Skip to main content

Optimal Control

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering ((BIOMEDICAL))

Abstract

To find out whether E. coli really knows what it is doing, Ed Purcell and I thought hard about the theory of chemoreception—I was the straight man—and concluded that its cells can sense temporal gradients about as well as any other device of similar size could possibly do (Berg and Purcell, 1977). And then my students and I looked more closely at how changes in tumble probability actually depend on the concentrations of attractants or repellents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berg, H. C., and D. A. Brown. 1972. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239:500–504.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, H. C., and E. M. Purcell. 1977. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. J. 20:193–219.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. M., J. E. Segall, and H. C. Berg. 1982. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 31:215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. M., J. E. Segall, and H. C. Berg. 1983. Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Bacteriol. 154:312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasuja, R., Y. Lin, D. R. Trentham, and S. Khan. 1999. Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11346–11351.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer, M., S. Block, H. C. Berg, and E. Purcell. 1990. Strategies for chemotaxis. Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol. 46:15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, J. E., S. M. Block, and H. C. Berg. 1986. Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8987–8991.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, J. E., A. Ishihara, and H. C. Berg. 1985. Chemotactic signaling in filamentous cells of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 161:51–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2004). Optimal Control. In: Berg, H.C. (eds) E. coli in Motion. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21638-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21638-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-00888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21638-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics