Skip to main content

Incorporating Multiple Ontologies into the IEEE Learning Object Metadata Standard

  • Conference paper
Canadian Semantic Web

Part of the book series: Semantic Web and Beyond ((ADSW,volume 2))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

Learning objects are the currency for Educational Information Systems which support learning on the Educational Semantic Web. As such, proper metadata infrastructure must be set up around learning objects so that they are described in a way that agents can understand and also in a way that allows reuse. There are numerous problems with the LOM specification to date, but many research attempts advocate the use of various ontologies in alleviating some of the problems faced with the learning object metadata standards. However, there is a lack of practical examples describing exactly how these ontologies can be attached to a learning object. In light of this, our paper describes a practical approach that makes use of the IEEE LOM standard and which allows multiple ontologies to be included in the markup of learning objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5): 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, C., McCalla, G., and Winter, M. (2005). Flexible learning object metadata. 3rd International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (SW-EL 05) at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2005), July 18–22, 2005. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1–9. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gómez-Pérez, A., and Corcho, O. (2002). Ontology languages for the Se mantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(2): 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hendler, J. (2001). Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2):30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Instructional Management System Content Packaging Overview. (2005). Available online from: http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/cpv1p2pd/imscp_oviewv1p2pd.html.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kasai, T., Yamaguchi, H., Nagano, K., and Mizoguchi, R. (2005). A Semantic Web system for helping teachers plan lessons using ontology alignment. In Proc. Semantic Web for E-Learning Workshop at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 9–18. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knight, C., Gašević, D., and Richards, G. (2005). Ontologies for context-dependent reuse of learning designs and learning content. In Proc. Second Annual Lornet Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 15–18 November, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lama, M., Sanchez, E., Amorim, R.R., and Vila, X.A. (2005). Semantic description of the IMS Learning Design specification. In Proc. Semantic Web for E-Learning Workshop at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Learning Object Metadata Draft Standard. (2002). Available online from: http://ltsc.ieee.org/wgl2/files/LOM_1484_12_l_vl_Final_Draft.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lui, J., and Greer, J. (2004). Individualized selection of learning objects. In Proc. International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning at the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceios-Alagoas, Brazil, 30 August–3 September 2004. 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCalla, G. (2004). The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments: Purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004 (7). Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web. ISSN:1365-893X [online] Available from:< www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/7>.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mitrovich, A., and Devedžić, V. (2002). A model of Multitutor ontology-based learning environment. In Proc. ICCE Workshop on Concepts and Ontologies in Web-Based Educational Systems 3 December, 2002, Auckland, New Zealand. Edited by L. Aroyo, and D. Dicheva, 17–24. Eindhoven: Computer Science Reports 02/15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohan, P., and Brooks, C. (2003). Learning objects on the Semantic Web. In Proc. Inter national Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 7–14 July, 2003. Athens, Greece. 195–199. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson, M., Palmer, M., and Brase, J. (2003). The LOM RDF binding — principles and implementation. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Ariadne Conference, Belgium, 20–21 November 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. RELOAD Project. (2006). Available online from: http://www.reload.ac.uk/

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sicilia, M.A., García, E., Díaz, P., and Aedo, I. (2002). LEARNING LINKS: Reusable assets with support for vagueness and ontology-based typing. In Proc. ICCE Workshop on Concepts and Ontologies in Web-Based Educational Systems 3 December 2002, Auckland, New Zealand. Edited by L. Aroyo and D. Dicheva, 11–16. Eindhoven: Computer Science Reports 02/15.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verbert, K., Gašević, D., Jovanović, I, and Duval, E. (2005). Ontology-based learning content repurposing. In Proceedings of the 14th Inter national World Wide Web Conference, Chiba, Japan, 10–14 May, 2005. 1140–1141. Seattle, Washington: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, E., and Kim, Y.S. (2005). Ontological support for teaching strategy in intelligent visual reasoning tutor. In Proc. Semantic Web for E-Learning Workshop at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18 July, 2005, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 77–78. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zarraonandía, T., Dodero, J.M., Díaz, P., and Sarasa, A. (2004). Domain ontologies integration into the learning objects annotation process. In Proc. International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning at the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceíos-Alagoas, Brazil, 30 August–3 September 2004. 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohammed, P., Mohan, P. (2006). Incorporating Multiple Ontologies into the IEEE Learning Object Metadata Standard. In: Koné, M.T., Lemire, D. (eds) Canadian Semantic Web. Semantic Web and Beyond, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34347-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34347-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29815-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34347-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics