Abstract
As in any decision process, the starting point of technology portfolio planning and management is the assessment of the subjective values of the decision maker. These values are also often expressed in terms of goals and objectives for the technology portfolio decision as they represent what the decision maker would like to achieve with the portfolio.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
2.6. References
Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T., The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, RWS Publications, revised edition 2001.
Saaty, T., Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications, 1999/2000 revised edition.
Saaty, T., Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, extended edition 1990.
Software: Expert Choice, www.expertchoice.com
Utility Theory
Barbara, S., Hammond, P., and Seidl, C. (Ed.), Handbook of Utility Theory, Springer, 1999
Fishburn, P., The Foundations of Expected Utility, Springer, 1982
Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press. 1944 second edition. 1947
Software: DecisionPro, Vanguard Software Corporation, www.vanguarddsw.com
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2006). Quantify Values and Risk Attitudes. In: Technology Portfolio Planning and Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 96. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35448-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35448-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-35446-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35448-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)