Abstract
Natural disasters, unintended disasters (largely industrial and technological), and deliberate disasters have all increased in number and intensity in the United States in the last quarter century2(see Figure 32.1) In the United States we may prevent some and mitigate some, but we can’t escape them. At present, we focus on protecting the targets and mitigating the consequences, and we should do our best at that. But our organizations are simply not up to the challenge from the increasing number of disasters. What we can more profitably do is reduce the size of the targets, that is, reduce the concentrations of energy found in hazardous materials, the concentration of power in vital organizations, and the concentrations of humans in risky locations. Smaller, dispersed targets of nature’s wrath, industrial accidents, or terrorist’s aim will kill fewer and cause less economic and social disruption.
I am grateful for support from a National Science Foundation Small Grant award, SES-0329546.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Lazerson, M., & Lorenzoni, G. (1999). The networks that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8, 235–266.
Tierney, K.J. (2003). Disaster beliefs and institutional interests: Recycling disaster myths in the aftermath of 9–11. In L. Clarke (Ed.), Terrorism and disaster: New threats, new ideas: Research in social problems and public policy (pp. 33–51). New York, Elsevier.
Ashford, N.A. (1993). The encouragement of technological change for preventing chemical accidents: Moving from secondary prevention and mitigation to primary prevention. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development.
Lazerson, M. (1988). Organizational growth of small firms: An outcome of markets and hierarchies? American Sociological Review 53, 330–342.
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Amin, A. (2000). Industrial districts. In E. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 149–168). Oxford: Blackwell.
Harrison, B. (1994). Lean and mean: The changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. New York: Basic Books.
Lieberman, M.B. (1987). Market growth, economies of scale, and plant size in the chemical processing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, 175–191.
Meyer, M.W., & Zucker, L.G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Piore, M., & Sable, C. (1984). The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.
McLean, B., & Elkind P. (2003). The smartest guys in the room; The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron. New York: Penguin Group.
Wald, M. (2005). Experts assess deregulation as factor in ’03 blackout. The New York Times, September 16, 2005, A5, 20.
Purvis, M., & Bauler, J. (2004). Irresponsible care: The failure of the chemical industry to protect the public from chemical accidents. New York: United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.
Flynn, S. (2004). America the vulnerable : How our government is failing to protect us from terrorism. New York: HarperCollins.
Grant, D., & Jones, A.W. (2003). Are subsidiaries more prone to pollute? New evidence from the EPA’s Toxics Release Inventory. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (March), 162–171.
Perrow, C. (1992). Small firm networks: Networks and organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Grant, D., Jones, A.W., &. Bergesen, A.J. (2002). Organizational size and pollution: The case of the U.S. chemical industry. American Sociological Review, 67 (June), 389–407.
Kleindorfer, P.R., Belke, J.C., Elliott, M.R., Lee, K., Lowe R.A., & Feldman, H.I. (2003). Accident epidemiology and the U.S. chemical industry: Accident history and worst-case data from risk management program info. Risk Analysis, 23, 865–881.
Clarke, L. (2005). Worst cases: Terror and catastrophe in the popular imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Powell, W.W. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152, 197–215.
Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional advantage culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (pp. xi, 226 pp). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clarke, L. (2002). Panic: Myth or reality? Contexts, 1(3), 21–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perrow, C. (2007). Disasters Ever More? Reducing U.S. Vulnerabilities. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_32
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73952-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-32353-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)