Skip to main content

Completion Rules for Uncertainty Reasoning with the Description Logic ALC

  • Conference paper
Canadian Semantic Web

Part of the book series: Semantic Web and Beyond ((ADSW,volume 2))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Description Logics (DLs) are gaining more popularity as the foundation of ontology languages for the Semantic Web. On the other hand, uncertainty is a form of deficiency or imperfection commonly found in the real-world information/data. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in extending the expressive power of DLs to support uncertainty, for which a number of frameworks have been proposed. In this paper, we introduce an extension of DL (ALC) that unifies and/or generalizes a number of existing approaches for DLs with uncertainty. We first provide a classification of the components of existing frameworks for DLs with uncertainty in a generic way. Using this as a basis, we then discuss ways to extend these components with uncertainty, which includes the description language, the knowledge base, and the reasoning services. Detailed explanations and examples are included to describe the proposed completion rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF, eds (2003) The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bacchus F (1990) Representing and reasoning with probabilistic knowledge-a logical approach to probabilities, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giugno R, Lukasiewicz T (2002) P-SHOQ(D): A probabilistic extension of SHOQ(D) for probabilistic ontologies in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the European conference on logics in artificial intelligence, Cosenza, Italy, pp 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specificati ons. Knowledge acquisition 5(2): 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haarslev V, Pai HI, Shiri N (2005) A generic framework for description lo gics with uncertainty. In: Proceedings of uncertainty reasoning for the semantic web, Galway, Ireland, pp 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hölldobler S, Khang TD, Störr HP (2002) A fuzzy description logic with hedges as concept modifiers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on intelligent technologies, Science and Technics Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, pp 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roller D, Levy AY, Pfeffer A (1997) P-CLASSIC: A tractable probablistic description logic. In: Proceedings of the 14th national conference on artifi cial intelligence, AAAI Press, Providence, Rhode Island, pp 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lakshmanan LVS, Sadri F (1994) Probabilistic deductive databases. In: Proceedings of workshop on design and implementation of parallel logic programming systems, MIT Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 254–268.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lakshmanan LVS, Shiri N (2001a) Logic programming and deductive databases with uncertainty: A survey. Encyclopedia of computer science and technology, vol 45, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakshmanan LVS, Shiri N (2001b) A parametric approach to deductive databases with uncertainty. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 13(4):554–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Motro A, Smets P, eds. (1997) Uncertainty management in information systems-from needs to solutions, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parsons S (1996) Current approaches to handling imperfect information in data and knowledge bases. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 8(3):353–372.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross TJ, Booker JM, Parkinson WJ, eds (2002) Fuzzy logic and probability applications: bridging the gap, SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sánchez D, Tettamanzi, AGB (2004) Generalizing quantification in fuzzy description logics. In: Proceedings of the 8th Fuzzy Days, Springer-Verlag, Dortmund, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Straccia U (1998) A fuzzy description logic. In: Proceedings of the 15th national conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, USA, pp 594–599.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Straccia U (2001) Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of artificial intelligence research 14:137–166.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Tresp C, Molitor R (1998) A description logic for vague knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 13th European conference on artificial intelligence, John Wiley and Sons, Brighton, UK, pp 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8:338–353.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems l(l):3–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haarslev, V., Pai, HI., Shiri, N. (2006). Completion Rules for Uncertainty Reasoning with the Description Logic ALC . In: Koné, M.T., Lemire, D. (eds) Canadian Semantic Web. Semantic Web and Beyond, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34347-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34347-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29815-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34347-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics