Skip to main content

The Problem of the Expert’s Ethics in Court

  • Chapter
  • 1261 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackernecht, E. H. (1959). A short history of psychiatry. New York and London: Hafner Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Forensic Sciences (2002). Code of Ethics. Colorado Springs, CO, 80904.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Forensic Sciences Committee on Good Forensic Practice. (2000). Standards of good forensic practice. Academy News, 30(1), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. (2005). Ethics guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Bloomfield, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Medical News. (2000, May 1). Employer health exams; relevance of Hippocratic Oath, 43(17), 15, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (Trans. 1976). Ethics. London: Penguin Classics, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2001a). The principles of medical ethics with annotations especially applicable to psychiatry. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2001b). Opinions of the ethics committee on the principles of medical ethics with annotations especially applicable to psychiatry. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1984). Psychiatric ethics in the courtroom. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 12, 225–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1990). The parable of the forensic psychiatrist: Ethics and the problem of doing harm. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 13, 249–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1992). Forensic psychiatry: The need for self-regulation. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20, 153–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1997). A theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25, 233–247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloche, M. G. (1993). Psychiatry, capital punishment and the purpose of medicine. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 16, 301–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bordenn, W. A. (1999). A history of justice: Origins of law and psychiatry. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Newsletter, 24(2), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candilis, P. J., Martinez, R., & Dording, C. (2001). Principles and narrative in forensic psychiatry: Toward a robust view of professional role. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 167–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Candilis, P. J., & Martinez, R. (2006). Commentary: The higher standards of aspirational ethics. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34, 242–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Opinions of, Section 8.13, 2002, retrieved from www.ama-assn.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Opinions of, Section 9.07, June 2004, retrieved from www.ama-assn.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, J. R., & Clements, C. (2001). Commentary: Forensic psychiatry and ethics – The voyage continues. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 174–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15(6), 655–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, W. L., & Pollack, S. (1985). Mental health justice: Ethical issues of interdisciplinary cooperation. In W. J. Curran, A. L. McGarry & S. A. Shah (Eds.), Forensic psychiatry and psychology: Perspectives and standards for interdisciplinary practice (pp. 61–73). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, B. L. (1956). The simulation of sanity. Journal of Social Therapy, 2, 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, B. L. (1959). The fallacy of the impartial expert. Archives of Criminal Psychodynamics, 3, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, B. L. (1961). Criminal responsibility of the mentally ill. Stanford Law Review, 14, 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, B. L. (1990). The psychiatrist expert witness: Honest advocate or “hired gun”? In R. Rosner & R. Weinstock (Eds.), Ethical practice in psychiatry and the law (pp. 75–84). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, B. L. (1992). The forensic psychiatrist: Consultant vs. activist in legal doctrine. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20, 119–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, A. R. (1988). Ethics and psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, L. (1956). The professional ethics of the Greek physician, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 30(5), 391–419.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (1990). Ethics and the death penalty: Participation by forensic psychiatrists in capital trials. In R. Rosner & R. Weinstock (Eds.), Ethical practice in psychiatry and the law (pp. 207–217). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, S. R. (1961). Expert medical testimony and the medical expert. In O. Schroeder Jr. (Ed.), Medical facts for legal truth (pp. 195–212). Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, E. E. H. (1998). Ethics in forensic psychiatry: A response to Stone and Appelbaum. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26, 171–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, E. E. H. (2005). Personal narrative and an African-American perspective on medical ethics. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 371–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hundert, E. M. (1990). Competing medical and legal ethical values: Balancing problems of the forensic psychiatrist. In R. Rosner & R. Weinstock (Eds.), Ethical practice in psychiatry and the law (pp. 53–72). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R. (1990). The medicine of the old ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1992). “The fallacy of the impartial expert” revisited. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20, 141–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, R., & Candilis, P. (2005). Commentary: Toward a unified theory of personal and professional ethics. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 382–385.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. S. (1984). Law and psychiatry: Rethinking the relationship. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers, Code of Ethics, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • National Organization of Forensic Social Work, Code of Ethics, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (1993). Societal duty and moral complicity: The physician’s dilemma of divided loyalty. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 16, 371–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, S. (1974). Forensic psychiatry in criminal law. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prioreschi, P. (1995). The hippocratic oath: A code for physicians, not a Pythagorean manifesto. Medical Hypotheses, 44(6), 447–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prosono, M. (1990). The professionalization of expertise in the case of forensic psychiatry: A study of emergence and quest for legitimacy (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco, 1990). Available from U.M.I. Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosono, M. (1994). History of forensic psychiatry. In R. Rosner (Ed.), Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry (pp. 13–29). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R. (1985). Legal regulation of psychiatry and forensic psychiatry: Clarifying categories for physicians. In R. Rosner (Ed.), Critical issues in American psychiatry and the law (Vol. 2, pp. 19–29). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R. (1990). Forensic psychiatry: A subspecialty. In R. Rosner & R. Weinstock (Eds.), Ethical practice in psychiatry and the law (pp. 19–29). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R. (1997). Foundations of ethical practice in the forensic sciences. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 1191–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R., & Weinstock, R. (Eds.). (1990). Ethical practice in psychiatry and the law. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, J. Z. (2005). Values and psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. P., Winnick, B., & Wexler, D. B. (2000). Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A. (1992). Paper presented as part of a panel on controversial ethical issues in forensic psychiatry, 23rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Boston, October 16, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A. (Ed.). (1984). The ethics of forensic psychiatry: A view from the ivory tower. In Law, psychiatry and morality (pp. 5–18). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog, R. D., & Brennan, T. A. (1993). Participation of physicians in capital punishment. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(18), 1346–1350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia. (2004). The Hippocratic Corpus. Retrieved from www.med.virginia.edu/hs-library/historical/antiqua/texto.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R. M. (1977). Case studies in medical ethics (Chap. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R. (1986). Ethical concerns expressed by forensic scientists. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 31, 596–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R. (1988). Controversial ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: A survey. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 33, 176–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R. (1989). Perceptions of ethical problems by forensic psychiatrists. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 17, 189–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R. (1997). Ethical practice in forensic sciences—An introduction. Journal of Forensic Science, 42, 1189–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R. (1998). Comment on a theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26, 151–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R. (2001). Commentary: A broadened conception of forensic psychiatric ethics. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 180–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R., Leong, G. B., & Silva, J. A. (1990). The role of traditional medical ethics in forensic psychiatry. In R. Rosner & R. Weinstock (Eds.), Ethical practice in psychiatry and the law (pp. 31–51). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R., Leong, G. B., & Silva, J. A. (1991). Opinions by AAPL forensic psychiatrists on controversial ethical guidelines. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19, 237–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, R., Leong, G. B., & Silva, J. A. (1996). California’s diminished capacity defense; evolution and transformation. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 24, 347–366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Candilis, P.J., Weinstock, R., Martinez, R. (2007). The Problem of the Expert’s Ethics in Court. In: Forensic Ethics and the Expert Witness. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35383-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics