Advertisement

Forging a New Alliance Between Succession and Restoration

  • Lawrence R. R. Walker
  • Joe Walker
  • Roger del Moral
Part of the SPRINGER SERIES ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT book series (SSEM)

Abstract

Howdoes succession take place, after all, and what are the adaptive cycles, if any, and the feedback systems, assembly rules and other inherent functional, evolutionary or simply dynamic mechanisms that make ecosystems develop and interact in one way or another? If we can sort these questions out—biome by biome—then we will unquestionably be better placed to predict how much time, energy and capital of all sorts will be required, or should be allocated, to ecological restoration and rehabilitation. (Aronson and van Andel 2006)

Keywords

Restoration Project Restoration Effort Assembly Rule Plant Succession Seed Rain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aradottir, A. L., and Eysteinsson, T. 2004. Restoration of birch woodlands in Iceland. In: Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. J. Stanturf and P. Madsen (eds.). Boca Raton: CRC/Lewis, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, J., and van Andel, J. 2006. Challenges for ecological theory. In: Restoration Ecology. J. van Andel and J. Aronson (eds.). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, pp. 223–233.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., Floret, C., LeFloc'h, E, Ovalle, C., and Pontanier, R. 1993. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semiarid regions. I. A view from the South. Restoration Ecology 1:8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardgett, R. D., Bowman, W. D., Kaufman, R., and Schmidt, S. K. 2005. A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:634–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, J. G., Fagan, W. F., Schade, J. D., and Crisafulli, C. M. 2005. Causes and consequences of herbivory on prairie lupine (Lupinus lepidus) in early primary succession. In: Ecological Responses to the 1980 Eruption of Mount St. Helens. V. H. Dale, F. J. Swanson, and C. M. Crisafulli (eds.). New York: Springer, pp. 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolling, J. D., and Walker, L. R. 2000. Plant and soil recovery along a series of abandoned desert roads. Journal of Arid Environments 46:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, A. D. 1952. Populations of Agrostis tenuis resistant to lead and zinc poisoning. Nature 169:1098.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw, A. D., and Chadwick, M. J. 1980. The Restoration of Land: The Ecology and Reclamation of Derelict and Degraded Land. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Bronstein, J. L. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruno, J. F. 2000. Facilitation of cobble beach plant communities through habitat modification by Spartina alterniflora. Ecology 81:1179–1192.Google Scholar
  11. Bruno, J. F., Stachowicz, J. J., and Bertness, M. D. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cairns, J. (ed.). 1980. The Recovery Process in Damaged Ecosystems. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Cairns, J., and Heckman, J. R. 1996. Restoration ecology: The state of an emerging field. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 21:167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callaway, R. M., and Walker, L. R. 1997. Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–1965.Google Scholar
  15. Chapin, F. S., III., Walker, L. R., Fastie, C. L., and Sharman, L. C. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs 64:149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Claasen, V. P., and Hogan, M. P. 2002. Soil nitrogen pools associated with revegetation of disturbed sites in the Lake Tahoe area. Restoration Ecology 10:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication.Google Scholar
  18. Clements, F. E. 1928. Plant Succession and Indicators. New York: H.W. Wilson.Google Scholar
  19. Cody, M. 2000. Slow-motion population dynamics in Mojave Desert perennial plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connell, J. H., and Slatyer, R. O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their roles in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist 111:1119–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, J. A. 1999. Mining. In: Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. L. Walker (ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 365–384.Google Scholar
  22. Corbin, J. D., and D'Antonio, C. M. 2004. Competition between native perennial and exotic annual grasses: Implications for an historical invasion. Ecology 85:1273–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell, B. D. 1992. Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cowles, H. C. 1899. The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. 1. Geographical relations of the dune flora. Botanical Gazette 27:95–117, 167–202, 281–308, 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cowles, H. C. 1901. The physiographic ecology of Chicago and vicinity: A study of the origin, development, and classification of plant societies. Botanical Gazette 31:73–108, 145–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crews, T., Kitayama, K, Fownes, J., Riley, R. Herbert, D., Mueller-Dombois, D., and Vitousek, P. 1995. Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Ecology 76:1407–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daehler, C. C., and Goergen, E. M. 2005. Experimental restoration of an indigenous Hawaiian grassland after invasion by Buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Restoration Ecology 13:380–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davidson, D. W. 1993. The effects of herbivory and granivory on terrestrial plant succession. Oikos 68:23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davis, M. A., Pergl, J., Truscott, A.-M., Kollmann, J., Bakker, J. P., Domenech, R., Prach, K., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Veeneklaas, R. M., Pyšek, P., del Moral, R., Hobbs, R. J., Collins, S. L., Pickett, S. T. A., and Reich, P. B. 2005. Vegetation change: A reunifying concept in plant ecology. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 7:69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Deyn, G. B., Raaijmakers, C. E., and Van der Putten, W. H. 2004. Plant community development is affected by nutrients and soil biota. Journal of Ecology 92:824–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. De Deyn, G. B., Raaijmakers, C. E., Zoomer, H. R., Ber, M. P., de Ruiter, P. C., Verhoef, H. A., Bezemer, T. M., and van der Putten, W. H. 2003. Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity. Nature 422:711–713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. del Moral, R., and Jones, C. C. 2002. Early spatial development of vegetation on pumice at Mount St. Helens. Plant Ecology 161:9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Densmore, R. V. 1992. Succession on an Alaskan tundra disturbance with and without assisted revegetation with grass. Arctic and Alpine Research 24:238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Densmore, R. V. 1994. Succession on regraded placer mine spoil in Alaska, USA, in relation to initial site characteristics. Arctic and Alpine Research 26:354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dobson, A. P., Bradshaw, A. D., and Baker, A. J. M. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277:515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Drake, D. R. 1998. Relationships among the seed rain, seed bank and vegetation of a Hawaiian forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Drury, W. H., and Nisbet, I. C. T. 1973. Succession. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 54:1147–1164.Google Scholar
  38. Fagan, W. F., and Bishop, J. G. 2000. Trophic interactions during primary succession: Herbivores slow a plant reinvasion at Mount St. Helens. The American Naturalist 155:238–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Flores-Martinez, A., Ezcurra, E., and Sanchez-Colon, S. 1994. Effect of Neobuxbaumia tetetzo on growth and fecundity of its nurse plant Mimosa luisana. Journal of Ecology 82:325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilbert, O. L., and Anderson, P. 1998. Habitat Creation and Repair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gleason, H. A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53:7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Glenn-Lewin, D. C., Peet, R. K., and Veblen, T. T. (eds.). 1992. Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Gunn, R. H., and Richardson, P. D. 1979. The nature and possible origins of soluble salts in deeply weathered landscapes in eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 17: 197–215.Google Scholar
  44. Hedin, L. O., Vitousek, P. M., and Matson, P. A. 2003. Nutrient losses over four million years of tropical forest development. Ecology 84:2231–2255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hobbs, R. J. 2005. The future of restoration ecology: Challenges and opportunities. Restoration Ecology 13:239–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hobbs, R. J., and Norton, D. A. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holl, K. D., Crone, E. E., and Schultz, C. B. 2003. Landscape restoration: Moving from generalities to methodologies. BioScience 53:491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holmgren, M., Scheffer, M., and Huston, M. A. 1997. The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 78:1966–1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Huston, M., and Smith, T. 1987. Plant succession: Life history and competition. The American Naturalist 130:168–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jordan, W. R., Gilpin, M. E., and Aber, J. D. 1987. Restoration Ecology: A SyntheticApproach to Ecological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Keever, C. 1950. Causes of succession on old fields of the piedmont, North Carolina. Ecological Monographs 20:230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Leroy, E. C., Hobbs, R. J., O'Connor, M. H., and Pate, J. S. 1999. Agriculture as a mimic of natural systems. Agroforestry Systems 45(Special Issue):1–446.Google Scholar
  54. Luken, J. O. 1990. Directing Ecological Succession. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Marquez, V. J., and Allen, E. B. 1996. Ineffectiveness of two annual legumes as nurse plants for establishment of Artemisia californica in coastal sage scrub. Restoration Ecology 4:42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGlone, M. 1996. When history matters: Scale, time climate and tree diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 5:309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McIntosh, R. P. 1985. The Background of Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. McIntosh, R. P. 1999. The succession of succession: A lexical chronology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 80:256–265.Google Scholar
  59. McVicar, T. R., Rui, L., Walker, J., Fitzpatrick, R. W., and Changming, L. (eds.). 2002. Regional Water and Soil Assessment for Managing Sustainable Agriculture in China and Australia. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
  60. Nordstrom, K. F., Lampe, R., and Vandemark, L. M. 2000. Reestablishing naturally functioning dunes on developed coasts. Environmental Management 25:37–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Odum, E. P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Palmer, M. A., Ambrose, R. F., and Poff, N. L. 1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pandey, A. N., and Singh, J. S. 1985. Mechanism of ecosystem recovery: A case study from Kumaun Himalaya. Recreation and Revegetation Research 3:271–292.Google Scholar
  64. Pärtel, M., Kalamees, R., Zobel, M., and Rosen, E. 1998. Restoration of species-rich limestone grassland communities from overgrown land: The importance of propagule availability. Ecological Engineering 10:275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pickett, S. T. A. 1989. Space-for-time substitutions as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Long-term Studies in Ecology. G. E. Likens (ed.). New York: Springer, pp. 110–135.Google Scholar
  66. Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. 1987. A hierarchical consideration of causes and mechanisms of succession. Vegetatio 69:109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Powell, E. A. 1992. Life history, reproductive biology, and conservation of the Mauna Kea silversword, Argyroxiphium sandwicense DC (Asteraceae), an endangered plant of Hawaii. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.Google Scholar
  68. Prach, K. 1994. Succession of woody species in derelict sites in central Europe. Ecological Engineering 3:49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ramensky, L. G. 1924. Basic regularities of vegetation covers and their study. (In Russian) Vestnik Opytnogo dêla Strende-Chernoz. Ob. Voronezh, 37–73.Google Scholar
  70. Reinhart, K. O., Greene, E., and Callaway, R. M. 2005. Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecography 28:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson, G. R., and Handel, S. N. 2000. Directing spatial patterns of recruitment during an experimental urban woodland reclamation. Ecological Applications 10:174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rui, L., Liu, G., Xie, Y., Qinke, Y., and Liang, Y. 2002. Ecosystem rehabilitation on the Loess Plateau. In: Regional Water and Soil Assessment for Managing Sustainable Agriculture in China and Australia. T. R. McVicar, L. Rui, J. Walker, R. W. Fitzpatrick, and L. Changming (eds.). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, pp. 358–365.Google Scholar
  73. Russell, J. S., and Isbell, R. F. (eds.). 1986. Australian Soils: The Human Impact. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  74. Samuels, C. L., and Drake, J. A. 1997. Divergent perspectives on community convergence. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sheley, R. L., and Krueger-Mangold, J. 2003. Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland. Weed Science 51:260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shiels, A. B., and Walker, L. R. 2003. Bird perches increase forest seeds on Puerto Rican landslides. Restoration Ecology 11:457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shugart, H. H., and West, D.C. 1980. Forest succession modeling. BioScience 30:308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sukopp, H. 2004. Human-caused impact on preserved vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 68:347–355.Google Scholar
  79. Sukopp, H., and Starfinger, U. 1999. Disturbance in urban ecosystems. In: Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. L. R. Walker (ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 397–412.Google Scholar
  80. Temperton, V. M., Hobbs, R. J., Nuttle, T., and Halle, S. (eds.). 2004. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  81. van Andel, J., and Aronson, J. (eds.). 2006. Restoration Ecology. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. van Diggelen, R. 2006. Landscape: Spatial interactions. In: Restoration Ecology. J. van Andel and J. Aronson (ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar
  83. Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society.Google Scholar
  84. Wali, M. K. (ed.). 1992. Ecosystem Rehabilitation. The Hague: SPB Academic Press.Google Scholar
  85. Walker, J., and Reuter, D. J. 1996. Indicators of Catchment Health: A Technical Perspective. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  86. Walker, J., Sharpe, P. J. H., Penridge, L. K., and Wu, H. 1989. Ecological field theory: The concept and field tests. Vegetatio 83:81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Walker, J., Thompson, C. H., Fergus, I. F., and Tunstall, B. R. 1981. Plant succession and soil development in coastal sand dunes of subtropical eastern Australia. In: Forest Succession, Concepts and Application. D. C. West, H. H. Shugart, and D. B. Botkin (eds.). New York: Springer, pp. 107–131.Google Scholar
  88. Walker, J., Thompson, C. H., Reddell, P., and Rapport, D. J. 2001. The importance of landscape age in influencing landscape health. Ecosystem Health 7:7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walker, L. R. 2005. Restoring soil and ecosystem processes. In: Forest Restoration in Landscapes: Beyond Planting Trees. S. Mansourian, D. Vallauri, and N. Dudley (eds.). New York: Springer, pp. 192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walker, L. R., and Chapin, F. S., III. 1987. Interactions among processes controlling successional change. Oikos 50:131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walker, L. R., and del Moral, R. 2003. Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Walker, L. R., Clarkson, B. D., Silvester, W. B., and Clarkson, B. R. 2003. Colonization dynamics and facilitative impacts of a nitrogen-fixing shrub in primary succession. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walker, L. R., Zarin, D. J., Fetcher, N., Myster, R. W., and Johnson, A. H. 1996. Ecosystem development and plant succession on landslides in the Caribbean. Biotropica 28:566–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walker, T. W., and Syers, J. K. 1976. The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wardle, D. A., Walker, L. R., and Bardgett, R. D. 2004. Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science 305:509–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Warming, E. 1895. Plantesamfund: Grunträk af den Ökologiska Plantegeografi. Copenhagen: Philipsen.Google Scholar
  97. Williams, B.G., Walker, J., and Tane, H. 2001. Drier landscapes and rising water tables: An ecohydrological paradox. Natural Resource Management 4:10–18.Google Scholar
  98. Wilson, S. D. 1999. Plant interactions during secondary succession. In: Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. L. R. Walker (ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 611–632.Google Scholar
  99. Young, T. P., Petersen, D. A., and Clary, J. J. 2005. The ecology of restoration: Historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters 8:662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zedler, J. B. 2005. Ecological restoration: Guidance from theory. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 3(2):31. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcont.cgi? article=1032/&context=jmie/sfewsGoogle Scholar
  101. Zedler, J. B., and Callaway, J. C. 2003. Adaptive restoration: A strategic approach for integrating research into restoration projects. In: Managing for Healthy Ecosystems. D. J. Rappaport, W. L. Lasley, D. E. Rolston, N. O. Nielsen, C. O. Qualset, and A. B. Damania (eds.). Boca Raton: Lewis, pp. 167–174.Google Scholar
  102. Zougmore, R., Zida, Z., and Kambou, N. F. 2003. Role of nutrient amendments in the success of half-moon soil and water conservation practice in semiarid Burkina Faso. Soil and Tillage Research 71:143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence R. R. Walker
  • Joe Walker
  • Roger del Moral

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations