Abstract
Many researchers have searched for evidence of organizational improvements from the huge sums invested in ICT. Unfortunately, evidence for such a pay back is spotty at best (e.g., Brynjolfsson 1994; Brynjolfsson and Hitt 1998; Meyer and Gupta 1994). On the other hand, at the individual level, computing and communication technologies are increasingly merging into work in ways that make it impossible to separate the two (e.g., Bridges 1995; Gasser 1986; Zuboff 198). This problem—usually referred to as the productivity paradox—is an example of a more pervasive issue: linking phenomena and theories from different levels of analysis.
Organizational processes provide a bridge between individual, organizational, and even industrial level impacts of information and communication technologies (ICT). Viewing a process as the way organizations accomplish desired goals and transform inputs into outputs makes the link to organizational outcomes. Viewing processes as ordered collections of activities makes the link to individual work, since individual actors perform these activities. As well, process theories can be a useful milieu for theoretical interplay between interpretive and positivist research paradigms. A process-centered research framework is illustrated with an analysis of the process of seating and serving customers in two restaurants. The analysis illustrates how changes in individual work affect the process and thus the organizational outcomes and how processes provide a theoretical bridge between work at different levels of analysis.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_33
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Abbott, A. “From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism,” Sociological Methods and Research (20: 4 ), 1992, pp. 428–455.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., and Mead, M. “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (11:3), 1987, pp. 369–386.
Boudreau, M.-C., and Robey, D. “Organizational Transition to Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Theoretical Choices for Process Research,” in Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems, P. De and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Charlotte, North Carolina, 1999.
Bridges, W. Job Shift. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
Brynjolfsson, E. “The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology,” Communications of the ACM (36: 12 ), 1994, pp. 67–77.
Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. “Beyond the Productivity Paradox,” Communications of the ACM (41:8), 1998, pp. 49–55.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann, 1979.
Cannella, A. A., Jr., and Paetzold, R. L. “Pfeffer’s Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder,” Academy of Management Review (19:2), 1994, pp. 331–341.
Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: Wiley, 1981.
Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1990.
Crowston, K. “Organizational Processes for Coordination. Symposium Presentation,” in Academy of Management Conference, Dallas, Texas, 1994.
Crowston, K. “A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design,” Organization Science (8: 2 ), 1994, pp. 157–175.
Crowston, K., and Osborn, C. S. A Coordination Theory Approach to Process Description and Redesign. Technical Report Number 204, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Coordination Science, 1998.
Crowston, K., Sawyer, S., and Wigand, R. “Investigating the Interplay Between Structure and Technology in the Real Estate Industry,” paper presented at the Organizational Communications and Information Systems Division, Academy of Management Conference, Syracuse University, School of Information Studies, 1999.
Crowston, K., and Treacy, M. E. “Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Enterprise Level Performance,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, L. Maggi, R. Zmud, and J. Wetherbe (eds.), Indianapolis, Indiana, 1986,pp. 299–310.
Crowston, K., and Wigand, R. “Real Estate War in Cyberspace: An Emerging Electronic Market?” International Journal of Electronic Markets (9:1–2), 1999, pp. 1–8.
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Gasser, L. “The Integration of Computing and Routine Work, ”ACMTOOIS (4: 3 ), 1986, pp. 205–225.
Kaplan, B. “Models of Change and Information Systems Research,” in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991, pp. 593–611.
Karp, D. “Programming Lunch from `Table’s Ready’ to `Here’s your Check’,” New York Times, August 24, 1994, p. B l.
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., and Hall, R. J. “Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection and Analysis,” Academy of Management Review (19), 1994, pp. 195–229.
Klein, K. J., Tosi, H., and Cannella Jr., A. A. “Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, Barriers and New Developments,” Academy of Management Review (24:2), 1999, pp. 243–249.
Lee, A. “Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research,” Organization Science (2: 4 ), 1991, pp. 342–365.
Malone, T. W., and Crowston, K. “The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination,” Computing Surveys (26:1), 1994, pp. 87–119.
Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, J., Osborne, C., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., Klein, M., and O’Donnell, E. “Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes,” Management Science (43:3), 1999, pp. 425–443.
March, J. G., and Sutton, R. I. “Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable,” Organization Science (8: 6 ), 1997, pp. 698–706.
Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. “Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research,” Management Science (34:5), 1988, pp. 583–598.
Meyer, M., and Gupta, V. “The Performance Paradox,” Research in Organizational Behavior (16), 1994, pp. 309–369.
Mohr, L. B. Explaining Organizational Behavior: The Limits and Possibilities of Theory and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
Orlikowski, W. “Case Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development,” MIS Quarterly (20: 3 ), 1993, pp. 309–340.
Price, J. L., and Mueller, C. W. Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1986.
Rock Systems. Prohost Promotional Material, 1994.
Sakamoto, S. “Process Design Concept: A New Approach to IE, ” Industrial Engineering, March 1989, p. 31.
Sawyer, S., Crowston, K., and Wigand, R. “ICT in the Real Estate Industry: Agents and Social Capital,” in Advances in Social Informatics and Information Systems Track, Americas Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1999.
Schultz, M., and Hatch, M. J. “Living with Multiple Paradigms: The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies,” Academy of Management Review (21: 2 ), 1996, pp. 529–557.
Simon, H. A. “On the Concept of Organizational Goal,” Administrative Sciences Quarterly (9:1), 1964, pp. 1–22.
Simon, H. A. “Organizations and Markets,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives (5:2), 1991, pp. 25–44.
Thompson, J. D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Victor, B., and Blackburn, R. S. “Interdependence: An Alternative Conceptualization,” Academy of Management Review (12:3), 1987, pp. 486–498.
Walsh, J. P. “Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane,” Organization Science (6: 3 ), 1995, pp. 280–321.
Weick, K., and Roberts, K. “Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, pp. 357–381.
Yin, R. K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crowston, K. (2000). Process as Theory in Information Systems Research. In: Baskerville, R., Stage, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6107-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35505-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive