Advertisement

Abstract

Computer graphics based virtual reality techniques offer powerful and very valuable task visualization aids for planning system set-up and system processes, for previewing system and device actions, and even for seeing some invisible things in a complex action or production environment. Virtual reality techniques connected to CAD data banks can also offer 3-D simulation based programming and control tools for computer-controlled devices and can provide real-time interactive operator interface to those devices. Virtual reality techniques can also be applied to quick product prototyping by high-fidelity product modeling.

Keywords

Computer graphics Visualization Modeling operator interface computer programming and control. 

References

  1. Apostoli, R.S., Moran, D.D., Trombotto, G.D., Abate, F.J. (1993), A wholly designed and built flexible manufacturing cell (FMC) for training and research purposes. 12th Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineers; Brazilia, Brazil; pp. 1603–1606.Google Scholar
  2. Apostoli, R.S., Luciano, C.J. (1995), Manufacturing Simulation in a flexible system. 4th Symposium on Low Cost Automation; (IFAC-AADECA); Bs. As., Argentina; pp. 446–451.Google Scholar
  3. Bejczy, A.K., Kim, W.S., Venema, S. (1990), The phantom robot: predictive displays for teleoperation with time delay; Proc. IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  4. Bejczy, A.K., Kim, W.S. (1995), Sensor fusion in telerobotic task controls; Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  5. Fiorini, P., Bejczy, A.K., Schenker, P.S. (1993), Integrated interface for advanced teleoperation; IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 13, No. 5.Google Scholar
  6. Kalawski (1993), The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments; Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., U.K., 405 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Kim, W.S., Bejczy, A.K. (1991), Graphics displays for operator aid in telemanipulation; Proc. IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Systems, Man, an Cybernetics, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
  8. Kim, W.S. (1993), Graphical operator interface for space telerobotics; IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, W.S., Bejczy, A.K. (1993), Demonstration of a High Fidelity Predictive/Preview Display Technique for Telerobotic Servicing in Space; IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Special issue on space robotics (October).Google Scholar
  10. Moran, O.D., Rosales, A.G., Luciano, C.J. (1995), Real-time control of a tutorial flexible manufacturing cell; 4th Symposium of Low Cost Automation; (IFAC-AADECA); Bs. As. Argentina; pp. 311–315.Google Scholar
  11. Ogata, H., Tsuda, M., Mizukawa, M. (1996), Teaching 6-dot tasks for robot operating assembly in the same category; to appear in Proc. 8th Int’l. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Strommer, W., Neugebauer, J., Flaig, T. (1993), Transputer-based workstation as implemented for the example of industrial robot control; Proc. of Interface to Real and Virtual Words Conference, Montpellier, France; pp. 137–146.Google Scholar
  13. Takahashi, T., Ogata, H. (1992), Robotic assembly operation based on task-level teaching in virtual reality; Proc. IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation; pp. 1083–1088.Google Scholar
  14. Tso, S.K., Liu, K.P. (1995), Automatic generation of robot programming codes from perception of human demonstration; Proc. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems; pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
  15. Tung, C.P., Kak, A.C. (1995), Automatic learning of assembly tasks using a DataGlove system; Proc. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems; pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Bejczy
    • 1
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS198-219California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations