Validation of the Laboratory Information System

  • Daniel F. Cowan
  • R. Zane Gray
  • Beverly C. Campbell
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


The use of computer systems and computerized devices in the laboratory is becoming nearly universal, and increasingly processes once performed by people are being transferred to machines, the inner workings of which may be only dimly understood. The task of the people managing the work of the laboratory is to comprehend the processes by which the computerized laboratory information system (LIS) in use, usually acquired as a package from a vendor, may be shown to be doing the job it is expected to do. The functions of the system must be validated. Useful discussions of regulation1 and inspection and accreditation2 of laboratory information systems are available. However, despite its importance there is remarkably little published outside the blood bank literature about the validation of laboratory information systems that is accessible to general users of the systems, that is, addresses specifically laboratory issues in terms and concepts familiar to the laboratorian. Our intention here is to discuss LIS validation as it applies in the laboratory in general, to define the issues related to validation, and to suggest an approach to dealing with them.


Blood Bank Laboratory Information System Disaster Plan User Validation Test Script 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brannigan VM. Regulation of clinical laboratory information systems after the 1990 amendments to the Food and Drug Act. Clin Lab Man Rev 1992; 6:49–57Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aller RD. The laboratory information system as a medical device: inspection and accreditation issues. Clin Lab Man Rev 1992; 6:58–64Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brindza LJ. FDA regulation of computerized cytology devices. Anal Quant Cytol Histol l991; 13:3–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cowan DF. Implementing a regulation-compliant quality improvement program on a commercial information system. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1992; 14:407–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winsten DI. Taking the risk our of laboratory information systems. Clin Lab Man Rev 1992; 6:39–48Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cowan DF. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology: An information system approach. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114:129–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. International Organization for Standardization. 1, Rue de Varembé casse postale 56 CH-1211, Geneva 20, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNair, D. Group Vice President, Regulatory and Government Affairs, Cemer Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri. Personal communication, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Draft Guideline for the Vahdation of Blood Establishment Computer Systems. (Docket No. 93N-0394) October, 1993. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research, Rockville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guideline for Quality Assurance in Blood Establishments. (Docket No. 91N-0450) July 1995. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research, Rockville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guideline on General Principles of Process Validation. May 1987. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drugs and Biologies and Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MarylandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel F. Cowan
  • R. Zane Gray
  • Beverly C. Campbell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations