This chapter is a case study of a change of “legislation,” the formal conditions under which degree programs operate at “classical” research-driven universities. Before setting up our analytic and conceptual tools a brief history of our case:
The pressure was on at the Science Faculty at the University of Copenhagen in the middle 1990s: the Faculty had trouble making economic ends meet, and had been forced into budgetary cuts that reduced the scientific staff, in some departments by a quarter; the science degree programs were experiencing a drop in recruitment numbers; a large evaluation of these programs, covering the mathematical, physical and chemical fields, and all Danish universities who produced candidates with a Master of Science degree, had revealed rather high drop out rates, in some cases more than 50% (Danmark's Evaluerings Institut, 1999). There was an impression, among politicians, perhaps even among voters in general, and certainly voiced rather forcefully by influential lobbying organizations, such as the Confederation of Danish Industries (Dansk Industri), that many educational institutions were not fulfilling their share of the responsibility for educating the Danish youth, and that these universities were too costly, as well as too far removed from modern educational demands
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bowden, J. (2003). Why Do We Need Reforms, Which, and How Do We Implement Them? In J. Carter, K. Eriksen, S. Horst & R. Troelsen (Eds.), If Reform of University Science Education is the Answer — What were the Questions? Proceedings from the Third DCN Conference, May 2003, CNDs skriftserie No. 7, Copenhagen. Retrieved May 2008. Available at: http://www.ind.ku.dk/side22515.htm
Cuban, L. (1999). How Scholars Trumped Teachers. Change Without Reform in University Curriculum, Teaching, and Research, 1890–1990. New York: Teachers College Press
Danmarks Evaluering Institut (1999). De videregående matematik-, fysik- og kemiuddannelser. Copenhagen: EVA
Gibbs, G. (2003). Incentives for Teachers — How Should We Reward Participation in Reforms? In J. Carter, K. Eriksen, S. Horst & R. Troelsen (Eds.), If Reform of University Science Education is the Answer — What Were the Questions? Proceedings from the Third DCN Conference, May 2003, CNDs skriftserie No. 7, Copenhagen. Retrieved May 2008. Available at: http://www.ind.ku.dk/side22515.htm
Monitoring Group (2005). Studiereformstatus 2005. Copenhagen: Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen. Retrieved May 2008. Available at: http://www.ind.ku.dk/side43282.htm
Science Faculty (2002). On the Competence Criteria as Framework for the Study Reform at the Science Faculty, University of Copenhagen. Internal Document in Danish. Copenhagen: Science Faculty. Retrieved May 2008. Available at: http://www.nat.ku.dk/reform/
Traub, J. (1994). City on a Hill: Testing the American Dream at City College. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Horst, S., Laursen, K.B. (2009). Reforming University Studies. In: Skovsmose, O., Valero, P., Christensen, O.R. (eds) University Science and Mathematics Education in Transition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09829-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09829-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09828-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09829-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)