Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Stochastic Modeling and Optimization pp 279–309Cite as

Markowitz’s World in Continuous Time, and Beyond

  • Chapter

Abstract

Mean—variance portfolio selection is concerned with the allocation of wealth among a basket of securities so as to achieve a prescribed trade-off between the return of the investment and the associated risk. The model was first proposed and solved in the single-period setting by Harry Markowitz in his Novel-Prize winning work [38] (see also [39]). The most important contribution of Markowitz’s work is the introduction of quantitative and scientific approaches to risk analysis or risk management. This work has become the foundation of modern finance and has had tremendous impact on its further development. For example, in Markowitz’s world (i.e., the world where all the investors believes in the mean—variance theory), one of the important consequences of Markowitz’s results is the so-called mutual fund theorem, which asserts that two mutual funds (which are two efficient portfolios) can be established so that all investors will be indifferent in making portfolios from among the original set of assets or from these two funds. Moreover, if a risk-free asset (such as a back account) is available, then investors need only to make use of one specific risky fund — called the tangent fund — and the risk-free asset. Assuming that portfolios are not constrained, a logical consequence of this single-period mutual fund theorem is that the market portfolio turns out to be the tangent fund, which therefore must be efficient. This, in turn, leads to the elegant capital asset pricing model (CAPM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barone-Adesi, G. and Whaley, R., Efficient analytic approximation of American option values, J. Finance, 42 (1987), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bielecki, T.R., Pliska, S. and Zhou, X.Y., Mean—Variance portfolio selection with bankruptcy prohibition. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buffington, J. and Elliott, R., American options with regime switching. Working paper, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C., The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S., LI, X. and Zhou, X.Y., Stochastic linear quadratic regulators with indefinite control weight costs, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 36 (1998), 1685–1702.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S. and Yong, J., Stochastic linear quadratic optimal control problems, Appl. Math. Optim. 43 (2001), 21–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, S. and Zhou, X.Y., Stochastic linear quadratic regulators with indefinite control weight costs. II, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 39 (2000), 1065–1081.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chid, C.H. and Zhou, X.Y., Mean—variance market portfolio, its inefficiency, and CAPM in continuous time. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cvitanic, J. and Karatzas, I., Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization, Ann. Appl. Probab., 2, 767–818.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, J. and Huang, C.F., Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process, J. Econ. Theory, 49 (1989), 33–83.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Masi, G.B., Kabanov, Y.M. and Runggaldier, W.J., Mean variance hedging of options on stocks with Markov volatility, Theory Prob. Appl., 39 (1994), 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duffie, D. and Richardson, H., Mean-variance hedging in continuous time, Ann. Appl. Prob., 14 (1991), 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dumas, B. and Luciano, E., An exact solution to a dynamic portfolio choice problem under transactions costs, J. Finance, 46 (1991), 577–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El Karoui N. Peng, S. and Quenez, M.C., Backward stochastic differential equations in finance, Math. Finance, 7 (1997), 1–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott, E.J. and Kopp, P.E., Mathematics of Financial Markets, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Francis, J.C., Investments: Analysis and Management, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gourerioux, C., Laurent, J.P. and Pham, H., Mean variance hedging and numeraire, Math. Finance, 8 (1998), 179–200.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Grauer, R.R., A comparison of growth optimal and mean-variance investment policies, J. Financial Quant. Anal., 16 (1981), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grauer, R.R. and Hakansson, N.H., On the use of mean-variance and quadratic approximations in implementing dynamic investment strategies: A comparison of the returns and investment policies, Manag. Sci., 39 (1993), 856–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grossman, S.J. and Zhou, Z., Equilibrium analysis of portfolio insurance, J. of Finance, 51 (1996), 1379–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo, X., Insider Information and Stock Fluctuations, PhD Thesis, Rutgers University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hakansson, N.H., Capital growth and the mean-variance approach to portfolio selection, J. Financial Quant. Anal., 6 (1971), 517–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harrison, M. and Kreps, D., Martingale and multiperiod securities markets, J. Econ. Theory, 20 (1979), 382–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrison, M. and Pliska, S., Martingale and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading, Stoch. Proc. Appl., 11 (1981), 215–260.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Karatzas, I. and Kou, S.G., Hedging American contingent claims with constrained portfolios, Finance and Stoch., 2 (1998), 215–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Karatzas, I., Lehoczky, J.P. and Shreve, S.E., Optimal portfolio and consumption decisions for a small investor on a finite horizon, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 25 (1987), 1157–1186.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Karatzas, I. and Shreve, S.E., Methods of Mathematical Finance, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kohlmann, M. and Zhou, X.Y., Relationship between backward stochastic differential equations and stochastic controls: A linear-quadratic approach, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 38 (2000), 1392–1407.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurent, J.P. and Pham, H., Dynamic programming and mean variance hedging, Finance Stoch., 3 (1999), 83–110.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, D. and Ng, W.L., Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: Multi-period mean-variance formulation, Math. Finance, 10 (2000), 387–406.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, X. and Zhou, X.Y., Continuous-time Markowitz’s model in an incomplete market. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, X., Zhou, X.Y. and LiM, A.E.B., Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 40 (2001), 1540–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lim, A.E.B. and Zhou, X.Y., Optimal stochastic LQR control with integral quadratic constraints and indefinite control weights, IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., 44 (1999), 1359–1369.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim, A.E.B. and Zhou, X.Y., Mean-variance portfolio selection with random parameters in a complete market, Math. Oper. Res., 27 (2002), 101–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Lintner, J., The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolios and capital budgets, Rev. Econ. Stat., 47 (1965), 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luenberger, D.G., Optimization by Vector Space Methods, John Wiley, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Luenberger, D.G., Investment Science, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection, J. of Finance, 7 (1952), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Markowitz, H., Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment, John Wiley Sons, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Markowitz, H., Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets, Frank J. Fabozzi Associates, New Hope, Pennsylvania, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Merton, R.C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case, Rev. Econ. Stat., 51 (1989), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Merton, R.C., An analytic derivation of the efficient frontier, J. Financial Quant. Anal., 7 (1972), 1851–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Merton, R.C., An intertemporal capital asset pricing model, Econometrica, 41 (1973), 867–887.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Mossin, J., Equilibrium in a capital asset market, Econometrica, 34 (1966), 768–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mossin, J., Optimal multi-period portfolio policies, J. of Business, 41 (1968), 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Perold, A.F., Large-scale portfolio optimization, Manag. Sci., 30 (1984), 1143–1160.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Pliska, S., A stochastic calculus model for continuous trading: Optimal portfolio, Math. Oper. Res., 11 (1986), 371–382.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Samuelson, P.A., Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming, Rev. Econ. Stat., 51 (1969), 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sekine, J., Mean-variance hedging in continuous-time with stochastic interest rate, Stoch. Stoch. Rep., 67 (1999), 1–16.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Sharpe, W.F., Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, J. of Finance 19 (1964), 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shirakawa, H., Optimal consumption and portfolio selection with incomplete markets and upper and lower bound constraints, Math. Finance, 4 (1994), 1–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Tobin, J., Liquidity preference as behavior toward risk, Rev. Econ. Studies, 26 (1958), 65–86.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu, G.L. and Shreve, S.E., A duality method for optimal consumption and investment under short-selling prohibition: I. general market coefficients, Ann. Appl. Prob., 2 (1992), 87–112.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu, G.L. and Shreve, S.E., A duality method for optimal consumption and investment under short-selling prohibition: II. Constant market coefficients, Ann. Appl. Prob., 2 (1992), 314–328.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Yao, D.D., Zhang, Q. and Zhou, X.Y., Option pricing with Markov-modulated volatility. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yao, D.D., Zhang, S. and Zhou, X.Y., Stochastic LQ control via semidefinite programming, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 40 (2001), 801–823.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yao, D.D., Zhang, S. and Zhou, X.Y., Tracking a stock index with a few stocks. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yong, J. and Zhou, X.Y., Stochastic Controls: Hamiltonian Systems and HJB Equations, Springer, New York, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhao, Y.G. and Ziemba, W.T., Mean-variance versus expected utility in dynamic investment analysis. Working paper, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou, X.Y. and Li, D., Continuous time mean-variance portfolio selection: A stochastic LQ framework, Appl. Math. Optim., 42 (2000), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou, X.Y. and Yin, G., Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with regime switching: A Continuous-time model. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhou, X.Y., Yong, J. and Li, X., Stochastic verification theorems within the framework of viscosity solutions, SIAM J. Contr. Optim., 35 (1997), 243–253.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Xun Yu Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhou, X.Y. (2003). Markowitz’s World in Continuous Time, and Beyond. In: Stochastic Modeling and Optimization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21757-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21757-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3065-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21757-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation