon for bank branches to handle and process cash of up to 40 million Naira.
See “Technology comes into banking hall” (The Guardian, March 5, 1997 )
Government recently introduced higher denominations of 100, 200 and 500 Naira, which banks hope would ease some of the problems associated with the use of ATMs.
The Rural Banking Scheme (RBS), introduced by government in 1977, compelled all banks to increase their presence in rural areas by allocating to each of them a minimum number of branches they must establish, within a specified length of time, in rural areas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berleur, J., de Wespin, T.E. (2002). Self-regulation: Content, Legitimacy and Efficiency — Governance and Ethics. In: Brunnstein, K., Berleur, J. (eds) Human Choice and Computers. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 98. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35609-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35609-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5429-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35609-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive