Simulation-Based Method Engineering in Federated Organizations

  • P. Peters
  • M. Mandelbaum
  • M. Jarke
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT)


The decentralization of organizations influences method engineering in two ways: Firstly, the distributed IS development process has to be supported by flexible, modular methods. Secondly, the interaction among methods and their users in the organizational network must be facilitated in order to ensure and improve process quality and efficiency. Our research starts from the observation that recent research in method engineering focusses on flexible, process-oriented integration of methods than on the organizational coupling of information flows between established methods that ensure high quality information exchange and continuous process improvement along feedback cycles. In order to show how organizational feedback cycles influence the efficiency and quality, we identified three kinds of information flows which can be categorized as task information, corporate memory and strategy information. Taking advantage of this categorization, we present a formal approach to method engineering in-the-large. This approach combines conceptual modeling of information flow models between federated methods and quantitative analysis of their short-term and long-term impacts on organizational performance by simulation. Technically, this is achieved by a two-fold application of meta modeling: firstly, to make short-term and long-term simulation techniques interoperate; and secondly, to link conceptual method models to the simulation models. These two links have been implemented in the MultiSim environment on top of the ConceptBase meta data manager. A case study that takes place in a setting of federated manufacturing methods shows how a change of methods influences the behavior of the overall company and how information flows along and across processes must be engineered to achieve a positive net outcome.


Information Quality Conceptual Modeling Simulation System Analysis 


  1. [Abdel-Hamid and Madnick, 1991]
    T. Abdel-Hamid and S. Madnick. Software Project Dynamics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. [Brodie and Ceri, 1992]
    M. Brodie and S. Ceri. On Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems: A workshop summary. Int. Jour. on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 1, 2 (1992), pp. 249–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [Daft and Lengel, 1986]
    R. Daft and R. Lengel. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science 32, 5 (1986), pp. 554 — 571.Google Scholar
  4. [Deiters et al., 1995]
    W. Deiters, V. Gruhn and R. Striemer. The FUNSOFT Approach to Business Process Management. Wirtschaftsinformatik 37, 5 (1995), pp. 459–466.Google Scholar
  5. [Feigenbaum, 1991]
    A. Feigenbaum. Total Quality Control. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
  6. [Fishwick, 1995]
    P. Fishwick. Simulation Model Design and Execution. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [Forrester, 1961]
    J. Forrester. Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1961.Google Scholar
  8. [Hammer, 1992]
    D. K. Hammer. Lean Information Management: The Integrating Power of Information. In H. J. Pels and J. C. Wortmann (Eds.), IFIP Transactions: Integration in Production Management Systems, pp. 147–163. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992.Google Scholar
  9. [Harmsen et al., 1994]
    F. Harmsen, S. Brinkkemper and H. Oei. Situational Method Engineering for Information System Project Approaches. In Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, pp. 169–194. Elsevier Science B.V., 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [Heinzl and Srikanth, 1995]
    A. Heinzl and R. Srikanth. Entwicklung der betrieblichen Informationsverarbeitung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 37, 1 (1995), pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
  11. [ISO, 1987]
    ISO. íS09000, Quality Systems - Model for Quality Assurance in design/development, production, installation, and servicing. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Jarke and Ellis, 1993] M. Jarke and C. Ellis. Distributed Cooperation in Integrated Information Systems. Int. Jour. of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2, 1 (1993), pp. 85 — 103.Google Scholar
  13. [Jarke et al., 1993]
    M. Jarke, M. Jeusfeld and P. Szczurko. Three Aspects of Intelligent Cooperation in the Quality Life Cycle. Int. Jour. of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2, 4 (1993), pp. 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Jarke et al., 1995]
    M. Jarke, R. Gallersdörfer, M. Jeusfeld, M. Staudt and S. Eherer. ConceptBase — A Deductive Object Base for Meta Data Management. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 4, 2 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [Klein and Lyytinen, 1992]
    H. Klein and K. Lyytinen. Towards a New Understanding of Data Modeling. In C. Floyd, H. Zullighoven, R. Budde and R. Keil-Slawik (Eds.), Software Development and Reality Construction, pp. 203–219. Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. [Lyytinen, 1987]
    K. Lyytinen. A Taxonomic Perspective on Information Systems Development: Theoretical Constructs and Recommendations. In R. Boland and R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, pp. 3–42. John Wiley and Sons, 1987.Google Scholar
  17. [Mandelbaum, 1995]
    M. Mandelbaum. Modellierung und Durchfürung von Informationsflussimulationen auf der Basis eines Simulationsrepositories. Master’s thesis, Lehrstuhl für Informatik V, RWTH Aachen, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. [Marttiin, 1994]
    P. Marttiin. Towards Flexible Process Support with a CASE shell. In G. Wijers, S. Brinkkemper and T. Wassermann (Eds.), Proc. of the 6th Mt. Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’94). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. [Oberweis et al., 1994]
    A. Oberweis, G. Scherrer and W. Stucky. INCOME/STAR: Methodology and Tools for the Development of Distributed Information Systems. Information Systems 19, 8 (1994), pp. 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [Olleet al., 1991]
    T. Olle, J. Hagelstein, I. MacDonald, C. Rolland, H. Sol, F. van Assche and A. Verrijn-Stuart. Information Systems Methodologies - A Framework for Understanding. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.Google Scholar
  21. [Österle, 1995]
    H. Österle. Prozess-und Systementwicklung (Band 1: Entwurfstechniken. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,…, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. [Paulk et al.,1993]
    M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Technical Report SEI-93-TR-24, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, February 1993.Google Scholar
  23. [Peters and Jeusfeld, 1994]
    P. Peters and M. Jeusfeld. Structuring Information Flow in Quality Management. In Int. Conf. on Data and Knowledge Systems for Manufacturing and Engineering, pp. 258–263, Hong Kong, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. [Peters et al.,1995]
    P. Peters, P. Szczurko, M. Jarke and M. Jeusfeld. A Federated Information System for Quality Management Processes. In IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems for Decentralized Organizations,pp. 100–117, Trondheim, Norway, 1995.Google Scholar
  25. [Peters, 1996]
    P. Peters. Planning and Analysis of Information Flow in Quality Management. PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen, 1996.Google Scholar
  26. [Pohl, 1994]
    K. Pohl. A Process Centered Requirements Engineering Environment. PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. [Scheer, 1993]
    A.-W. Scheer. Wirtschaftsinformatik (Reference Models for Industrial Business Processes (in German). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1993.Google Scholar
  28. [Scott-Morton, 1994]
    M. Scott-Morton. The 1990s research program: Implications for Management and the Emerging Organization. Decision Support Systems 12, 2 (1994), pp. 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [Senge, 1990]
    P. Senge. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Currency, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. [Shaw, 1991]
    N. Shaw. STEP Part 1 — overview and fundamental principles, ISO TC184/SC4/Editing Document No. N-11. Technical report, 1991.Google Scholar
  31. [Vennix et al., 1994]
    J. Vennix, D. Andersen, G. Richardson and J. Rohrbaugh. Model Building for Group decision Support: Issues and Alternatives fir Knowledge Elicitation. In J. Morecroft and J. Sterman (Eds.), Modeling for Learning Organizations. Productivity Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Peters
    • 1
  • M. Mandelbaum
    • 1
  • M. Jarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatik VRWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations