Abstract
As Rund Koopmans has argued (1995) and as Carole Pateman (1970) argued in her theory classic of three decades ago, Participation and Democratic Theory, the actual face-to-face deliberation and debate that goes on in directly democratic groups may be the best way, maybe even the only way, to develop in people the capacity for democracy and self-governance. To date, we do not have a convincing, empirically based, answer to this question. Leach (2005) however, has recently found that, over the last quarter century, literally hundreds of thousands of people in the German social movement sector have been exposed to collectivist-democratic practices and a significant number of these people have come to expect consensus-based decision-making and collectivist-democratic practices in much of their community life. Are the sensibilities and capacities developed in these voluntary, social movement organizations in the modern Germany having a visibly democratizing effect on the nation as a whole? Could they, if these collectivist organizations were to spread in the United States or anywhere else in the world, be the path to reinvigorating democracy? These are important questions for examination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, P. and Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:61–89.
Bordt, R. (1997). The Structure of Women’s Nonprofit Organizations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Cornforth, C., Thomas, A., Lewis, J., and Spear, R. (1988). Developing Successful Worker’s Co-Operatives. London: Sage.
Cnaan, R.A. (1991). Neighborhood representing organizations: How democratic are they? Social Service Review, 65(4):614–634.
Everywoman. (1990). The Everywoman Directory of Women’s Co-Operatives and Other Enterprises. London: Everywoman.
Ferree, M. and Martin, P. (1995). Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women’s Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Gouldner, A. (1995). Metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 49:496–507.
Hacker, S. (1989). Pleasure, Power and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering and the Co-Operative Workplace. London: Unwin Hyman.
Iannello, K. (1992). Decisions Without Hierarchy: Feminist Interventions in Organizational Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Koopmans, R. (1995). Democracy from Below: New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Leach, D. (2005). The way is the goal: Collectivist democracy in German social movements. Dissertation in progress. Department of Sociology, University of Michigan.
Leach, D. K. (1998). Why just go for 51%?: Organizational structure in the religious society of friends. Working Paper, Center for Research on Social Organization, University of Michigan.
Leidner, R. (1991). Stretching the boundaries of liberalism: Democratic innovation in a feminist organization. SIGNS, 16:263–289.
Lichterman, P. (1996). The Search for Political Community: American Activists Reinventing Commitment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1973). Town meeting democracy. Working Papers for a New Society, 1:5–15.
Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic.
Matthews, N. (1994). Confronting Rape: The Feminist Anti-Rape Movement and the State. New York: Routledge.
Michels, R. (1962). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reinelt, C. (1994). Fostering empowerment, building community: The challenge for state-funded feminist organizations. Human Relations, 47:685–705.
Reinharz, S. (1983). Consulting to the alternative work setting: A suggested strategy for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology 11:199–212.
Rothschild, J. (2003). Situating the contemporary grassroots cooperatives: Intellectual and political origins. In: Community and the World: Participating in Social Change, ed. T. Dickinson, Huntington, NY: NOVA Science, pp. 253–279.
Rothschild, J. and Whitt, J. A. (1986). The Cooperative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rothschild-Whitt, J. (1979). The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review, 44:509–527.
Sirianni, C. (1996). Participatory Democracy and Empowerment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, F. (1911). Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Row.
Warren, M. (2001). Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society. Ed. G. Roth and C. Wittic, New York: Bedminster.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rothschild, J., Leach, D. (2008). Avoid, Talk, or Fight: Alternative Cultural Strategies in the Battle Against Oligarchy in Collectivist-Democratic Organizations. In: Cnaan, R.A., Milofsky, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32933-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32933-8_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-75729-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-32933-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)