Advertisement

Brace Treatment

  • H. Jurgen Eichhorn
  • Daniel Pflaster
Chapter

Abstract

Knee braces play a significant role in the treatment of the multiple ligament injured knee. Used in conjunction with both operative or nonoperative treatment programs, a variety of knee braces exist to allow healing of the soft tissue structures in a protected environment. In its 1984 Knee Braces Seminar Report, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classified knee braces into three groups:

Prophylactic knee braces, designed to prevent or reduce the severity of knee injuries

Rehabilitative knee braces, designed to allow protected motion of injured knees or knees that have been treated operatively

Functional knee braces, designed to provide stability for the unstable knee

The AAOS position statement on knee braces, published on their Web site (http://www.AAOSo.org) states:

AAOS believes that rehabilitative knee braces and functional knee braces can be effective in many treatment programs, and that this efficacy has been demonstrated by long-term scientifically conducted studies.

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft Tissue Structure Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Knee Brace Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosenberg TD. Microperforation for chronic ACL/MCL laxity: results in a rabbit animal model and human experience. Paper presented at: meeting of the ACL Study Group; July 14–17, 2002; Millennium Hotel; Anchorage, AK.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS, Russe K, Eichhorn HJ. Fixed posterior sub-luxation in posterior cruciate ligament deficient knees: diagnosis and treatment of a new clinical sign. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (1): 32–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beynnon BD, Fleming BC. Anterior cruciate ligament strain in-vivo: a review of previous work. J Biomech 1998; 31 (6): 519–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallace MP, Howell SM, Hull ML. In vivo tensile behavior of a four-bundle hamstring graft as a replacement for the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 1997; 15 (4): 539–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Markoff KL, Burchfield DM, Shapiro MM, Cha CW, Finerman GAM, Slauterbeck JL. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 1728–1734.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wojtys EM, Kothari SU, Huston LJ. Anterior cruciate ligament functional brace use in sports. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (4): 539–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleming BC, Renstrom PA, Beynnon BD, Engstrom B, Peura G. The influence of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate ligament strain biomechanics in weightbearing and nonweightbearing knees. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (6): 815–824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD, Harwood FL, Akeson WH. The phenomena of “ligamentization”: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res 1986; 4 (2): 162–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Jurgen Eichhorn
  • Daniel Pflaster

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations