Advertisement

Evaluation strategy for ITEM quality

  • C. D. O’Mahony
  • P. Wild
  • I. D. Selwood
  • L. Kraidej
  • M. G. Reyes
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT)

Abstract

To produce a quality ITEM system, the essential process of evaluation must not be ignored. Within an existing framework, this paper discusses how we should evaluate ITEM systems and considers what objective and subjective measures are possible. Instruments are proposed for evaluating both individual school systems and systems used by groups of schools. The paper concludes with recommendations for future ITEM research.

Keywords

Educational management Evaluation Methodologies future developments 

References

  1. CCTA (1994) PRINCE project evaluation. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  2. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3 (1), 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald, E. (1993) Success measures for IS strategic planning. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2 (4), 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Henderson, R., Podd, J., Smith, M. and Varela-Alvarez, H. (1995) An examination of four user-based software evaluation methods. Interacting with Computers, 7 (4), 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hirschheim, R. and Smithson, S. (1987) Information systems evaluation: myth and reality, in Information Analysis: selected readings (ed. R.D. Galliers ). Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.Google Scholar
  6. O’Mahony, C.D. (1995) Improving school information systems management: the quest for quality. Australian Catholic University, Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. O’Mahony, C.D. & Dampney, C.N.G. (1995) Trends in the management of school information systems, in Proceedings: 6th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sept 1995, Curtin University, Perth, W. Australia.Google Scholar
  8. O’Mahony, C.D. (1996) IS effectiveness and organisational culture: an underlying model for fl’EM evaluation, in Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP International Working Conference on ITEM, July 1996, Hong Kong Bapist University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  9. Reyes, M.G. (1996) The impact of organisational culture on success of information projects, in Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP International Working Conference on ITEM, July 1996, Hong Kong Bapist University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  10. Richardson, S. (1987) Operationalising usability and acceptability: a methodological review, in New methods in applied ergonomics (eds. J.R. Wilson et al.), Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
  11. Rolstadas, A. (1995) Benchmarking: theory and practice. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  12. Sauer, C. (1993) Why information systems fail: a case study approach. Alfred Waller, Henley-on-Thames.Google Scholar
  13. Selwood, I.D. (1995) The development of ITEM in England and Wales, in (1995) Information technology in educational management (eds. B.Z. Barta et al.), Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  14. Visscher, A.J. (1991) Computer assisted school administration and management: the state of the art in seven nations.“ Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24 (1), 146–168.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Wild, P. & Fung, A.C.W. (1996) Evaluation of ITEM for proactive development, in Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP International Working Conference on ITEM, July 1996, Hong Kong Bapist University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  16. Wild, P., Scivier, J. and Richardson, S. (1992) An Evaluation of a LEA’s Secondary Schools IT system for LMS Support. Education Management and Administration, 20 (4), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Willcocks, L. (1994) Information management: the evaluation of information systems investments. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. O’Mahony
  • P. Wild
  • I. D. Selwood
  • L. Kraidej
  • M. G. Reyes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations