Abstract
This paper tells the story of the definition and implementation of a corporate information infrastructure standard within Norsk Hydro. Standards are widely considered as the most basic features of information infrastructures—public as well as corporate. This view is expressed by a high level IT manager: The infrastructure shall be 100% standardized.” Such standards are considered universal in the sense that there is just one standard for each area or function, and that separate standards should fit together: no redundancy and no inconsistency. Each standard is shared by every actor within its use domain, and it is equal to everybody. Our story illustrates that reality is different. The idea of the universal standard is an illusion just like the treasure at the end of the rainbow. Each time a standard, which is believed to be complete and coherent, is defined, the discovery during implementation is that there are elements lacking or incompletely specified while others have to be changed to make the standard work. This makes various implementations different and incompatible—just like arbitrary non-standard solutions. This fact is due to essential aspects of standardization and infrastructure building. The universal aspects disappear during implementation, just as the rainbow moves away from us as we try to catch it.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35566-5_20
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, B. W. “Self-reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics,” in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow and D. Pines (eds.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1987, pp. 9–31.
Berg, M., and Timmermans, S. “Orders and Their Disorders: On the Construction of Universali-ties in Medical Work.,” forthcoming.
Bowker, G., and Star, S. L. “Knowledge and Infrastructure in International Information Management: Problems of Classification and Coding,” in Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, L. Bud-Frierman (ed.). London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 187–213.
Callon, M. “Techno—economic Networks and Irreversibility,” inA Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, J. Law (ed.). London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 132–161.
Callon, M., and Latour, B. “Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So,” in Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies, K. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel (eds.). London: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 259–276.
Ciborra, C. U. “Introduction: What Does Groupware Mean for the Organizations Hosting It?” In Groupware and Teamwork, C. Ciborra (ed.). New York: John Wiley Sons, 1996, pp. 1–19.
Hanseth, O. “Understanding Information Infrastructure Development: Installed Base Cultivation,” forthcoming.
Hanseth, O., and Braa, K. “Technology as Traitor: SAP Infrastructures in Global Organizations,” in Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual International Conference on Information Systems, R. Hirschheim, M. Newman, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Helsinki, Finland, December 13–16, 1998, pp. 188–196.
Hanseth, O., and Monteiro, E. “Information Infrastructure Development: Design Through Diffusion,” in First IFIP 8.6 Working Conference on Diffusion and Adaptation of Technology, K. Kautz, J. Pries-Heje, T. J. Larsen, and P. S¢rgaard (eds.), Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway, 1995, pp. 279–292.
ISO/IEC International Standard 10746–2 (ITU-T Rec. X.902): Basic Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing—Part 2: Foundations. 1995 (http://www.iso.ch:8000/RM-ODP/ part2/toc.html).
Joerges, B. “Large Technical Systems: Concepts and Issues,” in The Development of Large Technical Systems, R. Mayntz and T. P. Hughes (eds.) Frankfurt-am-Main: Campus Verlag, 1988, pp. 9–36.
Kahin, B., and Abbate, J. (eds). Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
Keen, P. Shaping the Future: Business Redesign through Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1981.
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage, 1986.
Open EDI. Information Technology: Open EDI Reference Model. Draft International Standard. ISO/IEC 14662(http://www.harbinger.com/resource/klaus/open-edi/model/oerm.html),1997.
Star, S. L., and Ruhleder, K. “Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces,” Information Systems Research (7:1), 1996, pp. 111–134.
Steinmueller, W. E. “Technology Infrastructure in Information Technology Industries,” in Technological Infrastructure Policy: An International Perspective, M. Teubal, D. Foray, M. Justman and E. Zuscovitch (eds.). Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1995.
Timmermans, S., and Berg, M. “Standardization in Action: Achieving Universalism and Localization in Medical Protocols,” Social Studies of Science (27), 1997, pp. 273–305.
Weill, P., and Broadbent, M. Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanseth, O., Braa, K. (1999). Hunting for the Treasure at the End of the Rainbow: Standardizing Corporate IT Infrastructure. In: Ngwenyama, O., Introna, L.D., Myers, M.D., DeGross, J.I. (eds) New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35566-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35566-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5994-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35566-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive