Advertisement

Arthroscopic Knot Tying in Shoulder Repair Surgery

  • Scott P. Fischer

Abstract

Recent reports have demonstrated that arthroscopic repairs of Bankart lesions can have success rates equivalent to open repairs for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder.1,2 Similarly, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques have resulted in high degrees of patient satisfaction and clinical success.3,4 Increasing interest in these and other shoulder repair techniques has led to an emphasis on the importance of adequate arthroscopic knot-tying technique. This chapter presents the basic information and skills necessary to tie arthroscopic knots in a simple, reliable, and reproducible manner.

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Repair Repair Site Monofilament Suture Soft Tissue Tension Suture Loop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bacilla P, Field LD, Savoie FH. Arthroscopic Bankart repair in a high demand population. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 51–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 677–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM, Pearce CE. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique—margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 905–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gartsman GM, Khan M, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80 (6): 832–840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman DT II, Ziegler DW, Yung SW. Optimizing arthroscopic knots using braided or monofilament suture. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 57–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman FT II, Yung SW, France MP, Sidles JA. Optimizing arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 1995; 11: 199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan KC, Burkhart SS, Thiagarajan MB, Goh JCH. Optimization of stacked half-hitch knots for arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 752–759.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

  1. Burkhart SS, Fischer SP, Nottage WM, Esch JC, Barber FA, Doctor D, Ferrier J. Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: a mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 704–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burkhart SS, Diaz-Pagan JL, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA. Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and cornparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 720–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonick M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou KA. Loop security as a determinant of tissue fixation security. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 773–776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonick M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou KA. Knot security in simple sliding knots and its relationship to rotator cuff repair: how secure must the knot be? Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 202–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan KC, Burkhart SS. How to switch posts without rethreading when tying half-hitches. Arthroscopy 1999; 15: 444–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunderson PE. The half-hitch knot: a rational alternative to the square knot. Am J Surg 1987;154:538–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim SH, Ha KI. The SMC knot—a new slip knot with locking mechanism. Arthroscopy 2000; 16:563–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim SH, Kim JS. Significance of the internal locking mechanism for loop security enhancement in the arthroscopic knot. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 850–855.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shimi SM, Lirici M, Vander Velpen G, Cuschieri A. Comparative study of the holding strength of slipknots using absorbable and nonabsorbable ligature materials. Surg Endosc 1994, 8: 1285–1291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trimbos JB. Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 274–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Trimbos JB, Van Rijssel EJC, Klopper PJ. Performance of sliding knots in monofilament suture material. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 425–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Trimbos JB, Booster M, Peters AAW. Mechanical knot performance of a new generation polydioxanone suture (PDS-2). Acta Obstet. Gynecol Scand. 1991; 70: 157–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott P. Fischer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations