Abstract
The adoption of technological determinism or social constructivism (or a dialectical combination of the two) is considered to he problematic due to a lack of symmetry between organizational work and technology. Latour’s notion of quasi-objects is introduced to mitigate the limitations of an artificial distinction between object and subject worlds that results from the adoption of a dualistic approach. The idea of a mediated network of technology and organizational context is proposed, in which Information Technology implementations become black boxes as a result of dissemination through space and time. This process requires that allies be enrolled and controlled, which in turn indicates a need for the interests of relevant stakeholders (human and non-human) to be understood. The ideas of quasi-objects and mediated networks are applied to a case study of an automated access control system for a car park. The case study demonstrates the potential impact of (information) technology on organizational work through physical and informating changes in a pluralistic situation.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Ackoff, R. Redesigning the Future. New York: Wiley, 1974.
Beer, R. The Brain of the Firm, Second Edition. Colchester: Wiley, 1981.
Berger, P. L., and Luckman, T. The Social Construction of Reality. GardenCity, New York: Doubleday, 1966.
Boehm, B. “Software Engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Volume 25, Number 12, 1976, pp. 1226–1241.
Budde, R.; Kautz, K.; Kuhlenkamp, K.; and Züllighoven, H. Prototyping: An Approach to Evolutionary Systems Development. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1992.
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1979.
CCTA. SSADM Version 4 Reference Manual. Oxford: NCC Blackwell, 1990.
Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley, 1981.
Checkland, P. B. “From Framework through Experience to Learning: The Essential Nature of Action Research.” In H.-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (Editors), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (North Holland), 1991.
Checkland, P., and Casar, A. “Vickers’ Concept of an Appreciative System: A Systemic Account” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, Volume 13, 1986.
Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley, 1990.
Dahlbom, B., and Mathiassen, L. Computers in Context. Oxford: NCC Blackwell, 1993.
Eason, K Information Technology and Organisational Change. London: Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L. “Socio-technical Systems.” In F. E. Emery (Editor), Systems Thinking. New York: Penguin Books, 1969, pp. 281–296.
Flood, R., and Jackson, M. Creative Problem Solving, Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley, 1991.
Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
Gummesson, E. Qualitative Methods in Management Research. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur, 1988 (Chapter 4).
Habermas, J. Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann, 1972.
Hirschheim, R. A., and Klein, H. K. “Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development” Communications of the ACM, Volume 32, Number 10, 1989, pp. 1199–1216.
Knights, D., and Murray, F. Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management. Chichester: Wiley, 1994.
Latour, B. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Latour, B. We Have Never Been Modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
Law, J. “On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India.” In J. Law (Editor), Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph Number 32 (University of Keele). London: Routledge, 1986.
Lewis, P. Information Systems Development. London: Pitman, 1994.
Linstone, H. A. “Multiple Perspectives: Concept, Applications, and User Guidelines.” Systems Practice, Volume 2, Number 3, 1989, pp. 307–331
McMaster, T., and Vidgen, R. “Implementation Planning for Information Systems: Promoting the Transition with a Communication Strategy.” In J. Pries-Heje, P. Fowler, and K. Kautz (Editors), Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology. Proceedings of the first IFIP WG8.6 Conference, 14–17 October 1995, Oslo. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1995.
Mason, R. “Field Experimentation in MIS Research.” In I. Benbasat (Editor), The Information System Research Challenge: Experimental Research Methods, Volume 2. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Research Colloquium, 1989.
Markus, L. “Power, Politics and MIS Implementation.” Communications of the ACM Volume 26, Number 6, 1983, pp. (6): 430–444.
Maturana, H., and Varela, F. “Autopoiesis: The Organization of the Living.” In H. Maturana and F. Varela (Editors), Autopoiesis and Cognition. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1980.
Miles, R. “Combining ‘Soft’ and ‘Hard’ Systems Practice: Grafting or Embedding?” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, Volume 15, 1988, pp. 55–60.
Mitroff, I., and Linstone, H. The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Mumford, E., and Weir, M. Computer Systems in Work Design - The ETHICS Method. London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Munro, R. “Governing the New Province of Quality: Autonomy, Accounting and the Dissemination of Accountability.” In A. Wilkinson and H. Willmott (Editors), Making Quality Critical. London: Routledge, 1995.
Stowell, F., and West, D. Client-led Design. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
Susman, G. “Action Research: A Sociotechnical System Perspective.” In G. Morgan (Editor), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1983.
Vidgen, R. “Research in Progress: Using Stakeholder Analysis to Test Primary Task Conceptual Models in Information Systems Development.” Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Information System Methodologies. Edinburgh: BCS IS Methodologies Specialist Group, August 31 - September 2, 1994.
Walsham, G. Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley, 1993.
Willman, H. “Beyond Paradigmatic Closure in Organizational Enquiry.” In J. Hassard and D. Pym (Editors), the Theory and Philosophy of Organizations: Critical Issues and New Perspectives. London: Routledge, 1990.
Winograd, T., and Flores, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1986.
Wood, J. R. G.; Vidgen, R. T.; Wood-Harper, A. T.; and Rose, J. “Business Process Redesign: Radical Change or Reactionary Tinkering?” In J. Peppard (Editor), Examining Business Process Reengineering: Current Perspectives and Research Directions. Kogan Page., 1995.
Woolgar, S. “Rethinking Requirements Analysis: Some Implications of Recent Research into Producer-Consumer Relationships in it Development.” In M. Jirotka and J. Goguen (Editors), Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues. London: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 165–200.
Zmud, R. W.; Olson, M.; and Hauser, R. “Field Experimentation in MIS Research.” In I. Benbasat (Editor). The Information System Research Challenge: Experimental Research Methods, Volume 2. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Research Colloquium, 1989.
Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Oxford: Heinemann, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vidgen, R., McMaster, T. (1996). Boxes, Non-Human Stakeholders and the Translation of IT Through Mediation. In: Orlikowski, W.J., Walsham, G., Jones, M.R., Degross, J.I. (eds) Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34872-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34872-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-5041-2944-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34872-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive