Skip to main content

Vision and Attention

  • Chapter
Vision and Attention

Abstract

The term “visual attention” embraces many aspects of vision. It refers to processes that find, pull out and may possibly even help to define, features in the visual environment. All these processes take the form of interactions between the observer and the environment: attention is drawn by some aspects of the visual scene but the observer is critical in defining which aspects are selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aloimonos, J., Weiss, I. and Bandopadhyay, A. (1988). Active vision. Int. J. Comp. Vis., 1: 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgaiyan, R. D. and Posner, M. I. (1998). Mapping cingulate cortex in response to selection and monitoring. Neuroimage, 7: 255–260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H. B. (1972). Single units and perception: a neuone doctrine for percep-tion. Perception, 1:371–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C. and Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Vis. Res., 40: 1203–1216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinik, M. M., Noll, D. and Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection and online monitoring of performance. Science, 280: 747–749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, C. L. and Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and Attention in Parietal Cortex. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 22: 319–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, R. and Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 18: 193–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J. S. and Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform., 15: 448456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 113: 501–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egeth, H. E. and Dagenbach, D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 123: 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egly, R., Driver, J. and Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 123: 161–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W. and Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Percept. Psychophys., 12: 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W. and Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Percept. Psychophys., 14: 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W. and St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attraction: a zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys., 40: 225240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., Friston, K., Liddle, P. F. and Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in maw A study with PET. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 244: 241–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. R. and Jenkin, M. (1998). Vision and action. In L. R. Harris and M. Jenkin (Eds), Vision and Action, (pp. 1–12 ). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillstrom, A. P. and Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Percept. Psychophys., 55: 399–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J. and Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Percept. Psychophys., 43: 346–354.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapralos, B., Jenkin, M., Milios, E. and Tsotsos, J. (2000). Eyes ‘N Ears: A System for Attentive Teleconferencing. Proc. 139th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. and Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, P. A. (1991). Orienting without awareness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Pelf, 23: 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. M., Yantis, S. and Vaughn, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: evidence from perceptual completion. Psychol. Sci., 9: 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1959). Attention in a dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Q. J. Exp. Psych., 11:56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motter, B. C. (1998). Neurophysiology of visual attention. In R. Parasuraman (Eds), The Attentive Brain. (pp. 51–70 ). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Potter, D. D., Smith, P. A. J., Milner, A. D., Head, A. S., Jeeves, M. A. and Mistlin, A. J. (1985). Visual Cells in the Temporal Cortex Sensitive to Face View and Gaze Direction. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 223: 293–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 32: 3–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J. and Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial locations. In H. L. Pick and B. J. Saltzman (Eds), Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. (pp. 137–158 ). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. and Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 13: 25–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D. M. (2000). Human Perception of Objects. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R., and Bialek, W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theewes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task-dependent: evidence from selective search. Acta. Psychol., 74: 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1960). Contextual cues in dichotic listening. Q. J. Exp. Psych., 12: 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 353: 1295–1306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M. and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cog. Psychol., 12: 97–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsal, Y. (1983). Movement of attention across the visual field. J. Exp. Psychol., 9: 523–530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. A., Kramer, A. F. and Miller, G. A. (1997). Selective processing of superimposed objects: An electrophysiological analysis of object-based attentional selection. Biol. Psychol., 45: 159–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz, R. H. and Mohler, C. W. (1976a). Organization of monkey superior colliculus: enhanced visual response of superficial layer cells. J. Neurophysiol., 39: 745–765.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. (1998). Objects, attention and perceptual experience. In R. Wright (Ed), Visual Attention. (pp. 187–214 ). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. and Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform., 20: 95–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform., 10: 60 1621

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye Movements and Vision. New York, USA: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S. M. (1978). Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature, 274: 423–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, L.R., Jenkin, M. (2001). Vision and Attention. In: Jenkin, M., Harris, L. (eds) Vision and Attention. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21591-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21591-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9520-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21591-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics