Skip to main content

The Nature of Community Organizing: Social Capital and Community Leadership

  • Chapter
  • 2803 Accesses

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

People have always organized. They get together for mutual support, to help others, or to improve local services, either by developing their own provision or lobbying existing providers. People also get together to try and influence decisions that affect their neighbourhood or, as Hunter suggests in Chapter 1 of this Handbook, to mobilize against developments that threaten them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, J. (1996). Sharing the City: Community Participation In Urban Management. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alinsky, S. (1946). Reveille for Radicals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S.R. (1971). A ladder of participation in the USA. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, April, 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. J.G. Richardson, New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. and Taylor, M. (1998), Mutual Aid and Self-Help: Coping Strategies for Excluded Communities. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniglia, B. and Carmin, J. (2005). Scholarship on social movement organizations: Classic views and emerging trends. Mobilization, 10:201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M. and Smith, H. (2001). Civil society and new social movements. In: Urban Development and Civil Society: The Role of Communities in Sustainable Cities, ed. M. Carley, P. Jenkins, and H. Smith, London: Earthscan, pp. 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Renewal Unit (2005). Together We Can: People and Government Working Together to Make Life Better. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, J. and Healey, P. (2003). ‘My voice: My place’: Tracking transformations in urban governance. Urban Studies. 40:1979–1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. (2004). New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation, IDS Bulletin, 35(2):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G., Taylor, M., and Parkes, T. (2004). Protest or partnership? The voluntary and community sectors in the policy process. Social Policy and Administration, 38:221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M. (1989). The social environment. In: Making Connections: Reflecting on the Lives and Experiences of People with Learning Difficulties, ed. A. Brechin and J. Walmsley, London: Hodder and Stoughton, pp. 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. and Edwards, R. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19(2):141–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Brighton, UK: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (1998). Poverty, participation and social exclusion in North and South. IDS Bulletin, 29(1):50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (2005). Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformational possibilities. In Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation, ed. S. Hickey and G. Mohan, London: Zed, pp. 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, A. (2004). The Well-Connected Community. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittell, M. (2001). Empowerment Zones: An Opportunity Missed: A Six-City Comparative Study. New York: The Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Centre, The Graduate School and the University Centre of the City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glen, A. (1993). Methods and themes in community practice. In: Community and Public Policy, ed. H. Butcher, A. Glen, P. Henderson, and J. Smith, London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (2005). Social Capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, M.G. and Robinson, B. (1994). Strategies for Community Empowerment. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2005). Towards participation as transformation: Critical themes and challenges. In: Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation, ed. S. Hickey and G. Mohan, London: Zed, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) (2005). Lending a Hand: The Value of Light Touch Support in Empowering Communities. York, UK: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, J.P. and McKnight, J.L. (1993). Building Community from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilising a Community’s Assets. Evanston, IL: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. and Christie, I. (1999). To Our Mutual Advantage. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V. and Sullivan, H. (2004). Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: How well do local partnerships and public participation go together? Local Government Studies, 30(1):51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. and Rein, M. (1967), Dilemmas of Social Reform. New York: Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. (1997). Partnerships for regeneration and community development: Some opportunities, challenges and constraints. Critical Social Policy, 17:3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H. (1992). The bodies politic: Equity, diversity and community practice. In: Community and Public Policy, ed. H. Butcher, A. Glen, P. Henderson, and J. Smith, London: Pluto, pp. 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1988). Social movements and the democratization of everyday life. In: Civil Society and the State, ed. J. Keane, London: Verso, pp. 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milofsky, C. (1987). Neighbourhood-based organizations: A market analogy. In The Non-Profit Sector: A Research Handbook, ed. W.W. Powell, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milofsky, C. and Hunter, A. (1994). Where non-profits come from: A theory of organizational emergence. Paper presented to the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations ands Voluntary Action, San Francisco, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison, J. (2000) Government-voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality and civil society. Journal of Law and Society. 27(1):98–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. and Cunningham, J. (2003). Organizing for Community Controlled Development: Renewing Civil Society. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODPM (2005). Making Connections: An Evaluation of the Community Participation Programmes. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1987). Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics: Social movements since the 1970s. In: Changing Boundaries of the Political, ed. C.S. Maier, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcoff, W. (1997). Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Redefining community development: Part I: New partnerships. Shelterforce Online. Retrieved October 4, 2005 from: http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/96/ccis.Html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcoff, W. (1998). Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Redefining community development, Part II: Collaborating for change. Shelterforce Online. Retrieved October 4, 2005 from: http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/96/ccis.Html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies, 38:2211–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam. R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25:327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43:172–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (2000). Collaborative self-help community development: When is the strategy warranted? Journal of Community Practice, 7(2), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. with Tropman, J. (1987). Models of community organizations and macro practice perspectives: Their mixing and phasing (3–25). In: Strategies of Community Organization, ed. F. Cox, J. Erlich, J. Rothman, and J. Tropman, Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirlow, P. and Murtagh, B. (2004). Capacity-building, representation and intracommunity conflict. Urban Studies, 41(1):57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C., McCabe, A., Lowndes, V, and Nanton, P. (1996) Community Networks in Urban Regeneration: ‘It All Depends Who You Know!’ Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, K. (2003). Democracy in Action: Community Organizing and Urban Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) (2000). A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: A Framework for Consultation. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, C. (1994). Social Work, Community Work and Psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2003). Public Policy in the Community. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1983). The Making of Community Work, London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1945). Democracy in America, two volumes. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. (1994). The Guide to Effective Participation. Brighton, UK: Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, A. and Syme, S. (1999). The social environment and health: A discussion of the epidemiological literature. Annual Review of Public Health, 20:287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, M. (2008). The Nature of Community Organizing: Social Capital and Community Leadership. In: Cnaan, R.A., Milofsky, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32933-8_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics