Skip to main content

Arthroscopic Management of Shoulder Instability: Bio-Anchor (Linvatec)

  • Chapter
Advanced Arthroscopy

Abstract

The early development of suture anchors focused on suture fixation to bone. As the initial anchor designs were replaced by ones with greater load to failure strength, ease of insertion, and the ability to accommodate multiple sutures, screw type anchors and other nonscrew anchor designs appeared.1–5 Concerns about the possible challenges posed by the metallic devices6 include infection7 and impaired imaging studies.8 The most recent innovations address the issue of potential revision surgery. How does the surgeon revise a shoulder with previously placed suture anchors? Placing additional anchors in a shoulder can be technically challenging and may compromise the clinical results if infection or cold intolerance develop. One way is to remove the previous anchor either by unscrewing a screw type anchor or by drilling out a nonmetal anchor. Another approach to the problem is provided by biodegradable anchors. An anchor that provides good initial load to failure strength, but which degrades over time, has advantages analogous to the biodegradable sutures commonly used today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wolf EM, Wilk RM, Richmond JC. Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors. Oper Tech Orthop 1991; 1: 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hecker AT, Shea M, Hayhurst JO, Myers ER, Meeks LW, Hayes WC. Pull-out strength of suture anchors fór rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 874–879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shea KP, O’Keefe RM Jr, Fulkerson JP. Comparison of initial pull-out strength of arthroscopic suture and staple Bankart repair techniques. Arthroscopy 1992; 8: 179–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richmond JC, Donaldson WR, Fu F, Hamer CD. Modification of the Bankart reconstruction with a suture anchor report of a new technique. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19: 343–346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter JE, Fish DN, Huston LJ, Goldstein SA. Pull-out strength of five suture anchors. Arthroscopy 1993; 9: 109–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamai K, Sawazaki Y, Hara I. Efficacy and pitfalls of the Statak soft-tissue attachment device for the Bankart repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1993; 2: 216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ticker JB, Lippe RI, Barkin DE, Carroll MP. Infected suture anchors in the shoulder. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 613–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaenslen ES, Satterlee CC, Hinson GW. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of failed repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg 1996; 78A: 1391–1396.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berg EE, Oglesby JW. Loosening of a biodegradable shoulder staple. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 76–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards DJ, Hoy G, Saies AD, Hayes MG. Adverse reactions to an absorbable shoulder fixation device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 230–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burkhart SS, Johnson TC, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA. Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: tension overload as a possible cause of failure. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 172–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Click JN. Suture anchor strength revisited. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 32–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Norlin R. Use of Mitek anchoring for Bankart repair: a comparative, randomized, prospective study with traditional bone sutures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barber FA, Herbert M, Click JN. Internal fixation strength of suture anchors—update 1997. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shall LM, Cawley PW. Soft tissue reconstruction in the shoulder comparison of suture anchors, absorbable staples, and absorbable tacks. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 715–718.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozema FR, Bos RRM, Boering G, Leenslag JW, Pennings AJ, Verweil AB. Absorbable bone-plates and screws for the fixation of malar fractures. In: de Putter C, et al, eds. Implant Materials in Biofunction, Advances in Biomaterials,vol 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1988:251255.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura T, Shimamoto T, Watanabe S, Shimizu Y, Hyon SH, Ikada Y. Ueber die anwendung von in vivo zersetzbaren polymeren in der thoraxchirurgie. Makromol Chem Macromol 1988; Symp. 19: 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chabot F, Christel P, Vert M. In vivo tests of bioresorbable bone plates in long lasting poly (L-lactic acid). UPAC Symposium, “Polymers in Medicine and Biology,” Prague, July 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barber FA, Elrod BF, McGuire DA, Paulos LE. Preliminary results of an absorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy 1995; 11: 537–548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bostman OM. Intense granulomatous inflammatory lesions associated with absorbable internal fixation devices made of polyglycolide in ankle fractures. Clin Orthop 1992; 278: 193199.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bostman OM. Current concepts review absorbable implants for the fixation of fractures. JBone Joint Surg 1991; 73A: 148–153.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bostman OM. Osteolytic changes accompanying degradation of absorbable fracture fixation implants. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73B: 679–682.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Segmuller HE, Hayes MG, Saies AD. Arthroscopic repair of glenolabral injuries with an absorbable fixation device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997; 6: 383–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barber, F.A. (2001). Arthroscopic Management of Shoulder Instability: Bio-Anchor (Linvatec). In: Chow, J.C.Y. (eds) Advanced Arthroscopy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21541-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21541-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9513-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21541-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics