Skip to main content

Intercrop Mixtures When Individual Crop Responses Are Not Available

  • Chapter
Statistical Design and Analysis for Intercropping Experiments

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Statistics ((SSS))

  • 430 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, statistical designs and analyses were presented for mixtures of n of m cultivars when the individual crop responses were available. In this chapter, statistical procedures are given for mixtures of n of m cultivars when there is a single response for the mixture. The methods presented here represent a generalization of those in Chapter 7 of Volume I. The general topic of this chapter has been considered by Federer and Raghavarao (1987), where they develop some of the required theoretical results. Their minimal designs are for m items taken t + 1 at a time, where t is the order of specific mixing effect being considered; a t th-order effect involves t +1 of the m items. The number of cultivars must exceed 2t + 1. They present solutions for general mixing ability effects, for bi-specific mixing ability effects, and for t = 2 or tri-specific mixing ability effects. Their definition of general combining ability (GMA) is denoted as cultivar effect in the following. The definition of GMA used herein removes the sole crop effect from the cultivar effect. As in the previous chapter, their notation will be followed in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Balaam, L.N. (1986). Intercropping—past and present. In Statistical Design. Theory and Practice, Proceedings of Conference in Honor of Walter T. Federer (Editors: C. E. McCulloch, S. J. Schwager, G. Casella, and S. R. Searle), Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bush, K. A., W. T. Federer, H. Pesotan, and D. Raghavarao (1984). New combinatorial designs and their application to group testing. J. Statist. Plan. Inference 10, 335–343.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Denes, J. and A. D. Keedwell (1974). Latin Squares and Their Applications. Halstead Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Federer, W. T. (1967). Experimental Design-Theory and Application. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., Bombay. (First published by Macmillan, 1955.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federer, W. T. (1979). Statistical design and analysis for mixtures of cultivars. Agron. J. 71, 701–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Federer, W. T. (1991). Statistics and Society—Data Collection and Interpretation. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Federer, W. T. (1995). A simple procedure for constructing experiment designs with incomplete blocks of sizes 2 and 3. Biometr. J. 37, 899–907.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Federer, W. T. and K. E. Basford (1991). Competing effects designs and models for two-dimensional layouts. Biometrics 47, 1461–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Federer, W. T., A. Hedayat, C. C. Lowe, and D. Raghavarao (1976). Application of statistical design theory to crop estimation with special reference to legumes and mixtures of cultivars. Agron. J. 68, 914–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Federer, W. T. and D. Raghavarao (1987). Response models and minimal designs for mixtures of n of m items useful for intercropping and other investigations. Biometrika 74, 571–577.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, R. A. and F. Yates (1938). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. Oliver and Boyd Ltd, Edinburgh (5fh edn. 1957.)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall, D. A. (1976). Mixing design: A general model, simplifications, and some minimal designs. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hedayat, A. and W. T. Federer (1970). On the equivalence of Mann’s group automorphism method of constructing 0(n, n-1) set and Raktoe’s collineation method of constructing a balanced set of l-restrictional prime-powered lattice designs. Ann. Math. Statist. 41, 1530–1540.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hedayat, A. and W. T. Federer (1974). Pairwise and variance balanced incomplete block designs. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 26, 331–338.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedayat, A. and W. T. Federer (1984). Orthogonal F-rectangles for all even n. Calcutta Statist. Assoc. Bull. 33, 85–92.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen, N. F. and W. T. Federer (1965). Competing ability in wheat. Crop Sci. 5, 449–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khare, M. and W. T. Federer (1981). A simple construction procedure for resolvable incomplete block designs for any number of treatments. Biometr. J. 23, 121–132.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, K. J. (1980). A partition of a two-factor interaction, with an agricultural example. Appl. Statist. 29, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raghavarao, D. (1971). Constructions and Combinatorial Problems in Design of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Raghavarao, D. and W. T. Federer (1979). Block total response as an alternative to the randomized response method in surveys. J. Roy. Statist. Soc, Series B 41, 40–45.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Raghavarao, D., W. T. Federer, and S. J. Schwager (1986). Characteristics distinguishing among balanced incomplete block designs with respect to repeated blocks. J. Statist. Plan. Inference 13, 151–163.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Raghavarao, D. and J.B. Wiley (1986). Testing competing effects among soft drink brands. In Statistical Design. Theory and Practice, Proceedings of Conference in Honor of Walter T. Federer (Editors: C. E. McCulloch, S. J. Schwager, G. Casella, and S. R. Searle). Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Searle, S. R. (1979). On inverting circulant matrices. Linear Alg. Applic. 25, 77–89.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, L. L., W. T. Federer, and D. Raghavarao (1975). A comparison of three techniques for eliciting truthful answers to sensitive questions. Proceedings, American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section, pp. 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran (1980). Statistical Methods, 7th edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(1999). Intercrop Mixtures When Individual Crop Responses Are Not Available. In: Statistical Design and Analysis for Intercropping Experiments. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22647-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22647-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98533-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22647-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics