Advertisement

Some Current Issues In Using Diffuse Large Datasets For Environmental Modelling In New Zealand

  • Graham McBride
  • Ude Shankar
  • Rich Alexander
  • Sandy Elliott
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 39)

Abstract

Issues arising from the application of the SPARROW regional regression modelling technique to fluxes on nutrients in New Zealand streams are discussed. These include model scale dependency, as reflected in changing the DEM scale, and the lack of compatibility and transportability of the associated software. Nevertheless, this spatial referencing technique is demonstrating considerable advantages, because it manies the considerable spatially-referenced datasets with measurements routinely made in waterbodies. This facilitates the explanation of the relative importance of contaminant sources and may even be useful as a predictive tool (e.g., in showing the consequences of changing the land-use).

Key words

Spatially-referenced water quality nutrients regression scale GIS 

References

  1. Cohn, T.A.; DeLong, L.L.; Gilroy, E.J.; Hirsch, R.M.; Wells, D.K. 1989: Estimating constituent loads. Water Resources Research 25: 937–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferguson, R.I. 1986: River loads underestimated by rating curves. Water Resources Research 22: 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hutchinson, M.F. 1989: A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology 106: 21 1–232.Google Scholar
  4. Preston, S.D.; Brakebill, J.W. 1999: Application of spatially referenced regression modeling for the evaluation of total nitrogen loading in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4054, 12 p.Google Scholar
  5. SAS. 1993: SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 6, 2nd Edition. SAS Inst. Cary, NC, USA: 509–591.Google Scholar
  6. Smith, R.A.; Schwarz, G.E.; Alexander, R.B. 1997: Regional interpretation of water-quality monitoring data. Water Resources Research 33: 2781–2798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. White, D.A.; Smith, R.A.; Price, C.V.; Alexander, R.B.; Robinson, K.W. 1992: A spatial model to aggregate point-source and nonpoint-source water-quality data for large areas, Computational Geosciences 18: 1055–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham McBride
    • 1
  • Ude Shankar
    • 2
  • Rich Alexander
    • 3
  • Sandy Elliott
    • 1
  1. 1.NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.)HamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.)ChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.NZ USGS (United States Geological Survey)RestonUSA

Personalised recommendations