Skip to main content

Excavating Sites Unseen

The example of earthfast buildings in the colonial Chesapeake

  • Chapter
Between Dirt and Discussion

Abstract

In this chapter, two case studies from the colonial Chesapeake are presented to demonstrate the potential of low visibility archaeological sites toward the interpretation of historical landscapes. By comparing survey results against data recovery excavations, it is argued that low-density sites offer an important resource that need to be more effectively considered when engaging in inter- and intra-site spatial analyses, regional settlement patterning, and the determination of site significance as part of cultural resource surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archer, S. N., and Bartoy, K. M., 2000, Plants in the plowzone? Archaeology and paleoethnobotany at Carter’s Grove Site 10, Williamsburg, Virginia. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banning, E. B., 2002, Archaeological Survey, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, L. G., Menard, R. R., and Walsh, L. S., 1991, Robert Cole’s World: Agriculture & Society in Early Maryland, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C., Barka, N. F., Kelso, W. M., Stone, G. W., and Upton, D., 1981, Impermanent architecture in the southern American colonies, Winterthur Portfolio 16(2/3): 135–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., 1987, Harrington histograms versus Binford mean dates as a technique for establishing the occupational sequence of sites at Flowerdew Hundred, Virginia, American Archeology 6(1):62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., 1993, Flowerdew Hundred: The Archaeology of a Virginia Plantation, 1619–1864, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. C., and Brown, III, M. R., 1993, Seventeenth-century Chesapeake settlement patterns: A current perspective from Tidewater, Virginia, in: The Archaeology of 17 th-Century Virginia, T. R. Reinhart and D. J. Pogue, eds., Dietz Press, Richmond, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, L. E., 2001, Recovering Elements in Historical Archaeology: The Use of Soil Chemical Analysis for Overcoming the Effects of Post-Depositional Plowing, M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, R. W., 1978, The Homelot on the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake Tidewater Frontier, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History, University of Oregon, Eugene.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. A., and Miller, H. M., 1987, The view from the midden: An analysis of midden distribution and composition at the Van Sweringen Site, St. Mary’s City, Maryland, Hist. Archaeol. 21(2)37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. J., 2002, Discovering sites unseen, excavating unforseen sites: Survey, sampling, and significance in the inter-riverine uplands of Virginia, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 18(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostro, M., n.d., Archaeology at the Route 60/Penske Site: A Report on the 2001 Field Season, Colonial Williamsburg Archaeological Reports Series, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostro, M., 2000, Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Colonial Williamsburg Bus Facility, Colonial Williamsburg Archaeological Reports, Williamsburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostro, M., 2001, Phase II Archaeological Assessment of Sites 44JC1040 and 44JC1041 within the Proposed Colonial Williamsburg Bus Facility, Colonial Williamsburg Archaeological Reports, Williamsburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostro, M., 2003, The evolving plantation houselot in the late seventeenth century at Martin’s Hundred, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, W. S., 1994, Civil War material culture and camp life in central Kentucky: Archaeological investigations at Camp Nelson, in: Look to the Earth: Historical Archaeology and the American Civil War, C. R. Geier, Jr. and S. E. Winter, eds., University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodey, M. C., 1992, Phase II Archaeological Investigation of the Locus Grove Tract, Carter’s Grove Plantation, Colonial Williamsburg Archaeological Reports, Williamsburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, F. D., 1980, The “Manner House” before Stratford (Discovering the Clifts Plantation), Robert E. Lee Memorial Association, Stratford, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, F. D., 1990, An Evolutionary Approach to Archaeological Inference: Aspects of Architectural Variation in the 17 th-Century Chesapeake, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogue, D., 1988, Spatial analysis of the King’s Reach plantation homelot, ca. 1690–1715, Hist. Archaeol 22(2):40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M., 1987, Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., 2001, The archaeology of a “destroyed” site: Surface survey and historical documents at the Civilian Conservation Corps camp, Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico, Hist. Archaeol. 35(2): 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. W., 1982, Society, Housing, and Architecture in Early Maryland: John Lewger’s St. John’s, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of American Civilization, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K. A., and Kealhofer, L., 2004, Identifying activity areas in archaeological soils from a colonial Virginia house lot using phytolith analysis and soil chemistry, J. Archaeol. Sci. 31(12): 1659–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kostro, M. (2006). Excavating Sites Unseen. In: Archer, S.N., Bartoy, K.M. (eds) Between Dirt and Discussion. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34219-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics