Manipulation of Succession

  • Karel Prach
  • Rob Marrs
  • Petr Pyšsek
  • Rudy van Diggelen


Succession comprises many ecological processes that underpin all ecological restoration and ecological restoration is a manipulation of these processes to achieve its goals. This means it is essential to understand how succession operates, and when and how to manipulate it.


Alien Species Ecological Restoration Alien Plant Biological Conservation Dune Slack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, W. M. 2002. Restoration policy and infrastructure. Africa. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Vol. 2. Restoration in Practice. M. R. Perrow, and A. J. Davy (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1988. Heathland Restoration: A Handbook of Techniques. Southampton: British Gas.Google Scholar
  3. Antonsen, H., and Olsson, P. A. 2005. Relative importance of burning, mowing and species translocation in the restoration of a former boreal hayfield: responses of plant diversity and the microbial community. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:337–347.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, J. P. 1989. Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bakker, J. P., Esselink, P., van der Wal, R., and Dijkema, K. S. 1997. Options for restoration and management of coastal salt marshes in Europe. In: Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development. K. M. Urbanska, N. R. Webb, and P. J. Edwards (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 286–322.Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, J. P., Elzinga, J. A., and de Vries, Y. 2002. Effects of long-term cutting in a grassland system: Perspectives for restoration of plant communities on nutrient-poor soils. Applied Vegetation Science 5:107–120.Google Scholar
  7. Bakker, J. P., and Londo, G. 1998. Grazing for conservation management in historical perspective. In: Grazing and Conservation Management. M. F. Wallis De Vries, J. P. Bakker, and S. E. van Wieren (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 23–54.Google Scholar
  8. Bartha, S., Meiners, S. J., Pickett, S. T. A., and Cadenasso, M. L. 2003. Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession. Applied Vegetation Science 6:205–212.Google Scholar
  9. Bastl, M., Kočár, P., Prach, K., and Pyšek, P. 1997. The effect of successional age and disturbance on the establishment of alien plants in man-made sites: an experimental approach. In: Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. J. H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pyšek, and D. Green (eds.). Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, pp. 191–201.Google Scholar
  10. Bekker, R. M., Verweij, G. L., Smith, R. E. N., Reine, R., Bakker, J. P., and Schneider, S. 1997. Soil seed banks in European grasslands: Does land use affect regeneration perspectives? Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1293–1310.Google Scholar
  11. Beltman, B., van den Broek, T., and Bloemen, S. 1995. Restoration of acidified rich-fen ecosystems in the Vechtplassen area: Successes and failures. In: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Fojt, and R. A. Robertson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 273–286.Google Scholar
  12. Beltman, B., van den Broek, T., Bloemen, S., and Witsel, C. 1996a. Effects of restoration measures on nutrient availability in a formerly nutrient-poor floating fen after acidification and eutrophication. Biological Conservation 78:271–277.Google Scholar
  13. Beltman, B., van den Broek, T., van Maanen, K., and Vaneveld, K. 1996b. Measures to develop a rich-fen wetland landscape with a full range of successional states. Ecological Engineering 7:299–313.Google Scholar
  14. Benkewitz, S., Tischew, S., and Lebender, A. 2002. “Arche Noah” für Pflanzen? Zur Bedeutung von Altwaldresten für die Wiederbesiedlungsprozesse im Tagebaugebiet Goitsche. Hercynia N.F. 35:181–214.Google Scholar
  15. Bos, D., Bakker, J. P., de Vries, Y., and van Lieshout, S. 2002. Long-term vegetation changes in experimentally grazed and ungrazed back-barrier marshes in the Wadden Sea. Applied Vegetation Science 5:45–54.Google Scholar
  16. Bradshaw, A. D. 1983. The reconstruction of ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 20:1–17.Google Scholar
  17. Bradshaw, A. D. 2002. Using natural processes. In: The Restoration and Management of Derelict Land: Modern Approaches. M. H. Wong and A. D. Bradshaw (eds.). New Jersey, London, Singapore, Hong Kong: World Scientific, pp. 181–189.Google Scholar
  18. Christensen, N. L., and Peet, R. K. 1984. Convergence during secondary forest succession. Journal of Ecology 72:26–35.Google Scholar
  19. Chytrý, M., Pyšek, P., Tichý, L., Knollová, I., and Danihelka, J. 2005. Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: A quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77:339–354.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, B. D., and Montgomery, D. R. 2002. Forest development, wood jams, and restoration of floodplain rivers in the Puget Lowland, Washington. Restoration Ecology 10:237–247.Google Scholar
  21. Csecserits, A., and Rédei, T. 2001. Secondary succession on sandy old-fields in Hungary. Applied Vegetation Science 4:63–74.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P., and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: A general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528–534.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, M. A., Pergl, J., Truscott, A.-M., Kollman, J., Bakker, J. P., Domenech, R., Prach, K., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Veeneklaas, R. M., Pyšek, P., del Moral, R., Hobbs, R. J., Collins, S. L., Pickett, S. T. A., and Reich, P. B. 2005. Vegetation change: A reunifying concept in plant ecology. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 7:69–76.Google Scholar
  24. Davy, A. J., Dunsford, S. J., and Free, A. J. 1998. Acidifying peat as an aid to the reconstruction of lowland heath on arable soil: Lysimeter experiments. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:649–659.Google Scholar
  25. Diemer, M. W., Oetiker, K., and Billeter, R. 2001. Abandonment alters community composition and canopy structure of Swiss calcareous fens. Applied Vegetation Science 4:237–246.Google Scholar
  26. Diemont, W. H. 1994. Effects of removal of organic matter on productivity in heathlands. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:409–414.Google Scholar
  27. Dunsford, S. J, Free. A. J., and Davy, A. J. 1998. Acidifying peat as an aid to the reconstruction of lowland heaths on arable soil: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:660–672.Google Scholar
  28. Eschner, D., and Liste, H. H. 1995. Stoffdynamik wieder zu vernässende Niedermoore. Z.f. Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 36:113–116.Google Scholar
  29. Esselink, P. 2000. Nature management of coastal salt marshes: interactions between anthropogenic influences and natural dynamics. PhD-thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  30. Esselink, P., Zijlstra, W., Dijkema, K. S., and van Diggelen, R. 2000. The effects of decreased management on plant species distribution patterns in a salt marsh nature reserve in the Wadden Sea. Biological Conservation 93:61–76.Google Scholar
  31. Falinski, J. B. 1980. Vegetation dynamics and sex structure of the populations of pioneer dioecious woody plants. Vegetatio 43:23–38.Google Scholar
  32. Fukami, T., Bezemer, T. M., Mortimer, S. R., and van der Putten, W. H. 2005. Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecology Letters 8:1283–1290.Google Scholar
  33. Gibson, C. W. D., Watt, T. A., and Brown, V. K. 1987. The use of sheep grazing to create species rich grassland from abandoned arable land. Biological Conservation 42:165–183.Google Scholar
  34. Giller, K. E., and Wheeler, B. D. 1988. Acidification and succession in a flood-plain mire in the Norfolk Broadland, UK. Journal of Ecology 76:849–866.Google Scholar
  35. Gimingham, C. H. 1992. The Lowland Heathland Management Handbook. Peterborough: English Nature.Google Scholar
  36. Greipsson, S. 2002. Coastal dunes. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Vol. 2. M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–237.Google Scholar
  37. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Grootjans, A. P., Schipper, P. C., and van der Windt, H. J. 1985. Influence of drainage on N-mineralization and vegetation response in wet meadows. I: Calthion palustris stands. Oecologia Plantarum 6:403–417.Google Scholar
  39. Hansson, M., and Fogelfors, H. 2000. Management of a seminatural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in southern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:31–38.Google Scholar
  40. Harmer, R., Peterken, G., Kerr, G., and Poulton, P. 2001. Vegetation changes during 100 years of development of two secondary woodlands on abandoned arable land. Biological Conservation 101:291–304.Google Scholar
  41. Hauschild, J., and Scheffer, B., 1995. Zur Nitratbildung in Niedermoorböden in Abhängigkeit der Bodenfeuchte (Brutversuche). Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 36:151–152.Google Scholar
  42. Hill, M. O. 1990. Environmental consequences of set-aside land. Report of the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. Huntingdon, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  43. Hill, M. J., Braaten, R., Veitch, S. M., Lees, B. G., and Sharma, S. 2005. Multi-criteria decision analysis in spatial decision support: The ASSESS analytical hierarchy process and the role of quantitative methods and spatial explicit analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software 20:955–975.Google Scholar
  44. Hobbs, R. J., and Huenneke, L. F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324–337.Google Scholar
  45. Hodačová, D., and Prach, K. 2003. Spoil heaps from brown coal mining: technical reclamation vs. spontaneous re-vegetation. Restoration Ecology 11:385–391.Google Scholar
  46. Hodder, K. H., and Bullock, J. M. 1997. Translocations of native species in the UK: Implications for biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:547–565.Google Scholar
  47. Holl, K. D. 2002. Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:960–973.Google Scholar
  48. Hölzel, N., and Otte, A. 2003. Restoration of a species-rich flood meadow by topsoil removal and diaspore transfer with plant material. Applied Vegetation Science 6:131–140.Google Scholar
  49. Hunt, R., Middleton, D. A. J., Grime, J. P., and Hodgson, J. G. 1991. TRISTAR: An expert system for vegetation process. Expert Systems 8:219–226.Google Scholar
  50. Huston, M. A. 2004. Management strategies for plant invasions: Manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Diversity and Distributions 10:167–178.Google Scholar
  51. Jasnowski, M., and Kowalski, W. 1978. Das Eindringen von Sphagnum in kalziphile Pflanzengesellschaften in Naturschutzgebiet Tchorzyno. Phytocoenosis 7:71–89.Google Scholar
  52. Johnstone, I. M. 1986. Plant invasion windows: A time-based classification of invasion potential. Biological Review 61:369–394.Google Scholar
  53. Joosten, J. H. J. 1993. Denken wie ein Hochmoor: Hydrologische Selbstregulation von Hochmooren und deren Bedeutung für Wiedervernässung und Restauration. Telma 23:95–115.Google Scholar
  54. Kirmer, A., and Mahn, E.-G. 2001. Spontaneous and initiated succession on unvegetated slopes in the abandoned lignite-mining area of Goitsche, Germany. Applied Vegetation Science 4:19–27.Google Scholar
  55. Klimeš, L., and Klimešová, J. 2002. The effects of mowing and fertilization on carbohydrate reserves and regrowth of grasses: do they promote plant coexistence in species-rich meadows? Evolutionary Ecology 15:363–382.Google Scholar
  56. Klötzli, F. 1987. Disturbance in transplanted grasslands and wetlands. In: Disturbance in Grasslands. J. van Andel, J. P. Bakker, and R. W. Snaydon (eds.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Junk Publishers, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
  57. Koerselman, W., and Verhoeven, J. T. A. 1995. Eutrophication of fen systems: external and internal nutrient sources and restoration strategies. In: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Fojt, and R. A. Robertson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 91–112.Google Scholar
  58. Lammerts, E. J., and Grootjans, A. P. 1998. Key environmental variables determining the occurrence and life span of basiphilous dune slack vegetation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47:369–392.Google Scholar
  59. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536.Google Scholar
  60. Lucassen, E. C. H. E. T., Smolders, A. J. P., van de Crommenacker, J., and Roelofs, J. G. M. 2004. Effects of stagnating sulphate-rich groundwater on the mobility of phosphate in freshwater wetlands: A field experiment. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 160:117–131.Google Scholar
  61. Luken, J. O. 1990. Directing Ecological Succession. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Marrs, R. H. 1988. Vegetation change on lowland heaths and its relevance for conservation management. Journal of Environmental Management 26:127–149.Google Scholar
  63. Marrs, R. H. 1993. Soil fertility and nature conservation in Europe: Theoretical considerations and practical management solutions. Advances in Ecological Research 24:241–300.Google Scholar
  64. Marrs, R. H. 2002. Manipulating the chemical environment of the soil. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Vol. 1. M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–183.Google Scholar
  65. Marrs, R. H., and Bradshaw, A. D. 1993. Primary succession on man-made wastes: The importance of resource acquisition. In: Primary Succession on Land. J. Miles and D. W. H. Walton (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 221–248.Google Scholar
  66. Marrs, R. H., and Le Duc, M. G. 2000. Factors controlling vegetation change in long-term experiments designed to restore heathland in Breckland, UK. Applied Vegetation Science 3:135–146.Google Scholar
  67. Marrs, R. H., Johnson S. W., and Le Duc, M. G. 1998a. Control of bracken and restoration of heathland. VIII. The regeneration of the heathland community after 18 years of continued bracken control or six years of control followed by recovery. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:857–870.Google Scholar
  68. Marrs, R. H., Snow, C. S. R., Owen, K. M. and Evans, C. E. 1998b. Heathland and acid grassland creation on arable soils at Minsmere: Identification of potential problems and a test of cropping to impoverish soils. Biological Conservation 85:69–82.Google Scholar
  69. Matějková, I., van Diggelen, R., and Prach, K. 2003. An attempt to restore a central European mountain grassland through grazing. Applied Vegetation Science 6:161–168.Google Scholar
  70. McKay, J. K., Christian, C. E., Harrison, S., and Rice, K. J. 2005. “How local is local?” — A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.Google Scholar
  71. Milligan, A. L., Putwain, P. D., Cox, E. S., Ghorbani, J., Le Duc, M. G., and Marrs, R. H. 2004. Developing an integrated land management strategy for the restoration of moorland vegetation on Molinia caerulea -dominated vegetation for conservation purposes in upland Britain. Biological Conservation 119:371–387.Google Scholar
  72. Mitchell, R. J., Auld, M. H. D., Le Duc, M. G., and Marrs, R. H. 2000. Ecosystem stability and resilience: A review of their relevance for the conservation management of lowland heaths. Perspectives on Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3:142–160.Google Scholar
  73. Money, R. P. 1995. Restoration of cut-over peatlands: The role of hydrology in determining vegetation quality. In: Hydrology and Hydrochemistry of British Wetlands. J. Hughes and L. Heathwaite (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 383–400.Google Scholar
  74. Montalvo, A. M., McMillan, P. A., Allen, E. B. 2002. The relative importance of seeding method, soil ripping, and soil variables on seeding success. Restoration Ecology 101:52–67.Google Scholar
  75. Morecroft, M. D., Masters, G. J., Brown, V. K., Clarke, I. P., Taylor, M. E., and Whitehouse, A. T. 2004. Changing precipitation patterns alter plant community dynamics and succession in ex-arable grassland. Functional Ecology 18:648–655.Google Scholar
  76. Mouissie, A. M., Vos, P., Verhagen, H. M. C., and Bakker, J. P. 2006. Endozoochory by free-ranging, large herbivores: Ecological correlates and perspectives for restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 6:547–558.Google Scholar
  77. Munshower, F. F. 1994. Practical Handbook of Disturbed Land Revegetation. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.Google Scholar
  78. Myers, J. H., and Bazely, D. R. 2003. Ecology and Control of Introduced Plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Ninot, J. M., Herrero, P., Ferré, A., and Guardia, R. 2001. Effects of reclamation measures on plant colonization on lignite waste in the eastern Pyrenees, Spain. Applied Vegetation Science 4:29–34.Google Scholar
  80. Noble, I. R. 1987. The role of expert systems in vegetation science. Vegetatio 69:115–121.Google Scholar
  81. Nová k, J. and Prach, K. 2003. Vegetation succession in basalt quarries: pattern over a landscape scale. Applied Vegetation Science 6:111–116.Google Scholar
  82. Olde Venterink, H., Wassen, M. J., Verkroost, A. W. M., and de Ruiter, P. 2003. Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands. Ecology 84:2191–2199.Google Scholar
  83. Olson, D. M., and Dinerstein, E. 1998. The global 200: A representation approach to conserving the earth's most biologically valuable ecosystems. Conservation Biology 12:502–515.Google Scholar
  84. Olsson, E. G. 1987. Effects of dispersal mechanisms on the initial pattern of old-field forest succession. Acta Oecologica 8:379–390.Google Scholar
  85. Oomes, M. J. M., and Mooi, H. 1981. The effect of cutting and fertilizing on the floristic composition and production of an Arrhenaterion grassland. Vegetatio 47:233–239.Google Scholar
  86. Osbornová, J., Kovářová, M., Lepš, J., and Prach, K. (eds.). 1990. Succession in Abandoned Fields: Studies in Central Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  87. Owen, K. M., and Marrs, R. H. 2000a. Creation of heathland on former arable land at Minsmere, Suffolk: The effect of soil acidification on the establishment of Calluna and ruderal species. Biological Conservation 93:9–18.Google Scholar
  88. Owen, K. M., and Marrs, R. H. 2000b. Acidifying arable soils for the restoration of acid grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science 3:105–116.Google Scholar
  89. Owen, K. M., Marrs, R. H., Snow, C. S. R., and Evans, C. 1999. Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic litters to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK. Biological Conservation 87:105–122.Google Scholar
  90. Parker, V. T. 1997. The scale of successional models and restoration objectives. Restoration Ecology 5:301–306.Google Scholar
  91. Perkins, D. F. 1978. The distribution and transfer of energy and nutrients in the Agrostis-Festuca grassland ecosystem. In: Production Ecology of British Moors and Montane Grasslands. O. W. Heal and D. F. Perkins (eds.). Berlin: Springer, pp. 375–396.Google Scholar
  92. Perrow, M. R., and Davy, A. J. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Pfadenhauer, J., Höper, H., Borkowski, B., Roth, S., Seeger, S., and Wagner, C. 2001. Entwicklung planzenartreichen Niedermoorgrünlands. In: Ökosystemmanagement für Niedermoore; Strategien und Verfahren zur Renaturierung. R. Kratz and J. Pfadenhauer (eds.). Stuttgart, Hohenheim: Ulmer Verlag, pp. 134–155.Google Scholar
  94. Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. 1987. Models, mechanisms, and pathways of succession. Botanical Review 53:335–371.Google Scholar
  95. Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M., and Bartla, S. 2001. Implications from the Buell-Small Succession Study for vegetation restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 4:41–52.Google Scholar
  96. Poschlod, P., and Bonn, S. 1998. Changing dispersal processes in the central European landscape since the last ice age: An explanation for the actual decrease of plant species richness in different habitats? Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47:27–44.Google Scholar
  97. Poulin, M., Rochefort, L., and Desrochers, A. 1999. Conservation of bog plant species assemblages, assessing the role of natural remnants in mined sites. Applied Vegetation Science 2:169–180.Google Scholar
  98. Prach, K. 1985. Succession of vegetation in abandoned fields in Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 22:307–314.Google Scholar
  99. Prach, K. 1987. Succession of vegetation on dumps from strip coal mining, N.W.Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 22:339–354.Google Scholar
  100. Prach, K. 2003. Spontaneous vegetation succession in central European man-made habitats: What information can be used in restoration practice? Applied Vegetation Science 6:125–129.Google Scholar
  101. Prach, K., and Pyšek, P. 2001. Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: Experience from central Europe. Ecological Engineering 17:55–62.Google Scholar
  102. Prach, K., Pyšek, P., and šmilauer, P. 1999. Prediction of vegetation succession in human-disturbed habitats using an expert system. Restoration Ecology 7:15–23.Google Scholar
  103. Prach, K., Bartha, S., Joyce, C. B., Pyšek, P., van Diggelen, R., and Wiegleb, G. 2001. The role of spontaneous succession in ecological restoration: A perspective. Applied Vegetation Science 4:111–114.Google Scholar
  104. Prach, K., Lepš, J., and Rejmánek, M. in press. Old field succession in Central Europe: Local and regional patterns. In: Old fields: Dynamics and Restoration of Abandoned Farmland. V.A. Cramer and R.J. Hobbs (eds.). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  105. Pyšek, P., Kučera, T., Puntieri, J., and Mandák, B. 1995. Regeneration in Heracleum mantegazzianum: Response to removal of vegetative and generative parts. Preslia 67:161–171.Google Scholar
  106. Pyšek, P., Davis, M. A., Daehler, C. C., and Thompson, K. 2004a. Plant invasions and vegetation succession: Closing the gap. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 85:105–109.Google Scholar
  107. Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G., Williamson, M., and Kirschner, J. 2004b. Alien plants in checklists and floras: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143.Google Scholar
  108. Pywell, R. F., Webb, N. R. and Putwain, P. D. 1994. Soil fertility and its implications for the restoration of heathland on farmland in southern Britain. Biological Conservation 70:169–181.Google Scholar
  109. Pywell, R. F., Webb, N. R., and Putwain, P. D. 1997. The decline of heathland seed populations following conversion to agriculture. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:949–960.Google Scholar
  110. Pywell, R. F., Bullock, J. M., Hopkins, A., Walker, K. J., Sparks, T. H., Burke, M. J. W., and Peel, S. 2002a. Restoring of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:249–264.Google Scholar
  111. Pywell, R. F., Pakeman, R. J., Allchin, E. A., Bourn, N. A. D., Warman, E. A., and Walker, K. J. 2002b. The potential for lowland heath regeneration following plantation removal. Biological Conservation 108:247–258.Google Scholar
  112. Pywell, R. F., Bullock, J. M., Roy, D. B., Warman, L., Walker, K. J., and Rothery, P. 2003. Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:65–77.Google Scholar
  113. Řehounková, K., and Prach, K. 2006. Spontaneous vegetation succession in disused gravel-sand pits: Role of site conditions and landscape context. Journal of Vegetation Science.Google Scholar
  114. Rejmánek, M. 1989. Invasibility of plant communities. In: Biological Invasions. A Global Perspective. J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 369–388.Google Scholar
  115. Rejmánek, M. 1990. Foreword. Old and new fields of old-field ecology. In: Succession in Abandoned Fields. Studies in Central Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. J. Osbornová, M. Kovářová, J. Lepš, and K. Prach (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluver, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  116. Rejmánek, M., and van Katwyk, K. P. 2004. Old-field succession: A bibliographic review (1901–1991). []Google Scholar
  117. Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., and West, C. J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93–107.Google Scholar
  118. Richardson, D. M., Holmes, P. M., Esler, K. J., Galatowitsch, S. M., Kirkman, S., Stromberg, J. C., Hobbs, R. J., and Pyšek, P. in press. Riparian zone: Degradation, alien plant invasions and restoration prospects. Diversity and Distributions.Google Scholar
  119. Roberts, R. D., Marrs, R. H., Skeffington, R. A., and Bradshaw, A. D. 1981. Ecosystem development on naturally-colonized china clay wastes. I. Vegetation change and overall accumulation of organic matter and nutrients. Journal of Ecology 69:153–161.Google Scholar
  120. Ruprecht, E. 2005. Secondary succession in old-fields in the Transylvanian Lowland (Romania). Preslia 77:145–157.Google Scholar
  121. Ruprecht E. 2006. Successfully recovered grassland: A promising example from Romanian old-fields. Restoration Ecology 14:473–480.Google Scholar
  122. Salonen, V., Penttinen, A., and Sarkka, A. 1992. Plant colonization of a bare peat surface, population changes and spatial patterns. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:113–118.Google Scholar
  123. Scheffer, M. 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in fresh-water systems. Hydrobiologia 200:475–486.Google Scholar
  124. Schmidt, W. 1983. Experimentelle Syndynamic—Neuere Wege zu einer exakten Sukzessionsforschung, dargestellt am Beispiel der Gehölzentwicklung auf Ackerbrachen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 96: 511–533.Google Scholar
  125. Schmidt W. 1988. An experimental study of old-field succession in relation to different environmental factors. Vegetatio 77: 103–114.Google Scholar
  126. šeffer, J., and Stanová V. (eds.). 1999. Morava River Floodplain Meadows—Importance, Restoration and Management. Bratislava, Slovakia: Daphne.Google Scholar
  127. Settele, J., Margules, C., Poschlod, P., and Henle, K. (eds.). 1996. Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  128. Shear, T. H., Lent, T. J., and Fraver, S. 1996. Comparison of restored and mature bottomland hardwood forests of southwestern Kentucky. Restoration Ecology 4:111–123.Google Scholar
  129. Strykstra, R. J., Verweij, G. L., and Bakker, J. P. 1997. Seed dispersal by mowing machinery in a Dutch brook valley system. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 46:387–401.Google Scholar
  130. Symonides E. 1985. Floristic richness, diversity, dominance and species evenness in old-field successional ecosystems. Ekologia Polska 33:61–79.Google Scholar
  131. Temperton, V. M., Hobbs, R. J., Nuttle, T., and Halle, S. (eds.). 2004. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  132. Tilman, D. 1988. Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  133. Tong, C., Le Duc, M. G., Ghorbani, J., and Marrs, R. H. 2006. Linking restoration to the wider landscape: A study of a bracken control experiment within an upland moorland landscape mosaic in the Peak District, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 78(1-2):115–134.Google Scholar
  134. van Andel, J., and Aronson, J. (eds.). 2006. Restoration Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  135. van der Hoek, D. 2005. The effectiveness of restoration measures in species-rich fen meadows. PhD-thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  136. van Diggelen, R., and Grootjans, A. 1999. Restoration prospects of degraded lowland brook valleys in The Netherlands: An example from Gorecht Area. In: An International Perspective on Wetland Rehabilitation. W. Streever (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 189–196.Google Scholar
  137. van Diggelen, R., Molenaar, W. J., and Kooijman, A. M. 1996. Vegetation succession in a floating mire in relation to management and hydrology. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:809–820.Google Scholar
  138. van Diggelen, R., Sijtsma, F. J., Strijker, D., and van den Burg, J. 2005. Relating land-use intensity and biodiversity at the regional scale. Basic and Applied Ecology 6:145–159.Google Scholar
  139. van Duren, I. C., Pegtel, D. M., Aerts, B. A., and Inberg, J. A. 1997. Nutrient supply in undrained and drained Calthion meadows. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:829–838.Google Scholar
  140. van Wirdum, G. 1995. The regeneration of fens in abandoned peat pits below sea level in The Netherlands. In: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Fojt, and R. A. Robertson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 251–272.Google Scholar
  141. Vécrin, M. P., and Muller, S. 2003. Top-soil translocation as a technique in the re-creation of species-rich meadows. Applied Vegetation Science 6:271–278.Google Scholar
  142. Vécrin, M. P., van Diggelen, R., Grevilliot, F., and Muller, S. 2002. Restoration of species-rich flood-plain meadows from abandoned arable fields in NE France. Applied Vegetation Science 5:263–270.Google Scholar
  143. Verhagen, R., Klooker, J., Bakker, J. P., and van Diggelen, R. 2001. Restoration success of low-production plant communities on former agricultural soils after top-soil removal. Applied Vegetation Science 4:75–82.Google Scholar
  144. Wali, M. K. (ed.). 1992. Ecosystem Rehabilitation. Vol. 1: Policy Issues; Vol. 2: Ecosystem Analysis and Synthesis. The Hague: SPB.Google Scholar
  145. Walker, J., and Reuter, D. J. 1996. Indicators of Catchment Health: A Technical Perspective. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  146. Walker, L. R. (ed.). 1999. Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Ecosystems of the World 16. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  147. Walker, L. R., and del Moral, R. 2003. Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  148. WallisDeVries, M. F., Bakker, J. P., and van Wieren, S. E. 1998. Grazing and Conservation Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  149. Wassen, M. J., van Diggelen, R., Wolejko, L., and Verhoeven, J. T. H. 1996. A comparison of fens in natural and artificial landscapes. Vegetatio 126:5–26.Google Scholar
  150. Webb, N. R. 2002. Atlantic heathlands. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Vol. 2. M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–418.Google Scholar
  151. Werger, M. J. A., Prentice, I. C., and Helspen, H. P. A. 1985. The effect of sod-cutting to different depths on Calluna heathland regeneration. Journal of Environmental Management 20:181–189.Google Scholar
  152. Whisenant, S. G. 1999. Repairing Damaged Wildlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Whisenant, S. G. 2002. Terrestrial systems. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Vol. 1. M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
  154. Wiegleb, G., and Felinks, B. 2001. Predictability of early stages of primary succession in post-mining landscapes of Lower Lusatia, Germany. Applied Vegetation Science 4:5–18.Google Scholar
  155. Wolejko, L., Aggenbach, C., van Diggelen, R., and Grootjans, A. P. 1994. Vegetation and hydrology in a spring mire complex in western Pomerania, Poland. Proceedings van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen 97:219–245.Google Scholar
  156. Wolf, G. 1985. Primäre Sukzession auf kiesig-sandigen Rohböden im Rheinischen Braunkohlenrevier. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 16:1–208.Google Scholar
  157. Wolters, M., Garbutt, A., and Bakker, J. P. 2005. Recreation of intertidal habitat: Evaluating the success of de-embankments in north-west Europe. Biological Conservation 123:249–268.Google Scholar
  158. Zavaleta, E., Hobbs, R. J., and Mooney, H. A. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole ecosystem context. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:454–459.Google Scholar
  159. Zobel, M., van der Maarel, E., and Dupré, C. 1998. Species pool: The concept, its determination and significance for community restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 1:55–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel Prach
  • Rob Marrs
  • Petr Pyšsek
  • Rudy van Diggelen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations