Abstract
Current assembly modelling and tolerance analysis functionality offered by most CAD vendors extends to the evaluation of a design in terms of its form and fit. There is no evidence of these tolerance optimisation tools offering the designer an ‘in-context’ perspective of process capability: an assessment of whether the required tolerances are achievable from the available manufacturing process. There is also a lack of provision for the direct use of experimental design data, within the CAD system environment. The aim of this research is to enable these prototype and production test results to be used in conjunction with a manufacturing capability model to establish the best compromise between product performance and process capability. This research program is to establish a framework with which process capability data can be captured, interpreted and subsequently used in a CAD system, making it readily available for the designer to use in the pursuit of a more robust product. The framework will be demonstrable in the context of vacuum pump design and manufacture in BOCE (BOC Edwards), the company hosting the research activity.
The framework will have the potential to reduce the level of first time test failures that are attributed to products containing parts that are not made to specification. It will also eliminate the time and resource overhead incurred in redesigning parts, which cannot be manufactured due to the specification of unachievable tolerances. As a result, machining scrap will also be reduced. In addition, the designer will be more confident that a ‘robust’ product has been produced, with reduced sensitivity to normal variations in the manufacturing process. Where a ‘close’ tolerance is absolutely vital, and the current manufacturing process is not capable, the framework will highlight this early in the design phase and allow the purchase of additional (and possibly long lead time) tooling or fixturing, thereby providing effective support to the new product introduction process.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35492-7_50
Chapter PDF
References
Creveling, C.M. (1997), ‘Tolerance Design — A Handbook for Developing Optimal Specifications’, published by Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Berezowitz, William A., Chang, Tsong-How (1995), ‘Capability Indices — Somewhere the Point Got Lost’, Technical Paper MS95–148, published by Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan, United States.
Eadie, R.G., Gao, J.X. (1999), ‘An Industrial Implementation of Manufacturing System Integration Through Optimisation of CAD Data’, Proceedings of the 156 International Conference on Computer-Aided Production Engineering, published by the University of Durham, England.
Caron, Rob, Larsen, Paul (1999), ‘Data Interoperability using Enterprise-Wide Data Sources’, published on the Internet by Microsoft Corporation http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/backgmd/html/dataint.htm.
Vaughn, William R. (1998), ‘Hitchhiker’s Guide to Visual Basic and SQL Server’, published by Microsoft Press, United States.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eadie, R., Gao, J. (2002). A Framework for a CAD-Integrated Tolerance Optimisation System. In: Kovács, G.L., Bertók, P., Haidegger, G. (eds) Digital Enterprise Challenges. PROLAMAT 2001. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 77. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35492-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35492-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4987-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35492-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive