Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual Attention: The Active Vision Perspective

  • Chapter
Vision and Attention

Abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between covert visual attention and overt movements of the eyes. One of the most frequently emphasised facts concerning visual attention is the ability to attend covertly to a location in the visual field without directing the eyes to that location. Based on this, the “mental spotlight” metaphor has been widely prevalent and has given rise to much experimental work. An important, but rather neglected, question concerns what role such a mental-spotlight process might play in vision. The compelling nature of the spotlight metaphor seems likely to arise because of its similarity with overt movements of the eyes. This leads to the suggestion that covert attention is involved in some form of mental scanning. We will argue that this account is not satisfactory. An alternative account, termed active vision, develops from the fact that overt eye scanning occurs several times each second in many tasks. Analysis of information intake during text reading, scene perception and visual search suggests that no additional covert scanning occurs in these cases. Evidence however suggests that attentional processes may operate to assist in pre-processing information in the visual periphery at the location to which the eyes are about to be directed. Covert attention to peripheral locations thus acts to supplement, not substitute for, actual movements of the eyes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aloimonos, J., Bandopadhay, A. and Weiss, I. (1988). Active vision. Int. J. Comp. Vis., 1: 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anstis, S. M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vis. Res., 14: 589–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballard, D. H. (1991). Animate vision. Artif. Intel., 48: 57–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, R. K. and Rao, R. R N. (1998). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behay. Brain Sci. 20: 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binello, A., Mannan, S. and Ruddock, K. H. (1995). The characteristics of eye movements made during visual search with multi-element stimuli.Spatial Vis., 9: 343–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchard, H. E., McConkie, G. W., Zola, D. and Wolverton, G. S. (1984). Time course of visual information utilization during fixations in reading. J. Exp. Psych. Human Percept. Pet f., 10: 75–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cave, K. R. and Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: beyond the spotlight model. Psychonomic Bull. and Rev., 6: 204–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Churchland, R S., Ramachandran, V. S. and Sejnowski, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In C. Koch and J. L. Davis (Eds.) Large Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, pp. 23–60, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deubel, H. and Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vis. Res., 36: 1827–1837.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan, J., Ward, R. and Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attention dwell time in human vision, Nature, 369: 313–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychol. Sci., 9: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Egeth, H. E. and Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu. Rev. Psych., 48: 269–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection in visual search. Vis. Res., 37: 617631.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Findlay, J. M., Gilchrist, I. D. and Brown, V. (1998). Saccades in search: the role of trans-saccadic memory. Invest. Ophth. and Vis. Sci., 39: S165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Findlay, J. M. and Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccadic eye movement generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behay. and Brain Sci., 22: 661–674.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilchrist, I. D., Brown, V., Findlay, J. M. and Clarke, M. P. (1998). Using the eye movement system to control the head. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 265: 1831–1836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gough, R. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingley (Eds.) Language by Ear and by Eye. The Relationship Between Speech and Reading. pp. 335–358, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. John M. Findlay and Iain D. Gilchrist

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.) Perception. Volume 5 of the Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. J. Exp. Psych.: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16: 417–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: fixational measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian J. Exp. Psych.–Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 47: 201–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: an overview. In G Underwood (Ed.) Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception. pp. 269–293, Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Ann. Rev. Psych.50:243–271.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A. and Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Percept. and Psychophys.45:196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman, J. E. and Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept. and Psychophys., 57: 787–795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Inhoff, A. W. and Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effect of word frequency. Percept. and Psychophys., 40: 431–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: evidence for a processing trade-off. In G. Underwood (Ed.) Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception. pp. 149–179. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kennison, S. M. and Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. J. Exp. Psych.: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21: 68–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kingstone, A. and Klein, R. M. (1993). Visual offset facilitates saccade latency: does pre-disengagement of attention mediate this gap effect?.J. Exp. Psych Human Percept. and Pelf.19:251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B. and Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vis. Res., 35: 1897–1916.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Land, M. F. (1995). The functions of eye movements in animals remote from man. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker and R. W. Kentridge (Eds.) Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms Processes and Applications. pp. 63–76. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Land, M. F., Mennie, N. and Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of everyday living. Percept., 28: 13111328.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liversedge, S. P. and Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognitive science. Trends in Cog. Sci., 4: 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Loftus, G. R. and Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. J. Exp. Psych., Human Percept. and Perf, 4: 565–572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McClelland, J. L. and Mozer, M. C. (1986). Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: familiarity and similarity effects. J. Exp. Psych., Human Percept. and Perf., 12: 18–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McConkie, G. W. and Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percept. and Psychophys., 17: 578–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McPeek, R. M., Keller, E. L. and Nakayama, K. (1999). Concurrent processing of saccades. Behay. and Brain Sci., 22: 691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mari, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. J. Exp. Psych., Human Percept. and Perf, 5: 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Motter, B. C. and Belky, E. J. (1998a). The zone of focal attention during active visual search. Vis. Res., 38: 1007–1022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Motter, B. C. and Belky, E. J. (1998b). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vis. Res., 38: 1805–1818.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Müller, H. J. and Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J. Exp. Psych., Human Percept. and Perf., 15: 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakayama, K. (1992). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed) Vision: Coding and Efficiency,Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nakayama, K. and Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vis. Res., 29: 1631–1647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nelson, W. W., and Loftus, G. R. (1980). The functional visual field during picture viewing. J Exp. Psych., Hum. Learn. Mem., 6: 391–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. O’ Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the `real’ mysteries of visual perception: the world as outside memory. Can. J. Psych., 46: 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pashler, H. (1987). Detecting conjunction of color and form: re-assessing the serial search hypothesis. Percept. and Psychophys., 41: 191–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pashler, H. (Ed.) (1998) Attention. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K. and Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across saccadic eye movements. J. Exp. Psych., Gen., 113: 426–442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psych., 32: 3–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J. and Ogden, M. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick and I. J. Saltzman (Eds), Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. pp. 137–157. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J. and Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal lobe injury on covert orienting of visual attention. J. Neurosci., 4: 1863–1874.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rayner, K. (1984). Visual search in reading, picture perception and visual search. A tutorial review. In H. Bouma and D. Bouwhuis (Eds.) Attention and Performance X. pp. 67–96. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing. 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull., 124: 372–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. F. and Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychol. Rev., 105: 125–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rensink, R., O’Regan, J. K. and Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci., 8: 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vis. Res.,in press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., DaScola, I. and Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25: 31–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L. and Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltâ and M. Moscovitch (Eds.) Attention and Performance XV. pp 231–265. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rovamo, J., Virsu, V. and Näsänen, R. (1978). Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature, 271: 54–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Saarinen, J. and Julesz, B. (1991). The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 88: 1812–1814.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Saida, S. and Ikeda, M. (1979). Useful visual field size for pattern perception. Percept. and Psychophys., 25: 119–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Schall, J. D. (1995). Neural basis of saccade target selection. Rev. Neurosci., 6: 63–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Schall, J. D. and Hanes, D. P. (1998). Neural mechanisms of selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Neural Networks, 11:1241–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schall, J. D. and Thompson, K. G. (1999) Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 22: 241–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Shiori, S. and Ikeda, M. (1989). Useful resolution for picture perception as a function of eccentricity. Percept., 18: 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M. and d’Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing. Q. J. Exp. Psych., 52A: 1021–1046.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M. and Hockey, G. R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Q. J. Exp. Psych., 38A: 475–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Slowiaczek, M. L. and Rayner, K. (1987). Sequential masking during eye fixations in reading. Bul. Psychonom. Soc., 25: 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sperling, G. S. and Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psych. Rev., 102: 503–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Styles, E. (1997). The psychology of attention. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S. and Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go. Psychol. Sci., 9: 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cog. Psych., 12: 97–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Treisman, A. and Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. J. Exp. Psych., Human Percept. and Perf, 16: 459–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Van Diepen, P. M. J., Wampers, M. and d’ Ydewalle, G. (1998). Functional division of the visual field: moving masks and moving windows. In G. Underwood (Ed.) Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception. Chapter 15, pp. 337355. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wertheim, T. (1894). Über die indirekte Sehschärfe. Z. Psych. 01 Phys. Sinnesorgans, 7: 121–187.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wright, R. D. (Ed) (1998). Visual Attention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Yeshurun, Y. and Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 395: 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zelinsky, G. J. and Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. J. Exp. Psych. Human Percept. and Perf, 23: 244–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John M. Findlay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iain D. Gilchrist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, York University, 4700 Keele Street, M3J 1P3, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Michael Jenkin

  2. Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, M3J 1P3, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Laurence Harris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Findlay, J.M., Gilchrist, I.D. (2001). Visual Attention: The Active Vision Perspective. In: Jenkin, M., Harris, L. (eds) Vision and Attention. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21591-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21591-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9520-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21591-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation