Advertisement

Succession and Restoration of Drained Fens: Perspectives from Northwestern Europe

  • Joachim Schrautzer
  • Andreas Rinker
  • Kai Jensen
  • Felix Mϋller
  • Peter Schwartze
  • Klaus Dierßen
Part of the SPRINGER SERIES ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT book series (SSEM)

Abstract

*

Keywords

Species Richness Seed Bank Seed Longevity Microbial Soil Respiration Longevity Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asada, T., Warner, B. G., and Schiff, S. L. 2005. Effects of shallow flooding on vegetation and carbon pools in boreal wetlands. Applied Vegetation Science 8:199-208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, J. P. 1989. Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, J. P., and Berendse, F. 1999. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:63-68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker, J. P., and Grootjans, A. P. 1991. Potential for vegetation regeneration in the middle course of the Drentsche A Brook valley (The Netherlands). Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft frkologie 20:249-263.Google Scholar
  5. Bakker, J. P., and Olff, H. 1995. Nutrient dynamics during restoration of fen meadows by hay making without fertilizer application. In: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. B. D. Wheeler, S. C., Shaw, W. J., Foijt, and A. Robertson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley and Sons, pp. 143-166.Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, J. P., Poschlod, P., Strijkstra, R. J., Bekker, R. M., and Thompson, K. 1996. Seed bank dynamics and seed dispersal: Important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47:15-26.Google Scholar
  7. Bekker, R. M., Verweij, G. L., Smith, R. E. N., Reine, R., Bakker, J. P., and Sneider, S. 1997. Soil seed banks in European grasslands: Does land use affect regeneration perspectives? Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1293-1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bekker, R. M., Bakker, J. P., Grandin, U., Kalamees, R., Milberg, P., Poschlod, P., Thompson, K., and Willems, J. H. 1998a. Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: Indicators of seed longevity. Functional Ecology 12:834-842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekker, R. M., Schaminee, J. H. J., Bakker, J. P., and Thompson, K. 1998b. Seed bank characteristics of Dutch plant communities. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47:15-26.Google Scholar
  10. Berendse, F., Oomes, M. J. M., Altena, H. J., and de Visser, W. 1994. A comparative study of nitrogen flows in two similar meadows affected by different groundwater levels. Journal of Applied Ecology 31:40-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blankenburg, J., Hennings, H. H., and Schmidt, W. 2001. Bodenphysikalische Eigenschaften von Torfen und Wiedervernsung. In: kosystemmanagement Fr Niedermoore. Strategien und Verfahren zur Renaturierung. R. Kratz and J. Pfadenhauer (eds.). Stuttgart, Germany: Eugen Ulmer, pp. 81-91.Google Scholar
  12. Boeye, D., Verhagen, B., van Haesebroeck, V., and Verheyen, R. F. 1997. Nutrient limitation in species-rich lowland fens. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:415-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonn, S., and Poschlod, P. 1998. Ausbreitungsbiologie der Pflanzen Mitteleuropas. Wiesbaden, Germany: Quelle and Meyer.Google Scholar
  14. Bragg, O., and Lindsay, R. (eds.). 2003. Strategy and Action Plan for Mire and Peatland Conservation in Central Europe. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wetlands International.Google Scholar
  15. Davidsson, T., Trepel, M., and Schrautzer, J. 2002. Denitrification in drained and rewetted minerotrophic peat soils in Northern Germany (Pohnsdorfer Stauung). Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 165:199-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denny, P. 1987. Mineral cycling by wetland plants. A review. Archiv Hydrobiologische Beihefte 27:1-25.Google Scholar
  17. Diemer, M., Oetiker, K., and Billeter, R. 2001. Abandonment alters community composition and canopy structure of Swiss calcareous fens. Applied Vegetation Science 4:237-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Döring-Mederake, U. 1991. Feuchtwälder im nordwestdeutschen Tiefland. Gliederung—Ökologie—Schutz. Göttingen: Scripta Geobotanica 19.Google Scholar
  19. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency of the United States) 2006. Description of wetland types. [http://epa.gov/owow/wetlands/types/fen.html].Google Scholar
  20. Finck, P., Riecken, U., and Schröder, E. 2001. Pasture landscapes and nature conservation. New strategies for preservation of open landscapes in Europe. In: Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation. B. Redecker, P., Finck, U., Riecken, and W. Härdtle (eds.). Berlin: Springer, pp. 1-14.Google Scholar
  21. Foster, B. L. 1999. Establishment, competition and the distribution of native grasses among Michigan old-fields. Journal of Ecology 87:476-489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fraser, L. H. and Keddy, P. A. 2005. The World's Largest Wetlands—Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. GEC (Global Environment Centre) 2003. ASEAN Peatland Management Initiative. Sustainable Management of Peatlands: Wise Use, Prevention of Fires and Rehabilitation of Peatland. [www.peat-portal.net]Google Scholar
  24. Gough, L., Grace. J. B., and Taylor, K. L. 1994. The relationships between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables. Oikos 70:271-279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J. G., and Hunt, R. 1990. The Abridged Comparative Plant Ecology. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Grime, J. P. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Grootjans, A. P., and van Diggelen, R. 1995. Assessing the restoration prospects of degraded fens. In: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Foijtt, and A. Robertson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 73-90.Google Scholar
  28. Grootjans, A. P., Schipper, P. C., and van der Windt, H. J. 1986. Influence of drainage on N-mineralisation and vegetation response in wet meadows. II: Cirsio-Molinietum stands. Oecologia Plantarum 7:3-14.Google Scholar
  29. Grootjans, A.P., van Wirdum, G., Kemmers, R., and van Diggelen, R. 1996. Ecohydrology in the Netherlands: Principles of an application-driven interdiscipline. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45:491-516.Google Scholar
  30. Grootjans, A. P., Bakker, J. P., Jansen, A. J. M., and Kemmers, R. H. 2002. Restoration of brook valley meadows in The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478:149-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Güsewell, S., and Klötzli, F. 1998. Abundance of common reed (Phragmites australis), site conditions and conservation value of fen meadows in Switzerland. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47:113-129.Google Scholar
  32. Hald, A. B., and Vinther, E. 2000. Restoration of a species-rich fen-meadow after abandonment: Response of 64 plant species to management. Applied Vegetation Science 3:15-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Härdtle, W., Mierwald, U., Behrends, T., Eischeid, I., Garniel, U., Grell, H., Haese, D., Schneider-Fenske, A., and Voigt, N. 2001. Pasture landscapes in Germany—progress towards sustainable use of agricultural land. In: Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation. B. Redecker, P. Finck, U. Riecken, and W. Härdtle (eds.). Berlin: Springer, pp. 147-160.Google Scholar
  34. Hendriks, R. F. A. 1993. Nutrientenbelasting van oppervlaktewater in veenweidegebieden. Wageningen, DLO-Staring Centrum, Rapport 251.Google Scholar
  35. Hölzel, N., and Otte, A. 2001. The impact of flooding regime on the soil seed bank of flood-meadows. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:209-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jedicke, E. 1995. Ressourcenschutz und Prozesschutz. Diskussion notwendiger Ansätze zu einem ganzheitlichen Naturschutz. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 27:125-133.Google Scholar
  37. Jensen, K. 1998. Species composition of soil seed bank and seed rain of abandoned wet meadows and their relation to aboveground vegetation. Flora 139:345-359.Google Scholar
  38. Jensen, K. 2004. Langlebigkeit der Diasporenbanken von Arten der Niedermoorflora Nordwest-Deutschlands: Überblick und Methodenvergleich. Berichte der Reinhold-Tüxen-Gesellschaft 16:17-28.Google Scholar
  39. Jensen, K., and Schrautzer, J. 1999. Consequences of abandonment for a regional fen flora and mechanism of succession change. Applied Vegetation Science 2:79-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jensen, K., and Gutekunst, K. 2003. Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: The role of seed size and successional status. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:579-587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Joergensen, S. E. 2001. A general outline of thermodynamic approaches to ecosystem theory. In: Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management. S. E. Joergensen and F. Müller (eds.). New York: CRC Publishers, pp. 113-134.Google Scholar
  42. Joosten, H., and Couwenberg, J. 2001. Bilanzen zum Moorverlust — das Beispiel Europa. In: Landschaftsökologische Moorkunde. M. Succow and H. Joosten (eds.). Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, pp. 406-409.Google Scholar
  43. Kieckbusch, J., Schrautzer, J., and Trepel, M. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity of water pathways in degenerated riverine peatlands. Basic and Applied Ecology 7:388-397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koerselman, W., and Verhoeven, J. T. A. 1992. Nutrient dynamics in mires of various status: Nutrient inputs and outputs and the internal nutrient cycle. In: Fens and Bogs in The Netherlands: Vegetation, History, Nutrient Dynamics and Conservation. J. T. A. Verhoeven (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 397-432.Google Scholar
  45. Koerselman, W., and Verhoeven, J. T. A. 1995. Eutrophication of fen ecosystems: External and internal nutrient sources and restoration strategies. In: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, J. W. Foijtt, and A. Robertson (eds.). Chichester: Wiley, pp. 91-112.Google Scholar
  46. Kotowski, W., van Andel, J., van Diggelen, R., and Hogendorf, J. 2001. Responses of fen plant species to groundwater level and light intensity. Plant Ecology 155:147-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kotowski, W., and van Diggelen, R. 2004. Light as an environmental filter in fen vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:583-594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kutsch, W., Dilly, O., Steinborn, W., and Müller, F. 1998. Quantifying ecosystem maturity—a case study. In: Eco Targets, Goal Functions and Orientors. F. Müller and M. Leupelt (eds.). New York: Springer, pp. 209-231.Google Scholar
  49. Kutsch, W., Eschenbach, C., Dilly, O., Middelhoff, U., Steinborn, W., Vanselow, R., Weisheit, K., Wötzel, J., and Kappen, L. 2000. The carbon cycle of contrasting landscape elements of the Bornhöved Lake District. Ecological Studies 147:75-95.Google Scholar
  50. Kutsch, W., Steinborn, W., Herbst, M., Baumann, R., Barkmann, J., and Kappen, L. 2001. Environmental indication: A field test of an ecosystem approach to quantify biological self-organization. Ecosystems 4:49-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leonardsson, L., Bengtson, L., Davidsson, T., Persson, T., and Emanuelsson, U. 1994. Nitrogen retention in artificially flooded meadows. Ambio 23:332-334.Google Scholar
  52. Mitsch, W.J., and Gosselink, J. G. 2000. Wetlands. 3rd edn. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Moore, D. R. J., Keddy, P. A., Gaudet, C. L., and Wisheu, I. C. 1989. Conservation of wetlands: Do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority? Biological Conservation 47:203-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Müller, F. 1998. Gradients, potentials and flows in ecological systems. Ecological Modelling 108:3-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller, F., and Fath, B. 1998. The physical basis of ecological goal functions—An Integrative Discussion. In: Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors. F. Müller and M. Leupelt (eds.). New York: Springer, pp. 269-285.Google Scholar
  56. Müller, F., and Joergensen, S. E. 2000. Ecological orientors: A path to environmental applications of ecosystem theories. In: Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management. S. E. Joergensen and F. Müller (eds.). New York: CRC Publishers, pp. 561-576.Google Scholar
  57. Müller, F., Schrautzer, J., Reiche, E. W., and Rinker, A. 2006: Ecosystem based indicators in retrogressive successions of an agricultural landscape. In: Ecological Indicators 6:63-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Odum, H. T., Brown, M. T., and Ulgiati, S. 2000. Ecosystems as energetic systems. In: Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management. S. E. Joergensen and F. Müller (eds.). Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Okruszko, H. 1993. Transformation of fen-peat soil under the impact of draining. Zeszyty Problemowe Postepow Nauk Rolniczych 406:3-73.Google Scholar
  60. Olde Venterink, H. 2000. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium flows controlling plant productivity and species richness; eutrophication and nature management in fens and meadows. PhD Thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  61. Pfadenhauer, J., and Grootjans, A. P. 1999. Wetland restoration in Central Europe. Aims and methods. Applied Vegetation Science 2:95-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ramsar Convention 2002. Resolution VIII.17 on Global Action on Peatlands. [www.ramsar.org/key_res_viii_17_e.html]Google Scholar
  63. Reiche, E. W. 1994. Modelling water and nitrogen dynamics on catchment scale. Ecological Modelling 75/76:372-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosenthal, G., Hildebrandt, J., Zöckler, C., Hengstenberg, M., Mossakowski, D., Lakomy, W., and Burfeindt, I. 1998. Feuchtgrünland in Nordeutschland. ökologie, Zustand, Schutzkonzepte. Münster, Germany: Bundesamt für Naturschutz Schriftenvertrieb.Google Scholar
  65. Roth, S., Seeger, T., Poschlod, P., Pfadenhauer, J., and Succow, M. 1999. Establishment of halophytes in the course of fen restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 2:131-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Runhaar, J., van Gool, C. R., and Groen, C. L. G. 1996. Impact of hydrological changes on nature conservation areas in The Netherlands. Biological Conservation 76:269-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sach, W. 1999. Vegetation und Nährstoffdynamik unterschiedlich genutzten Grünlandes in Schleswig-Holstein. Dissertationes Botanicae 308, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  68. Schaffers, A. P. 2002. Soil, biomass and management of semi-natural vegetation. Part II. Factors controlling species diversity. Plant Ecology 158:247-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schieferstein, B. 1997. Ökologische und molekularbiologische Untersuchungen am Schilf (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Staud.) im Bereich der Bornhöveder Seenkette. EcoSys 22, Kiel.Google Scholar
  70. Schneider, E. D. and Kay, J. J. 1994. Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 19:25-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schrautzer, J. 1988. Pflanzensoziologische und standörtliche Charakteristik von Seggenriedern und Feuchtwiesen in Schleswig-Holstein. Mitteilungen der AG Geobotanik in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg 38, Kiel.Google Scholar
  72. Schrautzer, J. 2004. Niedermoore Schleswig-Holsteins: Charakterisierung und Beurteilung ihrer Funktion im Landschaftshaushalt. Mitteilungen der AG Geobotanik in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg 63, Kiel.Google Scholar
  73. Schrautzer, J., and Wiebe, C. 1993. Geobotanische Charakterisierung und Entwicklung des Grünlandes in Schleswig-Holstein. Phytocoenologica 22:105-144.Google Scholar
  74. Schrautzer, J., Asshoff, M., and Müller, F. 1996. Restoration strategies for wet grasslands in Northern Germany. Ecological Engineering 7:255-278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schrautzer, J., and Jensen, K. 2006. Relationship between light availability and species richness during fen grassland succession. Nordic Journal of Botany (in press).Google Scholar
  76. Schwartze, P. 1992. Nordwestdeutsche Feuchtgrünlandgesellschaften unter kontrollierten Nutzungsbedingungen. Dissertationes Botanicae 183, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  77. Schwartze, P. 2003. Einfluss von Brache und Nutzung auf Feuchtgrünlandvegetation im Münsterland. Kieler Notizen zur Pflanzenkunde. Schleswig-Holstein Hamburg 31:185-196.Google Scholar
  78. Stammel, B., Kiehl, K., and Pfadenhauer, J. 2003. Alternative management on fens: Response of vegetation to grazing and mowing. Applied Vegetation Science 6:245-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Svirezhev, Y. M., and Steinborn, W. 2001. Exergy of solar radiation: Thermodynamic approach. Ecological Modelling 145:101-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thompson, K., Bakker, J. P., and Bekker, R. M. 1997. The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  81. Trepel, M. 2000. Quantifizierung der Stickstoffdynamik von Ökosystemen auf Niedermoorböden mit dem Modellsystem WASMOD. EcoSys 29, Kiel.Google Scholar
  82. Updegraff, K., Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J., and Johnston, C. A. 1995. Environmental and substrate controls over carbon and nitrogen mineralization in northern wetlands. Ecological Applications 5:151-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. van den Broek, T., van Diggelen, R., and Bobbink, R. 2005. Variation in seed buoyancy of species in wetland ecosystems with different flooding dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:579-586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van Diggelen, R., Grootjans, A. P., and Burkunk, R. 1994. Assessing restoration perspectives of disturbed brook valleys: The Gorecht area, The Netherlands. Restoration Ecology 2:87-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. van Dijk, J., Stroetenga, M., Bos, L., van Bodgom, P. M., Verhoef, H. A., and Aerts, R. 2004. Restoring natural seepage conditions on former agricultural grassland does not lead to reduction of organic matter decomposition and soil nutrient dynamics. Biogeochemistry 71:317-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. van Duren, I. C., Boeye, D., and Grootjans, A. P. 1998. Nutrient limitations in an extant and drained poor fen: Implications for restoration. Plant Ecology 133:91-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. van Duren, I. C., Strijkstra, R. J., Grootjans, A. P., ter Heerdt, G. J. N., and Pegtel, D. M. 1998. A multidisciplinary evaluation of restoration measures in a degraded Cirsio-Molinietum fen meadow. Applied Vegetation Science 1:115-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wassen, M. J., van Diggelen, R., Verhoeven, J. T. A., and Wolejko, L. 1996. A comparison of fens in natural and artificial landscapes. Vegetatio 126:5-26.Google Scholar
  89. Wassen, M. J., Olde Venterink, H., Lapshina, E. D., and Tanneberger, F. 2005. Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation. Nature 437:547-550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wetlands International Russia. 2003. Action Plan for Peatland Conservation and Wise Use in Russia. Moscow, Russia: Wetlands International Russia Programme.Google Scholar
  91. Wheeler, B. D., and Shaw, S. C. 1991. Above-ground crop mass and species richness of the principle types of herbaceous rich-fen vegetation of lowland England and Wales. Journal of Ecology 79:285-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson, J. B. 1990. Mechanisms of species coexistence: Twelve explanations for Hutchinson's “paradox of the plankton”: Evidence from New Zealand plant communities. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 18:176-181.Google Scholar
  93. Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G. 1993. Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. Ottawa, Canada: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  94. Zeitz, J. 1992. Bodenphysikalische Eigenschaften von Substrat-Horizont-Gruppen in landwirtschaftlich genutzten Niedermooren. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 33:301-307.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Schrautzer
  • Andreas Rinker
  • Kai Jensen
  • Felix Mϋller
  • Peter Schwartze
  • Klaus Dierßen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations