Advertisement

Information systems effectiveness and organisational culture: an underlying model for ITEM evaluation

  • C. D. O’Mahony
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT)

Abstract

How to determine the effectiveness of an organisation’s information systems is the subject of continued debate in the IS community. Difficulties surround such issues as agreement on evaluation criteria, agreement on quantitative and qualitative methods, and the politicising of the evaluation process. In this paper, the author relates the nature of school information systems to mainstream information systems research. The literature surrounding Information Technology in Educational Management (ITEM) is reviewed, and an underlying model for school IS evaluation is presented. Using previous results as a basis, the author proposes a strategy for investigating the link between a school’ s culture and its IS emphases.

Keywords

Educational management administration evaluation/formative modelling 

References

  1. Barta, B.Z., Telem, M., Gev, Y. (Eds) (1995) Information technology in educational management. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  2. Bird, P. (1991) Computer assisted school administration in England. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 24 (1), 20–40.Google Scholar
  3. Bordow, A., More, E. (1991) Managing organisational communication. Longman, Sydney.Google Scholar
  4. Bunker, D.J., Dean, R.G., Edmundson, R.H. (1991) The management of the information systems function. ISOP 1991, Wollongong, 161–181.Google Scholar
  5. Dale, D., Habib, A (1991) Administrative computing in the Australian educational system. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24 (1), 120–145.Google Scholar
  6. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R. (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3 (1), 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunphy, D., Stace D. (1992) Under new management: Australian organisations in transition. McGraw-Hill, Sydney.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, E. (1991) Effectiveness measures for IS strategic planning. ISOP, Wollongong, 387–404.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, E.A. (1994) A management perspective on effective technology integration: top ten questions for school administrators. T H E Journal, 22 (4), 89–90.Google Scholar
  10. Fung, A.C.W. (1991) Computer assisted school administration in Hong Kong. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24 (1), 41–61.Google Scholar
  11. Galliers, R.D., Baker, B.S.H. (1995) An approach to business process re-engineering: the contribution of socio-technical and soft OR concepts. INFOR, 33 (4), 263–278.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, C., Nolan, R.L. (1974) Managing the four stages of EDP growth. Harvard Business Review, 52 (1), 76–88.Google Scholar
  13. Glatter, R. (1986) The management of school improvement, in Understanding school management, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, P.S., Pennings, J.M. (1977) New perspectives on organisational effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, san Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Goodsell, R. (1995) An investigation into timetabling in schools. Unpublished M. Comp. thesis, Macquarie University, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Handy, C., Aitken, R. (1986) Understanding schools as organisations. Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  17. Hirschheim, R., Earl, M., Feeny, D., Lockett, M. (1988) An exploration into the management of the information systems function: key issues and an evolutionary model, in Proceedings on the Joint International Symposium on Information Systems, Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschheim, R., Smithson, S. (1987) Information systems evaluation: myth and reality, in Information analysis: selected readings (ed. R.D. Galliers ), Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Jordan, E. (1994) Information strategy and organisation structure. Information Systems Journal, 4, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGrath, G.M., Dampney, C.N.G., More, E. (1995) MP/L1: an automated model of organisational power and its application as a conflict prediction aid in information systems strategy implementation, in The 11th conference on artificial intelligence for applications. IEEE Computer Society Press, California, 56–64.Google Scholar
  21. Mumford, E. (1994) New treatments or old remedies: is business process re-engineering really socio-technical design?. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 3 (4).Google Scholar
  22. Nolan, R.L. (1979) Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Business Review, 57 (2), 115–126.Google Scholar
  23. O’Mahony, C.D. (1995) Improving school information systems management: the quest for quality. Australian Catholic University, Sydney.Google Scholar
  24. O’Mahony, C.D., Dampney, C.N.G. (1995) Trends in the management of school information systems, in Proceedings: 6th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Curtin University, Perth, WA, 613–631.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, T.J., Waterman, R.H. (1982) In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Romm, T, Pliskin, N., Weber, Y. (1991) Identifying organisational culture clash in MIS implementations: when is it worth the effort?. Information Management, 21 (2), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sauer, C. (1993) Why information systems fail: a case study approach. Alfred Waller, Henley-on-ThamesGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, J., Hartley, B. (1983) Microcomputers for school management. Nepean C.A.E., Sydney.Google Scholar
  29. Telem, M. (1993) Information technology: a missing link in educational research. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26 (1), 123–142.Google Scholar
  30. Turney, C., Hatton, N., Laws, K., Sinclair, K., Smith, D. (1992) The school manager. Allen and Unwin, North Sydney.Google Scholar
  31. Visscher, A.J. (1991a) School administrative computing: a framework for analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24 (1), 1–19.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. Visscher, A.J. (199 lb) Computer assisted school administration and management: the state of the art in seven nations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education,24(1) 146–167.Google Scholar
  33. Visscher, A.J. (1995) A fundamental methodology for designing management information systems for schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (1), 231–249.Google Scholar
  34. Weill, P. (1991) The information technology payoff: implications for investment appraisal. Australian Accounting Review, 1(1), 2–11.Google Scholar
  35. Willcocks, L. (1994) Information management: the evaluation of information systems investments. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  36. Yetton, P., Southon, G. (1994) The impact of strategic conflict on Information technology: a case study of a public teaching hospital. Australian Graduate School of Management, Kensington, NSW.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. O’Mahony
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing and TechnologyAustralian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations