Abstract
This paper argues that research on gender and information systems, from both quantitative and qualitative traditions, is problematic as the concept of gender continues to remain under-theorized. We discuss why this may have occurred given that an interest in gender has begun to permeate other disciplines. We elaborate an extensive critique of research which utilizes a statistical approach, discussing four recent papers with one MIS Quarterly paper taken as the cardinal example. We also include a shorter discussion of qualitative literature on gender and IS which reflects the paucity of published literature in this area. Here we see similar tendencies at work, where both gender and technology are taken to be fixed, “essential,” and even stereotypical categories and where authors have yet to grasp the nettle of solidly theorizing the concept of gender against the extensive gender and information technology literature which now exists.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35489-7_33
Chapter PDF
References
Adam, A., Emms, J., Green, E., and Owen, J. (eds.). Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries—Building New Forms, Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland, 1994.
Bacon, J., and Fitzgerald, B. “The Field of IST: A Name, a Framework, and a Central Focus,” Executive Systems Research Centre Working Paper Series, University College Cork, 1996.
Balka, E., and Smith, R. (eds.). Women, Work and Computerization: Charting a Course to the Future, Boston: Kluwer, 2000.
Bloomfield, B. P., Coombs, R., Knights, D., and Littler, D. Information Technology and Organi- zations: Strategies, Networks, and Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
Cameron, D. (ed.). The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader (2nd Edition), London: Routledge, 1998.
Checkland, P., and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and Information Systems, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
Cockburn, C. Machinery ofDominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-How, London: Pluto Press, 1985.
Cockbum, C., and Ormrod, S. Gender and Technology in the Making, London: Sage, 1993. Culnan, M., and Swanson, E. B. “Research in Management Information Systems 1980–1984: Points of Work and Reference,” MIS Quarterly (10:3), 1986, pp. 289–301.
Davis, F. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319–339.
Douglas, M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.
Evans, M. (ed.). The Woman Question, London: Sage, 1994.
Faludi, S. Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women, London: Vintage, 1992.
Gefen, D., and Straub, D. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Quarterly (21:4), 1997, pp. 389–400.
Grint, K., and Woolgar, S. “On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology,” in The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research, K. Grint, and R. Gill (eds.), London: Taylor and Francis, 1995, pp. 48–75.
Grundy, F. Women and Computers, Exeter, England: Intellect, 1996.
Grundy, F., Kohler, D., Oechtering, V., and Petersen, U. (eds.). Women, Work and Computeri-zation: Spinning a Web from Past to Future, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Hardgrave, W., and Walstrom, K. “Forums for MIS Scholars,” Communications of the ACM (40:11), 1997, pp. 119–124.
Harvey, L. “A Genealogical Exploration ofGendered Genres in IT Cultures,”Information Systems Journal (7), 1997, pp. 153–172.
Igbaria, M., and Chidambaram, M. “The Impact of Gender on Career Success of Information Systems Professionals,” Information Technology and People (10:1), 1997, pp. 63–86.
Jones, M. “It All Depends What You Mean by Disciplinechrww(133),” in Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline, J. Mingers and F. Stowell (eds.), London: McGraw-Hill, 1997, pp. 97–112.
Jones, M. “The Moving Finger: The Use of Social Theory in WG 8.2 Conference Papers, 1975–1999,” in Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology,R. Baskerville
J. Stage, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 15–31. Kirby, V. “Corporeal Habits: Addressing Essentialism Differently,” Hypatia (6), 1991, pp. 4–24.
Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (23: I), 1999, pp. 67–94.
Lee, A. “Editor’s Comments: Strategizing for Compelling and Significant Research,” MIS Quarterly (23: 2 ), 1999.
Lee, A. S., Liebenau, J., and DeGross, J. I. Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman 000 Hall, 1997.
Lovegrove, G., and Segal, B. Women into Computing: Selected Papers 1988–1990, London: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
Lyytinen, K. “Different Perspectives on Information Systems: Problems and Solutions,” ACM Computing Surveys (19), 1987, pp. 5–46.
MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press, 1985.
Nightingale, W., Halkett, A., and Hammond, K. “Involve: Inclusive Teaching in First Year Computer Science Courses,” in Women in Computing, R. Lander and A. Adam (eds.), Exeter, England: Intellect, 1997, pp. 154–159.
Panteli, A., Stack, J., Atkinson, M., and Ramsay, H. “The Status of Women in the UK IT Industry: An Empirical Study,” European Journal of Information Systems (8), 1999, pp. 170–182.
Robertson, M., Bjerknes, G., Mathiassen, L., Newell, S., and Swan, J. “is Gender an Issue in Information Systems? A Comparative Analysis of UK and Scandinavian Data and Experience,” in Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Information Systems, J. Pries-Heje, C. Ciborra, K. Kautz, J. Valor, E. Christiannse, D. Avison, and C. Heje (eds.), Copenhagen, 1999, pp 1032–1037.
Ruddick, S. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace, Boston: Beacon, 1989.
Star, S. L. “Invisible Work and Silenced Dialogues in Knowledge Representation,” in Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education, K. Tijdens, B. Kitchenham, and I. Eriksson (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991, pp. 8192.
Stowell, F., and Mingers, J. “Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline?” introduction to in Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline?, J. Mingers and F. Stowell (eds.), London: McGraw-Hill, 1997, pp. 1–15.
Suchman, L. “Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2), 1994a, pp. 177–190.
Suchman, L. “Supporting Articulation Work: Aspects of a Feminist Practice of Technology,” in Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries—Building New Forms, A. Adam, J. Emms, E. Green, and J. Owen (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland, 1994b, pp. 7–21.
Suchman, L. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2), 1994c, pp. 21–39.
Tijdens, K., Kitchenham, B., and Eriksson, I. (eds.). Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991.
Truman, G. E., and Baroudi, J. J. “Gender Differences in the Information Systems Managerial Ranks: An Assessment of Potential Discriminatory Practices,” MIS Quarterly (18:2), 1994, pp. 129–141.
Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly (24:1), 2000, pp. 115–139.
Wajcman, J. Feminism Confronts Technology,Cambridge, England: Polity Press, 1991. Wajcman, J. “Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies. In What State Is the Art?” Social Studies of Science (30:3), 200, pp. 447–464.
Webster, J. Shaping Women ‘s Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology, London: Longmans, 1996.
Wilson, M., Howcroft, D. “The Role of Gender in User Resistance and IS Failure,” in Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, R. Baskerville, J. Stage, and J. I. De Gross (eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 453–472.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adam, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H. (2001). Absent Friends? The Gender Dimension in Information Systems Research. In: Russo, N.L., Fitzgerald, B., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 66. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35489-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35489-7_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6366-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35489-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive