Skip to main content

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: All-Inside Double-Socket Approach

  • Chapter
Advanced Arthroscopy
  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

The normal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has intraarticular attachments that sense no bone tunnels. Ideally, an ACL substitute should be positioned and fixed at these normal attachment points. Prior studies have defined the precise attachment points of the ACL, which has led to guidelines for reproducible tunnel positioning to these locations for ACL reconstruction.1–7 These studies have focused on the importance of precise anatomic tunnel positioning, but recently the position of graft fixation as it relates to resultant graft forces, graft elongation, and creep with early postoperative range of motion has become an important issue.5,6,8 Morgan et al5 have reported that fixation testing points at the anatomic attachment points of the original ACL were nearly isometric when compared to the peripheral fixation points either within or external to traditional ACL reconstruction bone tunnels. The difference between anatomic and nonanatomic fixation on the tibial side with a common anatomic femoral fixation point was 3 to 5 mm. Ishibashi et al8 have also reported that tibial fixation close to the tibial plateau resulted in the most stable reconstructed knee, with increasing instability as the level of fixation moved away from the tibial plateau. Using a common anatomic femoral fixation site, the displacement of the tibia increased and the in-situ force of the ACL graft decreased as the tibial fixation site moved further away from the tibial plateau in ACL-reconstructed knees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Morgan CD, Galinat BJ. The tibial insertion of the ACLwhere is it? Scientific Exhibit, AAOS Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson DW, Gasser SI. Tibial tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1994; 10 (2): 124–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL, Downey DJ, Matsen FA. Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 1988; 6: 593–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Howell SM, Clark JA. Tibial tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction and graft impingement. Clin Orthop 1992; 283: 187–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM. Isometry testing for ACL reconstruction revisited. Arthroscopy 1995;11(6):647659.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Connor JJ, Zavatsky AB. Anterior cruciate ligament function in the normal knee. In: Jackson DW, ed. The anterior cruciate ligament—current and future concepts. New York: Raven Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM. Definitive anatomic landmarks for tibial tunnel positioning for ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (3): 275–288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Kim HS, Fu FH, Woo SL-Y. The effect of ACL graft fixation level on knee stability. Paper presented at the AAOS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burkhart S. The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (1): 119–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fulkerson JP, Langeland R. An alternative cruciate reconstruction graft: the central quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (2): 252–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blauth W. Die zweizugelige Ersatzplastik des vorderen Kreuzbandes aus der Quadricepssehne. Unfallheilkunde 1984; 87: 45–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Staubli HU. In: Jakob R, Staubli HU, eds. The knee and the cruciate ligaments. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 447.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wexler G, Novak P, Williams J, Bach BR. Free bone block interference fixation: mechanical analysis of a new method of fixation. Paper presented at the Residents and Fellows Arthroscopy Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palmeri, M., Morgan, C.D. (2001). Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: All-Inside Double-Socket Approach. In: Chow, J.C.Y. (eds) Advanced Arthroscopy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21541-9_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21541-9_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9513-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21541-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics