Skip to main content

Describing the Community in Thorough Detail

  • Chapter
  • 2738 Accesses

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Community study as a method focuses holistically on how people think and act in their every-day lives, in their natural settings. An inductive process is used to learn the meanings attached to things in their lives. If a community is selected carefully it can serve as a representative cultural or societal sample. For a community study the researcher is the research instrument who typically becomes immersed in the place, even for a short while. The researcher inter-acts with people, shares daily life, and participates in community experiences with at least some of the inhabitants. In this process, termed participant observation, data are collected systematically and unobtrusively (Taylor and Bogdan, 1998). Being an observer has moral and ethical problems, and communities are not likely to agree with all or some of what is found [c.f., famous example of (1968)]. A community study can provide vivid rich detail that uniquely in social science research makes a place come alive, due to the field immersion of the researcher. A typical criticism is that a researcher produces a sympathetic portrait of a place, due to a lack of detachment (Bell and Newby, 1972). The aim is to describe the uniqueness of a community studied but simultaneously show that it is representative of a problem or phenomena in, and theory about, the wider society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arensberg, C. (1961). The community as object and as sample. American Anthropologist, 65:241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E.C. (1958). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, P. (1990). Qualitative methods in rural studies: Basic principles. The Rural Sociologist, 10(2):3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M. P. (1988). The Moral Order of the Suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. and Newby, H. (1972). Community Studies: An Introduction to the Sociology of the Local Community. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (1994). Childerley: Nature and Morality in a Country Village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. J.G. Richardson, Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, J.A. (1993). Service Clubs in American Society: Rotary, Kiwanis, and Lions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.W. and Wolf, E.R. (1974). The Hidden Frontier: Ecology and Ethnicity in an Alpine Valley. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1957). Community Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990). Social capital. In: Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 300–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J.F. (1997). From Duty to Desire: Remaking Families in a Spanish Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1989). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (3d edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, CM. (1999). Worlds Apart: Why Poverty Exists in Rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, K.C. and Stull, D.D. (1998). Doing Team Ethnography: Warnings and Advice. Qualitative Research Methods Series, 42. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K.T. (1976). Everything in Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J.W. (1990). Enclosures, boundary maintenance and its representations over time in Asturian mountain villages (Spain). In: Culture Through Time: Anthropological Approaches, ed. E. Ohnuki-Tierney, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 94–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitchen, J.M. (1990). How do you know what to ask if you haven’t listened first? Using anthropological methods to prepare for survey research. The Rural Sociologist, 10(2):15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C.B., Flora, J.L., with Fey, S. (2003). Rural Communities: Legacy and Change (2d edn.). Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, J.L., Sharp, J., and Flora, C. (1997). Entrepreneurial social infrastructure and locally initiated economic development in the nonmetropolitan United States. Sociological Quarterly, 38:623–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H.J. (1962). The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1965). The Levittowners: Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, G. (1975). Catholics and Protestants. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, W. (1978). As You Sow (2d edn.). Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78:1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, E.J. (1979) Biography of a Small Town. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, D., Higdon, F.X., and Martin, K.E. (2001). Reevaluating community power structures in modern communities. Journal of the Community Development Society, 32:251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefalas, M. (2003). Working-Class Heroes: Protecting Home, Community, and Nation in a Chicago Neighborhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the Politics of Place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, D. (1995). The Good City and the Good Life: Renewing the Sense of Community. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1965). La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty — San Juan and New York. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.R. and Molotch, H.L. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24:315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. and Ulmer, M.J. (1970) [1946]. Small business and civic welfare. In: The Structure of Community Power, ed. M. Aiken and P.E. Mott, New York: Random House, pp. 124–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1990). Introduction: The historicization of anthropology. In: Culture Through Time: Anthropological Approaches, ed. E. Ohnuki-Tierney, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R. (1999). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons and Other Hangouts at the Heart of Community (3d edn.). New York: Marlowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2d edn.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. and Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 26:18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993a). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993b). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13:35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. (1990). Farming and community from the anthropological study of families. The Rural Sociologist, 10(2):23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. (1992). Prairie Patrimony: Family, Farm and Community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. (2003). Newcomers to Old Towns: Suburbanization of the Heartland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. and K. Davis-Brown (1990). Rural communities in transition. Proceedings of the W.K. Kellogg National Rural Studies Committee., ed. E. Castle and B. Baldwin, Western Rural Development Center, Oregon State University, pp. 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S., Farnsworth, R.G., and Rendziak, J. (1998). Is locally led conservation planning working? A farm town case study. Rural Sociology, 63:214–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. (1987). Beyond Conformity or Rebellion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J.S., Flora, J.L., and Killacky, J. (2003). Networks and fields: Corporate business leader involvement in voluntary organizations of a large nonmetropolitan city. Journal of the Community Development Society, 34(1):36–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smock, K. (2003). Democracy in Action: Community Organizing and Urban Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.J. and Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Slyck, A.A. (1995). Free to All: Carnegie Libraries and American Culture, 1890–1920. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidich, A. and Bensman, J. (1968). Small Town in Mass Society (rev. edn.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R.L. (1965). Studying Your Community. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1988). Upscaling Downtown: Stalled Gentrification in Washington, D.C. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose Connections: Joining Together in America’s Fragmented Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salamon, S. (2008). Describing the Community in Thorough Detail. In: Cnaan, R.A., Milofsky, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32933-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics