Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 285 Accesses

Abstract

There is nothing like a fledgling science to set our moral teeth on edge. From organ transplantation to assisted reproduction, and from genetic engineering to stem cell therapy, the strivings of scientists and clinicians always seem to be at least a step ahead of ethical analyses. This should occasion no despair but, rather, a sense of excitement and opportunity. The emergence and evolution of a new technology gives us a chance to test old tools and, as necessary, to invent new ones in order to get better moral leverage on the problems at hand. Such tools will inform our decisions, guide our actions, and prepare us for future challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. National Research Council. For the record: protecting electronic health information. Washington,DC: National Academy Press. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller RA, Schaffner KF, Meisel A. Ethical and legal issues related to the use of computer programs in clinical medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102:529–536.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman KW (ed). Ethics, computing, and medicine: informatics and the transformation of health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Ethical issues and patient rights: across the continuum of care. Oakbrook Terrace,IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kluge EHW. Fostering a security culture: a model code of ethics for health information professionals. Int J Med Inf. 1998;49:105–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coughlin S, Soskolne C, Goodman K. Case studies in public health ethics. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pence GE. Classic cases in medical ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Veatch RM, Flack HE. Case studies in allied health ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Allaërt FA, Dusserre L. Télémédecine et responsabilité médicale. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol. 1995;43:200–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barhyte DY. Ethical issues in automating nursing personnel data. Comput Nurs. 1987;5;171–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brody BA. The ethics of using ICU scoring systems in individual patient management. Probl Crit Care. 1989;3:662–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby KM. Ethics of computer assisted psychotherapy. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1986;19:286–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen JS, Kelley MA. Error and bias in using predictive scoring systems. Crit Care Clin. 1994;10:53–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies BL. A discussion of safety issues for medical robots. In: Taylor RH, Lavallee S, Burdea GC, Mosges R, eds. Computer-integrated surgery: technology and clinical applications. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press; 1996:287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Dombal FT. Ethical considerations concerning computers in medicine in the 1980s. J Med Ethics. 1987;3:179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning DE, Lin HS, eds. Rights and responsibilities of participants in networked communities. Washington,D.C.: National Academy Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doroszewski J. Ethical and methodological aspects of medical computer data bases and knowledge bases. Theor Med. 1988;9:117–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford BD. Ethical and professional issues in computer assisted therapy. Comput Hum Behav. 1993;9:387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamerman GE. FDA regulation of biomedical software. In: Frisse ME, ed. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual symposium on computer applications in medical care. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992:745–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman KW. Monitoring ethics. Physicians Comput. 1993;10:10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, KW. Critical care computing: outcomes, confidentiality and appropriate use. Crit Care Clin. 1996;12:109–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman KW. Ethical and legal issues in use of decision support systems. In: E. Berner, ed. Decision support systems. New York: Springer Verlag, 1998: 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman KW. Health informatics and the hospital ethics committee. MD Comput. 1999;16:17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K, Miller R. Ethics and health informatics: users, standards and outcomes. In EH Shortliffe, LE Perreault, G Wiederhold, LM Fagan, eds. Medical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001:257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler DA, Pape SM, Sundwall DN. The federal regulation of medical devices. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:357–366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge EH. Advanced patient records: some ethical and legal considerations touching medical information space. Methods Inform Med. 1993;32:95–103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RA. Why the standard view is standard: people, not machines, understand patients’ problems. J Med Philos. 1990;15:581–591.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moor J. Are there decisions computers should never make? Nat Syst. 1979; 1:217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AJ. Internet pharmacies: regulation of a growing industry. J Law Med Ethics. 2000;28:98–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolery LK. Professional standards and ethical dilemmas in nursing information systems. J Nurs Admin. 1990;20:50–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2002). Introduction: Case Studies in Ethics and Health Informatics. In: Anderson, J.G., Goodman, K.W. (eds) Ethics and Information Technology: A Case-Based Approach to a Health Care System in Transition. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22488-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22488-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95308-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22488-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics