Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-Guided Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
MIS Techniques in Orthopedics

Abstract

Computed-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) has been recently defined as the ability to use sophisticated computer algorithms to allow the surgeon to determine three-dimensional placement of total hip implants in situ.1 A rapid ongoing evolution of technical advances have allowed the ability to move from cumbersome systems requiring a preoperative computed tomography of the patient’s hip joint to more elegant systems that use image-free registration or the simple use of fluoroscopy at the time of surgery. In total hip replacement, several reports have cited the accuracy with which implants can be placed using computer-aided robotic devices or surgical navigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 319.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knolte LP, Langlotz F. Basics of Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS). In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigations and Robotics in Total Joint and Spinal Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Bomer M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using ROBODOC. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:82–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bargar WL. Robotic surgery and current development with the ROBODOC system. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG. Navigations and Robotics in Total Joint and Spinal Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weise M, Schmidt K, Willburger RE. Clinical experience with CT-based Vectorvision system. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG. Navigations and Robotics in Total Joint and Spinal Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hagena FW, Kettrukat M, Christ RM, Hackbart M. Fluoroscopy-based navigation in Genesis II total knee arthroplasty with the Medtronic “Viking” system. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG. Navigations and Robotics in Total Joint and Spinal Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giurea A, Zehetgruber H, Funovics P, Grampp S, Karamat L, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Risk factors for dislocation in cementless hip arthroplasty—a statistical analysis. Z Orthop. 2001;139:194–199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear and component migration. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:530–534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bader RJ, Steinhauser E, Willmann G, Gradinger R. the effects of implant position, design, and wear on the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Hip International. 2001;11:80–90.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmermann JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60:217–221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrack RL, Lavernia C, Ries M, Thornberry R, Tozakoglou E. Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Clinics NA. 2001; 32:569–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop. Res. 1998;16:513–517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1990;159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  13. DiGioia AM, Jamaraz B, Blackwell M, et al. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:8–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Gioia AM, Jamaraz B, Nikou C, LaBarca RS, Moody JE, Colgan S. Surgical Navigation for total hip replacement with the use of HipNav. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2000;10:3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haaker R, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Stiehl JB, Rubenthaler F, Shockheim M. Comparison of Freehand Versus Computer Assisted Acetabular Cup Implantation. J Bone and Joint Surg. B Submitted; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Bourquin Y, Nolte LP. Fluoroscopy based surgical navigation. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, eds. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.; 1997:956–960.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte LP. Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4:65–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hassan DM, Johnston GHF, Dust WNC, Watson G, Dolovich AT. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:80–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M. Computerassistierte navigierte Pfannenplatzierung in der Hüftendoprosthetik—Anwenderstudie im klinischen Routinealltag. Z Orthop. 2000;138:515–521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M. Computerassistierte navigierte Platzierung von verschiedenen Pfannentypen in der Hüftendoprosthetik—eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie. Z Orthop. 2001;139:512–517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jarmaz B, DiGioia AM, Blackwell M, Nikou C. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Jlin Orthop. 1998; 354:70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jolles BM, Genoud P. Accuracy of computer-assisted placement in total hip arthroplasty. International Congress Series. 2001;1230:314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leenders T, Vandervelde D, Nahiew G, Nuyts R. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computed assisted surgery: Prospective and randomized study. Computer Aided Surgery. 2002;7:99–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1992;276:206–209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1993;75B:228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1986;68B:409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thoren B, Sahlstedt B. Influence of pelvic position on radiographic measurements of the prosthetic acetabular component. Acta Radiol. 1990;31:133–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G. Comparison of two-and three-dimensional methods for assessment of orientation of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol. 1998;29:357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fontes D, Benoit J, Lortat-Jacob A, Didry R. Luxation of total hip endoprosthesis. Statistical validation of a modelization of 52 cases. Rev Chir Orthop. 1991;77:163–170.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:359–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53212, USA

    James B. Stiehl MD (Associate Clinical Professor)

Authors
  1. James B. Stiehl MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stiehl, J.B. (2006). Computer-Guided Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: MIS Techniques in Orthopedics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29300-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29300-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24210-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29300-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation