Skip to main content

Organizational Adaptation to Disaster

  • Chapter
Handbook of Disaster Research

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The major focus of this chapter is twofold. We first consider what has been learned about organizational adaptation to disasters from original field studies by the Disaster Research Center (DRC) during the initial 20 years of its existence (1963–1983). We then examine a series of secondary data analyses (1982–2001) that we, along with our graduate and undergraduate students, completed using data archives produced primarily from these studies and maintained by the DRC. The groundwork established by what amounts to several decades of original field studies and follow-up archival analyses has continued to inform DRC field research on preparedness for and response to natural, technological, and willful disasters by organizations in both the public (e.g., Tierney, 1985, 1993) and private sectors (e.g., Webb, Tierney, & Dahlhammer, 2000). Arguably the most compelling example of continuity from the earliest to the most recent work within the DRC tradition is the Center’s major study of organizational adaptation following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center (Kendra & Wachtendorf, 2003; Kendra et al., 2003; Wachtendorf, 2004).

Organized responses which may range from small emergent work groups to large, complex, and bureaucratic organizations are not only the primary agencies through which communities respond to disasters, they also provide the shaping contexts for most individual responses. (Kreps, 1978, p. 67)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

 

  • Bosworth, S.L., & Kreps, G. A. (1986). Structure as process: Organization and role. American Sociological Review, 51, 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (1996). Disaster evacuation behaviorTourists and other transients. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (1994). Disaster archives and structural analysis: Uses and limitations. In R.R. Dynes & K.J. Tierney (Eds.), Disaster, collective behavior, and social organization (pp. 45–71). Newark, Toronto, and London: University of Delaware and Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1970). Organized behavior in disaster. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.H. (1962). Intraorganizational structural variation: Application of the bureaucratic model. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (1998). Disaster as systemic event and social catalyst: A clarification of subject matter. In E.L. Quarantelli, (Ed.), What is a disaster: Perspectives on the question (pp. 31–55). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, D.E. (1978). Community response to disaster: Functional and structural alternations. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and research (pp. 18–47). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonca, D., & Wallace, W.A. (2002). Development of a decision logic to support improvisation: An application to emergency response. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS-35, 220b-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1991). The evolution of organizational theory. In Miller, G. (Ed.), Studies in organizational sociology (pp. 53–69). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, D.E. (1990). Volunteer and organizational search and rescue activities following the Loma Prieta Earthquake: An integrated emergency and sociological analysis. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1996d). The future is not the past repeated: Projecting disasters in the 21st century from current trends. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4, 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (2001). Disasters, sociology of. In N. Smelser & P. Bates (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (vol. 6, pp. 3719–2721). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (1985). Disaster and the social order. Sociological Theory, 3, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L., & Dynes, R.R. (1970). Special issue: Organizational and groups behavior in disasters. American Behavioral Scientist, 13, 323–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, C.K. (1981). Levels in the study of social structure. In P.M. Blau & R.K. Merton (Eds.), Continuities in structural inquiry. (pp. 179–190). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noon, J.M. (2001). Revisiting key issues about collective behavior, organizing, and role enactment. Sociological Spectrum, 21, 479–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.F. (1991). Coordinating community resources. In T.E. Drabek & G.J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 55–78). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P.J., & Williams, W. (1986). Disaster policy implementation: Managing programs under shared governance. New York and London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylves, R.T. (1991). Adopting integrated emergency management in the United States: Political and organizational challenges. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9, 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J. (1985). Emergency medical preparedness and response in disasters: The need for interorganizational coordination. Public Administration Review, 45, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, T.R. (1973). Needs and group emergence: Developing a welfare response. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, F., & Harvey, C.C. (1975). The structure of social systems. New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S., Hodgson, M., & Dow, K. (2001). Subsidized inequities: The spatial patterning of environmental risks and federally assisted housing. Urban Geography, 22(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L., & Dynes, R. (1989). Reconstruction in the context of recovery: thoughts on the Alaskan earthquake. Paper presented at the Conference on Reconstruction after Urban Earthquakes, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Buffalo, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.H. (1964). Collective behavior. In R.E.L. Faris (Ed.), Handbook of Sociology (pp. 382–425). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R., DeMarchi, B., & Pelanda, C. (Eds.). (1987). Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A., Ed. (1989c). Social structure and disaster. Newark, London, and Toronto: University of Delaware and Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J., Wachtendorf, T., & Quarantelli, E. (2003). The evacuation of lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11: An unplanned success. Joint Commission of Quality and Safety, 29, 316–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R, Quarantelli, E.L., & Kreps, G.A. (1972). A perspective on disaster planning. Columbus, OH: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P., Kartez, J., & Wenger, D. (1993). Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation, and equity. Disasters, 17, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, J.M., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1973). Neglected characteristics of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 665–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, W.L., Jr. (1988). Current policy and implementation issues in disaster preparedness. In L. K. Comfort (Ed.), Managing disaster: Strategies and policy perspectives (pp.111–125). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003c). Creativity in emergency response to the World Trade Center disaster. In Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Public Entity Risk Institute, and Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems (Eds.), Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research, No. 39 (pp. 121–146). Special Publication. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., & Haas, J.E. (1969). Laboratory simulation of organizational stress. American Sociological Review, 34, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., Mushkatel, A., & Kilijanek, T.S. (1983). Earthquake mitigation policy: The experience of two states. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R. (1987). The concept of role in disaster research. In R.R. Dynes, B. De Marche, & C. Pelanda (Eds.), Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research (pp. 71–103). Milano, Italy: Franco Angelo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A., & Bosworth, S.L. (1993). Disaster, organizing, and role enactment: A structural approach. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 428–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T.A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (1978). The organization of disaster response: Some fundamental theoretical issues. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and research (pp. 65–87). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auf der Heide, E. (1989a). Disaster response: Principles of preparation and coordination. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, D.E. (1987). Collective behavior and disaster research. In R. R. Dynes, B. De Marche, & C. Pelanda (Eds.), Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research (pp. 213–239). Milano, Italy: Franco Angelo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Community innovation in hazardous materials management: Profess in implementing SARA Title III in the United States. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 88, 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonca, D., & Wallace, W.A. (2004). Studying organizationally situated improvisations in response to extreme events. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22, 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W.H. (1983). Organizations as action generators. American Sociological Review, 48, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A. (1978). The structural patterns of four types of organizations in disaster. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and research (pp. 87–103). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L., & Dynes, R.R. (1977). Response to social crisis and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A.H. (1969). Communities in disasters: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D., Drabek, T., & Haas, J. (1975). Human systems in extreme environments, Monograph 21. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1981). Evolutionary theory as a backdrop for administrative practice. In H. D. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the human services: Cross disciplinary reflections (pp. 107–141). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., Tamminga, H.L., Kilijanek, T.S., & Adams, C.R. (1981). Managing multiorganizational emergency responses: Emergent search and rescue networks in natural disasters and remote area settings. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R.R., Quarantelli, E.L., & Wenger, D. (1990). Individual and organizational response to the 1985 earthquake in Mexico City, Mexico. Newark, DE: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, Book and Monograph Series No. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A. (1998). Disaster and the theory of social order. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster: Perspectives on the question (pp. 127–145). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., & Haas, J.E. (1974). Understanding complex organizations. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, S.L., & Kreps, G.A. (1987). The life history of the emergent organization in times of disaster. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G.A. (1981). The worth of the NAS-NRC and DRC studies of individual and social responses to disasters. In J.D. Wright & P. Rossi (Eds.), Social science and natural hazards (pp. 91–122). Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.F., & Streeter, C.L. (1987). Conceptualizing and measuring disaster preparedness. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5, 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.F., Colignon, R.A., Banerjee, M.M., Murty, S.A., & Rogge, M. (1993). Partnerships for community preparedness. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kreps, G.A., Bosworth, S.L. (2007). Organizational Adaptation to Disaster. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics