Abstract
UK government policies are heralding the use of ICT’s in education with the hope that on-line learning will bring skill development attractive to industry and improved employment opportunities for today’s learners. One feature of this is increasing the use of technology in teaching and learning across the curriculum. In this atmosphere of euphoria and expectation, is this opportunity for all or just a few? There has been little empirical work on the gender impact of using technology in education. This paper takes a case study approach and critically evaluates an on-line course developed for IT undergraduate students at the University of Salford, as part of a major flexible learning initiative. Our research raises many questions. Why should women students be motivated to learn using technology? Previous studies have suggested that boys show a marked improvement when using educational technology to support their learning. For girls the results are much less clear. In this context we questioned the gender impact of an increased use of technology in the teaching and learning process. We investigated the gender divide in attitudes, and effects on learning outcomes, within the initiative. We also discuss our evaluation methodology that included gender impact elements and suggest ways in which to create a woman-friendly on-line learning environment.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bain, A., Hess, P.T., Jones, G., Berelowitz, C. (1999). Gender differences and computer competency: The effects of a high access computer program on the computer competence of young women. http://www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n1/bain/index.html
Broadhurst, J. (1997). Gender differences in Online Communication in Ermann, M.D., Williams, M.B., Shauf, M.S. Computers, Ethics and society, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press.
Clarke, A. (1999). University for industry IT sector modeling. NIACE - DfEE.
educ@guardian. (1998). Tuesday October 13th 1998.
Evaluation cookbook (1999). (various authors), Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative. Heriot-Watt university. http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi.
Evans, T. (1994). Understanding Learners In Open And Distance Education. London: Kogan Page.
French, S. (1998). Implementing flexible learning. Unpublished paper: IT Institute. University of Salford.
Greasley, K. (1998). Does gender affect students’ approaches to learning? In. S. Brown, S. Armstrong and G. Thompson. (Eds), Motivating students. Edgbaston, Kogan Page - SEDA.
Griffiths, D. (1985). The exclusion of women from technology, in Smothered by invention. W. Faulkner and E. Arnold. (Eds.) Pp. 51–71. London: Pluto Press.
Joiner, R., Messer, D., Littleton, K., Light, P. (1996). Gender, computer experience and computer-based problem solving. Computer Education 26 (1–3), 179–187.
Kirkup, G. and J. Abbott (1997). The gender gap. A gender analysis of the 1996 computing access survey. Milton Keynes, PLUM Paper number 80. ( Programme on Learner Use of Media, Open University ).
Magee, R., Baldwin, A., Newstead, S., Fullerton, H. (1998). Age, gender and course differences in approaches to studying in first-year undergraduate students, in Motivating Students. S. Brown, S. Armstrong and G. Thompson. (Eds.). Edgbaston: Kogan Page - SEDA.
Maynard, E. M. and S. J. Pearsall (1994). What about male mature students? A comparison of the experiences of men and women students. Journal of Access Studies 9, 229–240.
NCET (1996). Gender and IT. Coventry.
Oliver, M. and G. Conole (1998). Evaluating communication and information technologies: a toolkit for practitioners. Active Learning 8.
Panteli, N. (1998). Review of ‘Women computer professional: progress and resistance’ by Rosemary Wright. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 7, 71–77.
Roberts, P. (1997). Androgynous Women and Computing: A Perfect match? (pp. 102–112 ) In R. Lander and A. Adam (Eds.). Women in Computing. Exeter: Intellect Books.
Selby, L., Young, A., Fisher, D. (1997). Increasing the participation of women in tertiary level computing courses: what works and why. ASCILITE’97.
Siann, G. (1997). We can, we don’t want to: Factors influencing women’s participation in computing. In R. Lander and A. Adam (Eds.). Women in Computing. Exeter: Intellect Books.
von Prummer, C. (1994). Women-friendly perspectives in distance education. Open Learning 9 (1).
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wilson, F. (1997). Computing, computer science and computer scientists: how they are perceived. In R. Lander and A. Adam (Eds.). Women in Computing. Exeter: Intellect Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richardson, H.J., French, S. (2000). Education On-Line: What’s In It For Women?. In: Balka, E., Smith, R. (eds) Women, Work and Computerization. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35509-2_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35509-2_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6977-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35509-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive